NeBlask · brand

Rooster Bet Casino — brand profile

Trust Score: 25/100 · D
Complaints: 21 in NeRating

Rooster Bet Casino is an iGaming brand. NeBlask Trust Score 25/100 (grade D). 21 player complaints on record.

rooster.bet

About the brand

The site sits in the middle band of traffic rankings. The difference between the two scores is worth investigating — Trustpilot users report problems that may not appear in the AskGamblers sample.

casino

Trust Score 25 D

Regulation

0/35

Reputation

10.5/25

Infrastructure

15/15

Transparency

0/15

Scale

0/10

Regulator blocks

In block registry 4 jurisdictions

Italy · ADM rooster.bet
Norway · Lottstift rooster.bet 2 records
Switzerland · Gespa/ESBK rooster.bet with 27 Aug 2024
Poland · Ministry of Finance rooster.bet with 22 Feb 2024 3 records

Register means: the country's providers are instructed to block access to this domain. For licensed operators the international domain (.com) usually ends up there, whilst the local version (.it, .be) operates legally — cross-check with the licence block. This is not an assessment of payout honesty.

Verified 8 October 2026 by brand domains with registries 7 jurisdictions; unavailable:PL.

Mirrors and clones

8 domains by root 8

rooster1.bet rooster2.bet rooster3.bet rooster4.bet rooster5.bet rooster6.bet rooster7.bet rooster8.bet

Domains from blocking registries of various jurisdictions whose name matches the brand (exact) or shares its root (stem). Some are working operator mirrors, some are clones and phishing under another's name; the registry does not distinguish.

Popularity and Authority

CrUX Chrome UX Report · real Chrome users top‑1,000,000 dataset 2026-08

Verified 21 August 2026. CrUX and Radar return buckets (top 1,000, top 50,000…), not exact positions; Open PageRank counts links, not traffic; Wikipedia — article views by people over the last full month.

Domains

rooster1.bet 200 SSL: 81 d. 253ms

rooster2.bet 200 SSL: 70 d. 241ms

rooster3.bet 200 SSL: 80 d. 148ms

rooster4.bet 200 SSL: 70 d. 164ms

rooster5.bet 200 SSL: 70 d. 235ms

rooster6.bet 200 SSL: 44 d. 262ms

rooster7.bet 200 SSL: 50 d. 257ms

rooster8.bet 200 SSL: 70 d. 223ms

rooster.bet 200 SSL: 59 d. 174ms

Trustpilot

2.2 210 reviews

Open on Trustpilot

Trustpilot in-depth analysis

Analysed

of 184 reviews

Average rating

1.49

→ trend: 1.5 vs 1.5

Sentiment

negative

12% / 88% / 0%

Verified

Frequent topics

scam 27

bonus 19

deposit 22

withdrawal 42

odds fairness 13

account issues 27

user experience 11

customer support 29

Recent Reviews

Ville Laine FI 2 weeks ago

good casino with great customer service

Piet DE 3 weeks ago

My overall experience through several months is very good. Customer service is easy to reach, seems to be very pro customer and is therefore always very helpful. There are many benefits like free spins and cashback bonuses available through deposits but also a bunch of promos rew...

Dima LU 3 weeks ago

One of the best online Casinos, many Games every time Up to Date with the newest Games online, a very good customer service.

Responses to Negative Feedback

Responds to Negative Feedback

93.2%

41 of 44

Average time to reply

11.2 d.

last 11 Sep 2026

profile claimed by brand

Monthly Rating Trend

Sep 25Sep 26

Casino Guru

Safety Index

8 / 10

High

Operator

Novatrix S.R.L.

Founded

2023

Sister casinos

Game providers

166

Withdrawal limit

EUR 2,000 per day

Win limit

No win limit

Currencies

USD CAD EUR AUD NOK NZD ZAR

Pros

Multiple currencies in one account
Live chat support is available 24/7
Huge selection of game providers
Live dealer games are available

Cons

Not all payment methods are available for all countries

Open on Casino Guru

Complaints Casino Guru

Total complaints 51

Resolved: 13 Open: 2 Rejected: 36

Complaints on Casino Guru

Player complaints NeRating

Cases in NeRating database 21

Player complaints from independent sources: payout disputes, account blocks, bonus conflicts.

Player complaints about Rooster Bet Casino — NeRating →

AskGamblers detailed

Casino rating

8.3/10

Player rating

8.6/10

133 reviews

Founded

2023

Complaints

8 / 8

resolved, ∅ 10 days

Withdrawal speed

E-Wallets	0-24 hours
Card Payments	1-5 days
Bank Transfers	3-7 days
Weekend Cashouts	Yes
Crypto Currencies	0-24 hours
Progressive Jackpot Wins	Paid In Lump Sum

Pros

Fast withdrawals
Excellent selection of payment options
24/7 live chat

Cons

Low daily withdrawal limits

Full Profile on AskGamblers

ScamAdviser

Trust Score 1 / 100

In summary, we scanned rooster.bet for several indicators and we think the website may be a scam. Exercise extreme caution when using this website.

Positives

According to the SSL check the certificate is valid
DNSFilter considers this website safe

Negatives

Several, mainly negative reviews were found for this site

Open on ScamAdviser

Security

VirusTotal

0 malicious

0 suspicious

0 reputation

Security Headers

15 / 100

CSP HSTS X-CONTENT-TYPE REFERRER-POLICY X-FRAME-OPTIONS PERMISSIONS-POLICY

Cookies: 1 (100% secure)

PageSpeed

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

Core Web Vitals

LCP 22,144ms

CLS 2.883

Availability by country

Country	Bonus	Licence	Currency
AU	25% Up to $100	GGL, SGA, ADM	USD
BR	—	—	—
CA	25% Up to $100	ANJ, SGA	USD
DE	€ 5000 BONUS	GGL, SGA	AUD
GB	—	—	—

Rating on aggregators 5 sources

5.9 / 10 of 5 sources

AskGamblers

8.3

AskGamblers (Deep)

8.3

Trustpilot

4.4

Trustpilot (Deep)

3.0

ScamAdviser

0.1

Best: AskGamblers Worst: ScamAdviser

Affiliates in results SERP

Affiliates in results

#9 Vegasslotsonline 115 brands

#3 Casino.guru 622 brands

#2 Askgamblers 1017 brands

#1 Trustpilot 1549 brands

News background Google News

Mentions

latest: 1 month ago

Tone

positive

Sources

Licences

No licence records found in our registers yet. Check public registers: regulator map.

Withdrawal

Withdrawal times by method, payment methods and complaint statistics on payout delays are on a separate page — the passport does not have these breakdowns.

Rooster Bet Casino — payouts: timing, methods, payout complaints

Trust passport compiled from public sources: regulator registries, review platforms, NeRating complaints, brand domains and infrastructure. Methodology.