Skip to main content

Spinia — player complaint #63873, 2020-04-16: bonus terms

Spinia: a player complaint filed on 2020-04-16, about bonus terms, status — rejected. Published on CasinoReviews. One of 84 complaints filed in English about this operator. The text below is the player's own words, as published on the source site.

2020-04-16 CasinoReviews Bonus terms Rejected

Spinia - confiscated winnings

After depositing to spinia I received a bonus (April 15th 17:05:54). I went on playing for a couple of hours and got very lucky. After requesting a cashout (April 16th 8:48:23) I received the message I made a bet of greater then 50+ euro's which caused a cancellation of my cashout and a reset of my balance back to the deposit I made of 100 euro. I do not agree with this. Whilst i understand that laws should be abided and rules are in place for a reason i do consider the reason for confiscating winning are extremely harsh in this case. I must admit i didn't read the small print when accepting the bonus and wasn't aware of the rule i was breaking. So I do confess to pressing the button for a bonus buy which exceeded this 50 euro mark, but the spinia system prevented this bet from being placed. I got an error and got disconnected from the slot machine with exactly the same balance i had before the attempt. In my opinion this means the bet is void and thus not played at all. I do not believe that i "won' the exact same amount as the bet size. Had it gone through and the bet was played i wouldn't be challenging this decision because a rule was broken.   The winning i accumulated i received mainly for playing slots with a bet size of 1 euro. So taking away roughly 1200 euro's of honest winnings on bets that were not played at all is harsh in my opinion. If the bet with a size greater then 50 euro's slipped through the system and got played, regardless of the result, i would agree with the taken sanctions. But taking away this amount of money on not played bets is not something i can understand or agree with. Trying to resolve this issue via the support system spinia has in place proved to be impossible. Why block the payment half a day after the supposed illegal bet has been placed and not make clear directly after placing the bet,which has been void and not played, that playing further is futile because the amount of money in the account would be reset either way. Long story short. I didn't gain or lose anything from the supposed 50+ euro bet because the site's system did the job of preventing the bet to be played perfectly. Since it did not get played I can't understand why their confiscating should be valid. When a bet is refused it is not placed? And if it is valid why doesn't their system automatically warns / bans people? Now I managed to play myself to a nice amount of winnings just to get the door slammed in my face after requesting a cashout.

Complaint data

Case number
#63873
Filed
2020-04-16
Status
Rejected
Category
Bonus terms
Place among complaints about Spinia
35 of 84 by date, newest first
Source
CasinoReviews — original ↗
Text
468 words, as published

All 84 English-language complaints about Spinia — as a list by date; the summary, statuses and disputed sums are on the operator page.

Similar complaints about Spinia: bonus terms

Bonus terms at other operators

  • Betfred 57 complaints in English
  • Stake 53 complaints in English
  • BitStarz 47 complaints in English
  • Coral 41 complaints in English
  • N1 40 complaints in English

How the risk index is calculated and how complaints are labelled — the method behind this section.

Project sponsors

Companies that keep this analytics open
Gold sponsor

Impressions, clicks and code copies — open statistics. We keep the numbers public for the same reason NeBlask itself is public. Become a sponsor