Lucky Hunter Casino — player complaints: 6 in English
6Complaints
2▲Last 30 days · was 1
2Unresolved
2.6214564520255dLast complaint
55.6Risk index
55,354 CAD · €14,497Disputed sums
Lucky Hunter Casino: 6 complaints filed in English across 1 platform, 2 still open, disputed sums 55,354 CAD · €14,497. Most of them are about verification (33%). Risk index 55.6. Texts below are the players' own words, as published on the source site; last complaint 2026-11-05.
How many complaints are there about Lucky Hunter Casino?
The English-language record holds 6 complaints from 1 platform, 2 of them without a resolution; 3 carry no status from the platform. The latest one is dated 2026-11-05.
What do players complain about?
Mostly verification — 33% of cases, then withheld payouts (33%).
Why is this page not a translation of the Russian one?
It is a different set of complaints. Russian pages count every source we scrape; this page counts only complaints whose original text is English — 6 of them here. Nothing is machine-translated in either direction.
How is the risk index calculated?
Risk index 55.6 is the share of complaints marked unresolved among those with a known status, plus a correction for disputed sums.
The player from Austria filed a complaint against LuckyHunter and its operator, Stable Tech NV, demanding a full refund of €14,450 after declaring his gambling addiction to another casino, Hollywin, prior to making the deposits. He argued that effective player protection measures were not applied, allowing him to open a new account and incur losses despite his known gambling issues. After reviewing the evidence, we did not pursue the refund because the exclusion was only confirmed for Hollywin and was not sufficiently shown to have been applied to LuckyHunter. We also found that sister-casino self-exclusion and common ownership alone were not enough to establish responsibility for the LuckyHunter losses.The player from Austria filed a complaint against LuckyHunter and its operator, Stable Tech NV, demanding a full refund of €14,450 after declaring his gambling addiction to another casino, Hollywin, prior to making the deposits. He argued that effective player protection measures were not applied, allowing him to open a new account and incur losses despite his known gambling issues. After reviewing the evidence, we did not pursue the refund because the exclusion was only confirmed for Hollywin and was not sufficiently shown to have been applied to LuckyHunter. We also found that sister-casino self-exclusion and common ownership alone were not enough to establish responsibility for the LuckyHunter losses. Written by VeronikaComplaint Resolution Center Deputy Team Lead Submitted: 27 Oct 2026 | Closed : 04 Nov 2026Automatic translation:
The player from Ontario faces difficulties withdrawing funds due to repeated rejections of his bank statement verification, despite previously having a successful withdrawal from the same account. His bank statements cover a specific period, requiring him to send multiple files, which the casino only accepts as one file. He has encountered over a dozen rejections and has not resolved the issue despite contacting support and the VIP manager.The player from Ontario faces difficulties withdrawing funds due to repeated rejections of his bank statement verification, despite previously having a successful withdrawal from the same account. His bank statements cover a specific period, requiring him to send multiple files, which the casino only accepts as one file. He has encountered over a dozen rejections and has not resolved the issue despite contacting support and the VIP manager. Written by KarlaCasino Analyst & Complaint Specialist Submitted: 27 Oct 2026 | Resolved : 28 Oct 2026Automatic translation:
The player from Alberta has requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. Their money hasn’t been received yet.The player from Alberta has requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. Their money hasn’t been received yet. Written by JeanCasino Analyst & Complaint Specialist Submitted: 26 Sep 2026 Automatic translation:
The player from Slovenia was unable to withdraw his funds despite providing all the necessary information and documents. The casino claimed there was a modification issue, which he disputed. We asked him to forward the documents and any communication with the casino for review, but he did not respond to our follow-up messages and reminders. As a result, the complaint was closed for now because we could not continue the investigation without his cooperation.
