Gladiatorsbet Casino— player complaints: 8 in English
8Complaints
0▼Last 30 days · was 5
7Unresolved
33.520075198576dLast complaint
101.7Risk index
€3,000Disputed sum
Gladiatorsbet Casino: 8 complaints filed in English across 1 platform, 7 still open, disputed sums €3,000. Most of them are about withheld payouts (50%). Risk index 101.7. Texts below are the players' own words, as published on the source site; last complaint 2026-09-08.
What players complain about
Withheld payouts50%4
Other38%3
Account blocks13%1
Unresolved 6
Under review 1
Status unknown 1
Complaints by month
07
08
09
Questions and answers
How many complaints are there about Gladiatorsbet Casino?
The English-language record holds 8 complaints from 1 platform, 7 of them without a resolution; 1 carry no status from the platform. The latest one is dated 2026-09-08.
What do players complain about?
Mostly withheld payouts — 50% of cases, then other (38%).
Why is this page not a translation of the Russian one?
It is a different set of complaints. Russian pages count every source we scrape; this page counts only complaints whose original text is English — 8 of them here. Nothing is machine-translated in either direction.
How is the risk index calculated?
Risk index 101.7 is the share of complaints marked unresolved among those with a known status, plus a correction for disputed sums.
Complaints 8
08.09.2026Casino GuruAccount blocksUnresolved
Player seeks reimbursement for closed account.
Player seeks reimbursement for closed account. [Account] — no_react_reg_bad
08.09.2026Casino GuruWithheld payoutsUnresolved
Player’s withdrawal has been confiscated.
Player’s withdrawal has been confiscated. [Withdrawal] — no_react_reg_bad
08.09.2026Casino GuruOtherUnresolved
Player's funds have been confiscated.
Player's funds have been confiscated. [Winnings dispute] — no_react_reg_bad
08.09.2026Casino GuruOtherUnder review
Player is being denied permanent self-exclusion.
Player is being denied permanent self-exclusion. [Self-exclusion] — waiting
08.09.2026Casino GuruWithheld payoutsUnresolved
Player's withdrawal is rejected and funds are confiscated.
Player's withdrawal is rejected and funds are confiscated. [Withdrawal] — no_react_reg_bad
07.08.2026Casino GuruWithheld payoutsUnresolved
Gladiatorsbet Casino - Player's withdrawal is rejected and funds are confiscated.
The player from Finland deposited 60€ at Gladiatorsbet Casino and met the wagering requirement but had 180€ removed from her balance. After accumulating 3000€, her withdrawal of 1000€ was rejected, and an additional 2820€ was deducted, leaving her with 180€. The casino's customer service had not provided any explanation for the fund removals. We repeatedly asked the casino to clarify the confiscations and withdrawal rejections, but it did not reply or cooperate. As a result, the complaint was marked unresolved due to the casino’s lack of response.
17.07.2026Casino GuruWithheld payoutsUnresolved
Gladiatorsbet Casino - Player’s withdrawal has been confiscated.
The player from Germany complained that GladiatorsBet had refused to pay out his winnings of €150.00, while also blocking his deposit of €30.00. The casino cited violations of terms without evidence and had set a minimum withdrawal limit that made it impossible for him to access his funds. The player stated he had played with bonuses and waited for all bonuses to expire before attempting withdrawal. The complaint was marked as unresolved due to the casino's lack of response despite repeated attempts to contact them. The player was advised to escalate the matter to the Anjouan Gaming Authority for further assistance.
01.07.2026Casino GuruOther
Gladiatorsbet Casino - Player is being denied permanent self-exclusion.
The player from Spain faced issues with the casino refusing to allow him to permanently self-exclude despite his severe gambling addiction. They only provided a temporary one-month suspension, reactivating his account thereafter. We reviewed his request for permanent self-exclusion and, after the casino confirmed in writing that his account would be permanently closed, the complaint was considered resolved. The resolution was based on the casino’s formal confirmation of permanent closure, which matched his request.
