js-performance-patterns — Claude Code skill: how to install
Runtime performance patterns for JavaScript hot paths. Helps agents optimize tight loops, frequent event callbacks, and DOM operations across JS frameworks.
npx skills add PatternsDev/skills --skill js-performance-patterns -a claude-codeWhat js-performance-patterns does
The skill supplies framework-agnostic runtime optimization patterns for JavaScript and TypeScript. It targets repeated performance bottlenecks: swapping array .includes() with Set.has() for O(1) lookups, combining chained .filter().map() pipelines into one pass, and memoizing pure functions. For browser scripts, it guides agents to batch DOM reads and writes separately. This prevents layout thrashing.
Micro-optimizations do not replace algorithmic fixes. The instructions state you should eliminate quadratic complexity before tweaking hot loops. Applying these micro-patterns to cold paths is explicitly discouraged because readability matters more than nanosecond gains. The guidelines fit Node.js and client-side code whenever profiling shows a bottleneck in arrays with 1,000+ items or 60fps event handlers.
What it helps with
- replace linear array lookups with
SetandMap - eliminate layout thrashing by batching DOM reads and writes
- combine chained
.filter()and.map()calls into a single loop - memoize heavy pure function results to avoid recomputations
Example prompts for the agent
- Optimize the hot loop in
src/parser.tsusing js-performance-patterns - Check this scroll handler for layout thrashing and batch DOM reads
- Refactor the chained filter and map calls into a single pass
How to install js-performance-patterns
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add PatternsDev/skills --skill js-performance-patterns -a claude-code2Manually: put the files in place
~/.claude/skills/js-performance-patterns/SKILL.mdCopy the whole skill folder; for one project use .claude/skills/js-performance-patterns/
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add PatternsDev/skills --skill js-performance-patterns -a codex2Manually: put the files in place
.agents/skills/js-performance-patterns/SKILL.mdFor all projects use ~/.agents/skills/
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add PatternsDev/skills --skill js-performance-patterns -a cursor2Manually: put the files in place
.cursor/skills/js-performance-patterns/SKILL.mdCursor also reads .agents/skills/ and .claude/skills/
1GitHub CLI
gh skill install PatternsDev/skills js-performance-patterns2Manually: put the files in place
.github/skills/js-performance-patterns/SKILL.md1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add PatternsDev/skills --skill js-performance-patterns -a gemini-cli2Platform CLI
gemini skills install https://github.com/PatternsDev/skills --path javascript/js-performance-patternsManually: put the files in place
.devin/skills/js-performance-patterns/SKILL.mdThe legacy .windsurf/skills/ path still works
Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add PatternsDev/skills --skill js-performance-patterns -a opencodeClaude.ai
Zip the folder and upload it in Settings → Capabilities → Skills
Step by step, with commands for each platform: How to install skills in Claude Code: five ways
Questions about js-performance-patterns
How to install js-performance-patterns in Claude Code?
Run npx skills add PatternsDev/skills --skill js-performance-patterns -a claude-code. The file will be placed in ~/.claude/skills/js-performance-patterns/SKILL.md.
Where should js-performance-patterns be used?
The skill applies to JavaScript and TypeScript across Node.js and browser environments. It focuses on hot paths like datasets with 1,000+ items, animation frames, and high-frequency events like scroll or resize.
Does this skill replace algorithmic optimizations?
No. The rules explicitly instruct addressing algorithmic complexity first, such as moving from O(n²) to O(n). Micro-optimizations should only be used on measured hot paths after the algorithm is sound.
Source text
SKILL.md · MIT
---
name: js-performance-patterns
description: Provides framework-agnostic JavaScript runtime performance patterns. Use when optimizing hot paths, loops, DOM operations, caching, or data structure choices in performance-critical code.
paths:
- "**/*.js"
- "**/*.ts"
license: MIT
metadata:
author: patterns.dev
version: "1.1"
related_skills:
- "module-pattern"
- "singleton-pattern"
---
# JavaScript Performance Patterns
## Table of Contents
- [When to Use](#when-to-use)
- [Instructions](#instructions)
- [Details](#details)
- [Source](#source)
Runtime performance micro-patterns for JavaScript hot paths. These patterns matter most in tight loops, frequent callbacks (scroll, resize, animation frames), and data-heavy operations. They apply to any JavaScript environment — React, Vue, vanilla, Node.js.
## When to Use
Reference these patterns when:
- Profiling reveals a hot function or tight loop
- Processing large datasets (1,000+ items)
- Handling high-frequency events (scroll, mousemove, resize)
- Optimizing build-time or server-side scripts
- Reviewing code for performance in critical paths
## Instructions
- Apply these patterns only in **measured hot paths** — code that runs frequently or processes large datasets. Don't apply them to cold code paths where readability is more important than nanosecond gains.
## Details
### Overview
Micro-optimizations are **not** a substitute for algorithmic improvements. Address the algorithm first (O(n^2) to O(n), removing waterfalls, reducing DOM mutations). Once the algorithm is right, these patterns squeeze additional performance from hot paths.
---
### 1. Use `Set` and `Map` for Lookups
**Impact: HIGH for large collections** — O(1) vs O(n) per lookup.
Array methods like `.includes()`, `.find()`, and `.indexOf()` scan linearly. For repeated lookups against the same collection, convert to `Set` or `Map` first.
**Avoid — O(n) per check:**
```typescript
const allowedIds = ['a', 'b', 'c', /* ...hundreds more */]
function isAllowed(id: string) {
return allowedIds.includes(id) // scans entire array
}
items.filter(item => allowedIds.includes(item.id)) // O(n * m)
```
**Prefer — O(1) per check:**
```typescript
const allowedIds = new Set(['a', 'b', 'c', /* ...hundreds more */])
function isAllowed(id: string) {
return allowedIds.has(id)
}
items.filter(item => allowedIds.has(item.id)) // O(n)
```
For key-value lookups, use `Map` instead of scanning an array of objects:
```typescript
// Avoid
const users = [{ id: 1, name: 'Alice' }, { id: 2, name: 'Bob' }]
const user = users.find(u => u.id === targetId) // O(n)
// Prefer
const userMap = new Map(users.map(u => [u.id, u]))
const user = userMap.get(targetId) // O(1)
```
---
### 2. Batch DOM Reads and Writes
**Impact: HIGH** — Prevents layout thrashing.
Interleaving DOM reads (e.g., `offsetHeight`, `getBoundingClientRect`) with DOM writes (e.g., `style.height = ...`) forces the browser to recalculate layout multiple times. Batch all reads first, then all writes.
**Avoid — layout thrashing (read/write/read/write):**
```typescript
elements.forEach(el => {
const height = el.offsetHeight // read → forces layout
el.style.height = `${height * 2}px` // write
})
// Each iteration forces a layout recalculation
```
**Prefer — batched reads then writes:**
```typescript
// Read phase
const heights = elements.map(el => el.offsetHeight)
// Write phase
elements.forEach((el, i) => {
el.style.height = `${heights[i] * 2}px`
})
```
For complex cases, use `requestAnimationFrame` to defer writes to the next frame, or use a library like [fastdom](https://github.com/wilsonpage/fastdom).
**CSS class approach — single reflow:**
```typescript
// Avoid multiple style mutations
el.style.width = '100px'
el.style.height = '200px'
el.style.margin = '10px'
// Prefer — one reflow
el.classList.add('expanded')
// or
el.style.cssText = 'width:100px;height:200px;margin:10px;'
```
---
### 3. Cache Property Access in Tight Loops
**Impact: MEDIUM** — Reduces repeated property resolution.
Accessing deeply nested properties or array `.length` in every iteration adds overhead in tight loops.
**Avoid:**
```typescript
for (let i = 0; i < data.items.length; i++) {
process(data.items[i].value.nested.prop)
}
```
**Prefer:**
```typescript
const { items } = data
for (let i = 0, len = items.length; i < len; i++) {
const val = items[i].value.nested.prop
process(val)
}
```
This matters for arrays with 10,000+ items or when called at 60fps. For small arrays or infrequent calls, the readable version is fine.
---
### 4. Memoize Expensive Function Results
**Impact: MEDIUM-HIGH** — Avoids recomputing the same result.
When a pure function is called repeatedly with the same arguments, cache the result.
**Simple single-value cache:**
```typescript
function memoize<T extends (...args: any[]) => any>(fn: T): T {
let lastArgs: any[] | undefined
let lastResult: any
return ((...args: any[]) => {
if (lastArgs && args.every((arg, i) => Object.is(arg, lastArgs![i]))) {
return lastResult
}
lastArgs = args
lastResult = fn(...args)
return lastResult
}) as T
}
const expensiveCalc = memoize((data: number[]) => {
return data.reduce((sum, n) => sum + heavyTransform(n), 0)
})
```
**Multi-key cache with Map:**
```typescript
const cache = new Map<string, Result>()
function getResult(key: string): Result {
if (cache.has(key)) return cache.get(key)!
const result = computeExpensiveResult(key)
cache.set(key, result)
return result
}
```
For caches that can grow unbounded, use an LRU strategy or `WeakMap` for object keys.
---
### 5. Combine Iterations Over the Same Data
**Impact: MEDIUM** — Single pass instead of multiple.
Chaining `.filter().map().reduce()` creates intermediate arrays and iterates the data multiple times. For large arrays in hot paths, combine into a single loop.
**Avoid — 3 iterations, 2 intermediate arrays:**
```typescript
const result = users
.filter(u => u.active)
.map(u => u.name)
.reduce((acc, name) => acc + name + ', ', '')
```
**Prefer — single pass:**
```typescript
let result = ''
for (const u of users) {
if (u.active) {
result += u.name + ', '
}
}
```
For small arrays (< 100 items), the chained version is fine and more readable. Optimize only when profiling shows it matters.
---
### 6. Short-Circuit with Length Checks First
**Impact: LOW-MEDIUM** — Avoids expensive operations on empty inputs.
Before running expensive comparisons or transformations, check if the input is empty.
```typescript
function findMatchingItems(items: Item[], query: string): Item[] {
if (items.length === 0 || query.length === 0) return []
const normalized = query.toLowerCase()
return items.filter(item =>
item.name.toLowerCase().includes(normalized)
)
}
```
---
### 7. Return Early to Skip Unnecessary Work
**Impact: LOW-MEDIUM** — Reduces average-case execution.
Structure functions to exit as soon as possible for common non-matching cases.
**Avoid — always does full work:**
```typescript
function processEvent(event: AppEvent) {
let result = null
if (event.type === 'click') {
if (event.target && event.target.matches('.actionable')) {
result = handleAction(event)
}
}
return result
}
```
**Prefer — exits early:**
```typescript
function processEvent(event: AppEvent) {
if (event.type !== 'click') return null
if (!event.target?.matches('.actionable')) return null
return handleAction(event)
}
```
---
### 8. Hoist RegExp and Constant Creation Outside Loops
**Impact: LOW-MEDIUM** — Avoids repeated compilation.
Creating RegExp objects or constant values inside loops or frequently-called functions wastes CPU.
**Avoid — compiles regex 10,000 times:**
```typescript
function validate(items: string[]) {
return items.filter(item => {
const pattern = /^[a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,}$/
return pattern.test(item)
})
}
```
**Prefer — compile once:**
```typescript
const EMAIL_PATTERN = /^[a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,}$/
function validate(items: string[]) {
return items.filter(item => EMAIL_PATTERN.test(item))
}
```
---
### 9. Use `toSorted()`, `toReversed()`, `toSpliced()` for Immutability
**Impact: LOW** — Correct immutability without manual copying.
The new non-mutating array methods avoid the `[...arr].sort()` pattern and communicate intent more clearly.
**Avoid — manual copy then mutate:**
```typescript
const sorted = [...items].sort((a, b) => a.price - b.price)
const reversed = [...items].reverse()
const without = [...items]; without.splice(index, 1)
```
**Prefer — non-mutating methods:**
```typescript
const sorted = items.toSorted((a, b) => a.price - b.price)
const reversed = items.toReversed()
const without = items.toSpliced(index, 1)
```
These are available in all modern browsers and Node.js 20+.
---
### 10. Use `requestAnimationFrame` for Visual Updates
**Impact: MEDIUM** — Syncs with the browser's render cycle.
DOM updates triggered outside the rendering cycle (from timers, event handlers, etc.) can cause jank. Batch visual updates inside `requestAnimationFrame`.
**Avoid — updates outside render cycle:**
```typescript
window.addEventListener('scroll', () => {
progressBar.style.width = `${getScrollPercent()}%`
counter.textContent = `${getScrollPercent()}%`
}, { passive: true })
```
**Prefer — synced to render:**
```typescript
let ticking = false
window.addEventListener('scroll', () => {
if (!ticking) {
requestAnimationFrame(() => {
const pct = getScrollPercent()
progressBar.style.width = `${pct}%`
counter.textContent = `${pct}%`
ticking = false
})
ticking = true
}
}, { passive: true })
```
---
### 11. Use `structuredClone` for Deep Copies
**Impact: LOW** — Correct deep cloning without libraries.
`structuredClone()` handles circular references, typed arrays, Dates, RegExps, Maps, and Sets — unlike `JSON.parse(JSON.stringify())`.
```typescript
// Avoid — loses Dates, Maps, Sets, undefined values
const copy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(original))
// Prefer — handles all standard types
const copy = structuredClone(original)
```
Note: `structuredClone` cannot clone functions or DOM nodes. For those cases, implement a custom clone.
---
### 12. Prefer `Map` Over Plain Objects for Dynamic Keys
**Impact: LOW-MEDIUM** — Better performance for frequent additions/deletions.
V8 optimizes plain objects for static shapes. When keys are added and removed dynamically (caches, counters, registries), `Map` provides consistently better performance.
```typescript
// Avoid for dynamic keys
const counts: Record<string, number> = {}
items.forEach(item => {
counts[item.category] = (counts[item.category] || 0) + 1
})
// Prefer for dynamic keys
const counts = new Map<string, number>()
items.forEach(item => {
counts.set(item.category, (counts.get(item.category) ?? 0) + 1)
})
```
---
## Source
Patterns from [patterns.dev](https://www.patterns.dev/) — JavaScript performance guidance for the broader web engineering community.
© patterns.dev · MIT · PatternsDev/skills