Skip to main content

FortuneJack — player complaint #4685, 2021-10-26: bonus terms

FortuneJack: a player complaint filed on 2021-10-26, about bonus terms. Published on Trustpilot. One of 123 complaints filed in English about this operator. The text below is the player's own words, as published on the source site.

2021-10-26 Trustpilot Bonus terms

Low Return to Player, Steep Wagering Requirements, Fake Reviews

The RTP on their slots feels insanely low. Like gas station slot machine low. Yeah you could get *really* lucky, and they're good about allowing you to withdraw if you do (at least I was on my first deposit; I managed to cash out the minimum), but your odds are much better elsewhere.Avoid the bonuses unless they're not attached to a deposit. They'll play through your deposit first, leaving you to play through the wagering requirement of the bonus if you want to walk away, and since the wagering requirements are 40x you're probably not going to walk away with anything.Note: lots of fake reviews on here. I've seen several carbon copies of one another.

Complaint data

Case number
#4685
Filed
2021-10-26
Status
Status unknown
Category
Bonus terms
Place among complaints about FortuneJack
97 of 123 by date, newest first
Source
Trustpilot — original ↗
Text
115 words, as published

All 123 English-language complaints about FortuneJack — as a list by date; the summary, statuses and disputed sums are on the operator page.

Similar complaints about FortuneJack: bonus terms

Bonus terms at other operators

  • Betfred 57 complaints in English
  • Stake 53 complaints in English
  • BitStarz 47 complaints in English
  • Coral 41 complaints in English
  • N1 40 complaints in English

How the risk index is calculated and how complaints are labelled — the method behind this section.

Project sponsors

Companies that keep this analytics open
Gold sponsor

Impressions, clicks and code copies — open statistics. We keep the numbers public for the same reason NeBlask itself is public. Become a sponsor