FatBoss Casino — brand profile
- Trust Score
- 15/100 · F
FatBoss Casino is an iGaming brand. NeBlask Trust Score 15/100 (grade F).
fatboss.com
Of the 100 trust score points the brand holds 15 (grade F): regulation — 0 of 35, reputation — 0 of 25, infrastructure — 8.6 of 15, transparency — 0 of 15, scale — 6 of 10. The widest gap is in regulation: 35 points of 35 are not scored. No active licence from the registers NeBlask checks is on record for this brand.
Is FatBoss Casino blocked by regulators?
- France · ANJ fatboss1.com
- Poland · Ministry of Finance fatboss1.com
- Belgium · Gaming Commission fatboss1.com
- Switzerland · Gespa/ESBK fatboss.com
Register means: the country's providers are instructed to block access to this domain. For licensed operators the international domain (.com) usually ends up there, whilst the local version (.it, .be) operates legally — cross-check with the licence block. This is not an assessment of payout honesty.
Verified 28 October 2026 by brand domains with registries 8 jurisdictions.
Mirrors and clones
Domains from blocking registries of various jurisdictions whose name matches the brand (exact) or shares its root (stem). Some are working operator mirrors, some are clones and phishing under another's name; the registry does not distinguish.
Domains
ScamAdviser
- The average review score for this site is mediocre
- We found a valid SSL certificate
- The site has been set-up several years ago
- The identity of the owner of the website is hidden on WHOIS
- The Tranco rank (how much traffic) is rather low
- The website is in a high risk location
- The registrar of this website is popular amongst scammers
- The reviews are either very positive or negative
Does FatBoss Casino have a licence?
No licence for FatBoss Casino was found in our data. That does not mean the brand is unlicensed: our database does not cover every register or every brand. Check the register of the regulator named on the FatBoss Casino website.
Check the public registers: regulator map.
Trust passport compiled from public sources: regulator registries, review platforms, NeRating complaints, brand domains and infrastructure. Methodology.