web-design-reviewer — GitHub Copilot skill for design checks
This skill inspects a running website, spots layout, responsive, and accessibility issues, and can fix them in the source code. Use it when a UI review should lead to verified code changes.
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill web-design-reviewerWhat web-design-reviewer does
The skill navigates the site in a browser, captures screenshots, and inspects page structure. It checks overflow, overlapping elements, mobile layouts, contrast, focus states, image alt text, and visual consistency. Its viewport checks use widths of 375px, 768px, 1280px, and 1920px.
The site must be running, and browser automation must support navigation, screenshots, and DOM access. To make changes, the project source must be available in the workspace. The skill detects the framework and styling approach from project files, makes minimal edits, then checks the result again. If one issue takes more than 3 fix attempts, it asks the user to weigh in.
Install it when you want a review to continue through code changes and re-checks. A read-only review does not require access to the source project.
What it helps with
- spot elements overflowing the viewport
- check whether a layout breaks on small screens
- find low contrast and missing keyboard focus states
- fix visual defects in project source files
- recheck pages after code changes
Example prompts for the agent
- Review the design at localhost and fix the mobile layout issues.
- Find overlapping elements and check this page for accessibility problems.
- Inspect the site, make minimal fixes, and check for regressions.
How to install web-design-reviewer
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill web-design-reviewer2GitHub CLI
gh skill install github/awesome-copilot web-design-reviewer3Manually: put the files in place
.github/skills/web-design-reviewer/SKILL.md1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill web-design-reviewer -a claude-code2Manually: put the files in place
~/.claude/skills/web-design-reviewer/SKILL.mdCopy the whole skill folder; for one project use .claude/skills/web-design-reviewer/
Manually: put the files in place
.agents/skills/web-design-reviewer/SKILL.mdFor all projects use ~/.agents/skills/
Manually: put the files in place
.cursor/skills/web-design-reviewer/SKILL.mdCursor also reads .agents/skills/ and .claude/skills/
Platform CLI
gemini skills install https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --path skills/web-design-reviewerManually: put the files in place
.devin/skills/web-design-reviewer/SKILL.mdThe legacy .windsurf/skills/ path still works
Claude.ai
Zip the folder and upload it in Settings → Capabilities → Skills
From the same set554
The whole set →Similar
Questions about web-design-reviewer
How do I install web-design-reviewer in GitHub Copilot?
Run npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill web-design-reviewer or gh skill install github/awesome-copilot web-design-reviewer.
What does web-design-reviewer do?
It inspects a running site in a browser, identifies interface issues, and edits the source when the project is available in the workspace. It then checks the result again.
What does the skill need to fix a website?
The site must be running, and browser automation must support screenshots, navigation, and DOM access. The source project must be in the workspace for code changes.
Source text
SKILL.md · MIT
---
name: web-design-reviewer
description: 'This skill enables visual inspection of websites running locally or remotely to identify and fix design issues. Triggers on requests like "review website design", "check the UI", "fix the layout", "find design problems". Detects issues with responsive design, accessibility, visual consistency, and layout breakage, then performs fixes at the source code level.'
---
# Web Design Reviewer
This skill enables visual inspection and validation of website design quality, identifying and fixing issues at the source code level.
## Scope of Application
- Static sites (HTML/CSS/JS)
- SPA frameworks such as React / Vue / Angular / Svelte
- Full-stack frameworks such as Next.js / Nuxt / SvelteKit
- CMS platforms such as WordPress / Drupal
- Any other web application
## Prerequisites
### Required
1. **Target website must be running**
- Local development server (e.g., `http://localhost:3000`)
- Staging environment
- Production environment (for read-only reviews)
2. **Browser automation must be available**
- Screenshot capture
- Page navigation
- DOM information retrieval
3. **Access to source code (when making fixes)**
- Project must exist within the workspace
## Workflow Overview
```mermaid
flowchart TD
A[Step 1: Information Gathering] --> B[Step 2: Visual Inspection]
B --> C[Step 3: Issue Fixing]
C --> D[Step 4: Re-verification]
D --> E{Issues Remaining?}
E -->|Yes| B
E -->|No| F[Completion Report]
```
---
## Step 1: Information Gathering Phase
### 1.1 URL Confirmation
If the URL is not provided, ask the user:
> Please provide the URL of the website to review (e.g., `http://localhost:3000`)
### 1.2 Understanding Project Structure
When making fixes, gather the following information:
| Item | Example Question |
|------|------------------|
| Framework | Are you using React / Vue / Next.js, etc.? |
| Styling Method | CSS / SCSS / Tailwind / CSS-in-JS, etc. |
| Source Location | Where are style files and components located? |
| Review Scope | Specific pages only or entire site? |
### 1.3 Automatic Project Detection
Attempt automatic detection from files in the workspace:
```
Detection targets:
├── package.json → Framework and dependencies
├── tsconfig.json → TypeScript usage
├── tailwind.config → Tailwind CSS
├── next.config → Next.js
├── vite.config → Vite
├── nuxt.config → Nuxt
└── src/ or app/ → Source directory
```
### 1.4 Identifying Styling Method
| Method | Detection | Edit Target |
|--------|-----------|-------------|
| Pure CSS | `*.css` files | Global CSS or component CSS |
| SCSS/Sass | `*.scss`, `*.sass` | SCSS files |
| CSS Modules | `*.module.css` | Module CSS files |
| Tailwind CSS | `tailwind.config.*` | className in components |
| styled-components | `styled.` in code | JS/TS files |
| Emotion | `@emotion/` imports | JS/TS files |
| CSS-in-JS (other) | Inline styles | JS/TS files |
---
## Step 2: Visual Inspection Phase
### 2.1 Page Traversal
1. Navigate to the specified URL
2. Capture screenshots
3. Retrieve DOM structure/snapshot (if possible)
4. If additional pages exist, traverse through navigation
### 2.2 Inspection Items
Work through [references/visual-checklist.md](references/visual-checklist.md) during inspection and again during post-fix verification.
#### Layout Issues
| Issue | Description | Severity |
|-------|-------------|----------|
| Element Overflow | Content overflows from parent element or viewport | High |
| Element Overlap | Unintended overlapping of elements | High |
| Alignment Issues | Grid or flex alignment problems | Medium |
| Inconsistent Spacing | Padding/margin inconsistencies | Medium |
| Text Clipping | Long text not handled properly | Medium |
#### Responsive Issues
| Issue | Description | Severity |
|-------|-------------|----------|
| Non-mobile Friendly | Layout breaks on small screens | High |
| Breakpoint Issues | Unnatural transitions when screen size changes | Medium |
| Touch Targets | Buttons too small on mobile | Medium |
#### Accessibility Issues
| Issue | Description | Severity |
|-------|-------------|----------|
| Insufficient Contrast | Low contrast ratio between text and background | High |
| No Focus State | Cannot determine state during keyboard navigation | High |
| Missing alt Text | No alternative text for images | Medium |
#### Visual Consistency
| Issue | Description | Severity |
|-------|-------------|----------|
| Font Inconsistency | Mixed font families | Medium |
| Color Inconsistency | Non-unified brand colors | Medium |
| Spacing Inconsistency | Non-uniform spacing between similar elements | Low |
### 2.3 Viewport Testing (Responsive)
Test at the following viewports:
| Name | Width | Representative Device |
|------|-------|----------------------|
| Mobile | 375px | iPhone SE/12 mini |
| Tablet | 768px | iPad |
| Desktop | 1280px | Standard PC |
| Wide | 1920px | Large display |
---
## Step 3: Issue Fixing Phase
### 3.1 Issue Prioritization
```mermaid
block-beta
columns 1
block:priority["Priority Matrix"]
P1["P1: Fix Immediately\n(Layout issues affecting functionality)"]
P2["P2: Fix Next\n(Visual issues degrading UX)"]
P3["P3: Fix If Possible\n(Minor visual inconsistencies)"]
end
```
### 3.2 Identifying Source Files
Identify source files from problematic elements:
1. **Selector-based Search**
- Search codebase by class name or ID
- Explore style definitions with `grep_search`
2. **Component-based Search**
- Identify components from element text or structure
- Explore related files with `semantic_search`
3. **File Pattern Filtering**
```
Style files: src/**/*.css, styles/**/*
Components: src/components/**/*
Pages: src/pages/**, app/**
```
### 3.3 Applying Fixes
#### Framework-specific Fix Guidelines
See [references/framework-fixes.md](references/framework-fixes.md) for details.
#### Fix Principles
1. **Minimal Changes**: Only make the minimum changes necessary to resolve the issue
2. **Respect Existing Patterns**: Follow existing code style in the project
3. **Avoid Breaking Changes**: Be careful not to affect other areas
4. **Add Comments**: Add comments to explain the reason for fixes where appropriate
---
## Step 4: Re-verification Phase
### 4.1 Post-fix Confirmation
1. Reload browser (or wait for development server HMR)
2. Capture screenshots of fixed areas
3. Compare before and after
### 4.2 Regression Testing
- Verify that fixes haven't affected other areas
- Confirm responsive display is not broken
### 4.3 Iteration Decision
```mermaid
flowchart TD
A{Issues Remaining?}
A -->|Yes| B[Return to Step 2]
A -->|No| C[Proceed to Completion Report]
```
**Iteration Limit**: If more than 3 fix attempts are needed for a specific issue, consult the user
---
## Output Format
### Review Results Report
```markdown
# Web Design Review Results
## Summary
| Item | Value |
|------|-------|
| Target URL | {URL} |
| Framework | {Detected framework} |
| Styling | {CSS / Tailwind / etc.} |
| Tested Viewports | Desktop, Mobile |
| Issues Detected | {N} |
| Issues Fixed | {M} |
## Detected Issues
### [P1] {Issue Title}
- **Page**: {Page path}
- **Element**: {Selector or description}
- **Issue**: {Detailed description of the issue}
- **Fixed File**: `{File path}`
- **Fix Details**: {Description of changes}
- **Screenshot**: Before/After
### [P2] {Issue Title}
...
## Unfixed Issues (if any)
### {Issue Title}
- **Reason**: {Why it was not fixed/could not be fixed}
- **Recommended Action**: {Recommendations for user}
## Recommendations
- {Suggestions for future improvements}
```
---
## Required Capabilities
| Capability | Description | Required |
|------------|-------------|----------|
| Web Page Navigation | Access URLs, page transitions | ✅ |
| Screenshot Capture | Page image capture | ✅ |
| Image Analysis | Visual issue detection | ✅ |
| DOM Retrieval | Page structure retrieval | Recommended |
| File Read/Write | Source code reading and editing | Required for fixes |
| Code Search | Code search within project | Required for fixes |
---
## Reference Implementation
### Implementation with Playwright MCP
[Playwright MCP](https://github.com/microsoft/playwright-mcp) is recommended as the reference implementation for this skill.
| Capability | Playwright MCP Tool | Purpose |
|------------|---------------------|---------|
| Navigation | `browser_navigate` | Access URLs |
| Snapshot | `browser_snapshot` | Retrieve DOM structure |
| Screenshot | `browser_take_screenshot` | Images for visual inspection |
| Click | `browser_click` | Interact with interactive elements |
| Resize | `browser_resize` | Responsive testing |
| Console | `browser_console_messages` | Detect JS errors |
#### Configuration Example (MCP Server)
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"playwright": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@playwright/mcp@latest", "--caps=vision"]
}
}
}
```
### Other Compatible Browser Automation Tools
| Tool | Features |
|------|----------|
| Selenium | Broad browser support, multi-language support |
| Puppeteer | Chrome/Chromium focused, Node.js |
| Cypress | Easy integration with E2E testing |
| WebDriver BiDi | Standardized next-generation protocol |
The same workflow can be implemented with these tools. As long as they provide the necessary capabilities (navigation, screenshot, DOM retrieval), the choice of tool is flexible.
---
## Best Practices
### DO (Recommended)
- ✅ Always save screenshots before making fixes
- ✅ Fix one issue at a time and verify each
- ✅ Follow the project's existing code style
- ✅ Confirm with user before major changes
- ✅ Document fix details thoroughly
### DON'T (Not Recommended)
- ❌ Large-scale refactoring without confirmation
- ❌ Ignoring design systems or brand guidelines
- ❌ Fixes that ignore performance
- ❌ Fixing multiple issues at once (difficult to verify)
---
## Troubleshooting
### Problem: Style files not found
1. Check dependencies in `package.json`
2. Consider the possibility of CSS-in-JS
3. Consider CSS generated at build time
4. Ask user about styling method
### Problem: Fixes not reflected
1. Check if development server HMR is working
2. Clear browser cache
3. Rebuild if project requires build
4. Check CSS specificity issues
### Problem: Fixes affecting other areas
1. Rollback changes
2. Use more specific selectors
3. Consider using CSS Modules or scoped styles
4. Consult user to confirm impact scope
© github · MIT · github/awesome-copilot