critique-brand-consistency — Claude Code skill: check a screen
Compares a rendered screen against mood.md, voice.md and tokens.md, then points out where styling and copy drifted from the brand.
npx skills add Owl-Listener/designer-skills --skill critique-brand-consistency -a claude-codeWhat critique-brand-consistency does
The skill reads three reference files from the project root. mood.md holds the brand personality and aesthetic direction, voice.md covers tone and language rules, tokens.md defines colour, spacing, radius, shadow and typography values. The screen is then checked on three axes: mood alignment, voice alignment and token compliance.
Each axis returns an observation, the divergence from the reference file, and the exact fix — the preferred wording or the correct token name. Every axis is rated pass, minor issue or major issue. Hardcoded values that should have come from tokens are listed separately, with their token equivalent.
If one of the three files is missing, that dimension is skipped rather than guessed at. So check that the files sit where you expect them before running the critique; otherwise you get a partial review. The author points to the illustration-style skill in the ui-design set for defining the visual language itself, not for auditing a finished screen.
What it helps with
- check a rendered screen against the brand personality notes
- find hardcoded hex values where a colour token belongs
- audit button labels and error messages against the voice guide
- spot mismatched radius and shadow values across one screen
- get the exact token name to replace a non-compliant value
Example prompts for the agent
- critique this screen against mood.md, voice.md and tokens.md
- run critique-brand-consistency on the settings page
- which values on this screen don't match tokens.md?
How to install critique-brand-consistency
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add Owl-Listener/designer-skills --skill critique-brand-consistency -a claude-code2Manually: put the files in place
~/.claude/skills/critique-brand-consistency/SKILL.mdCopy the whole skill folder; for one project use .claude/skills/critique-brand-consistency/
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add Owl-Listener/designer-skills --skill critique-brand-consistency -a codex2Manually: put the files in place
.agents/skills/critique-brand-consistency/SKILL.mdFor all projects use ~/.agents/skills/
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add Owl-Listener/designer-skills --skill critique-brand-consistency -a cursor2Manually: put the files in place
.cursor/skills/critique-brand-consistency/SKILL.mdCursor also reads .agents/skills/ and .claude/skills/
1GitHub CLI
gh skill install Owl-Listener/designer-skills critique-brand-consistency2Manually: put the files in place
.github/skills/critique-brand-consistency/SKILL.md1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add Owl-Listener/designer-skills --skill critique-brand-consistency -a gemini-cli2Platform CLI
gemini skills install https://github.com/Owl-Listener/designer-skills --path visual-critique/skills/critique-brand-consistencyManually: put the files in place
.devin/skills/critique-brand-consistency/SKILL.mdThe legacy .windsurf/skills/ path still works
Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add Owl-Listener/designer-skills --skill critique-brand-consistency -a opencodeClaude.ai
Zip the folder and upload it in Settings → Capabilities → Skills
Step by step, with commands for each platform: How to install skills in Claude Code: five ways
Questions about critique-brand-consistency
How do I install critique-brand-consistency in Claude?
Run npx skills add Owl-Listener/designer-skills --skill critique-brand-consistency -a claude-code. The skill file then lands at ~/.claude/skills/critique-brand-consistency/SKILL.md.
What does critique-brand-consistency do?
It compares a rendered screen with mood.md, voice.md and tokens.md, flags divergences in mood, voice and tokens, and suggests a fix for each.
What do I need before running it?
Three files in the project: mood.md, voice.md and tokens.md. When a file is missing, that dimension of the critique is skipped.
Source text
SKILL.md · MIT
--- name: critique-brand-consistency description: Critique a rendered screen against mood.md, voice.md, and tokens.md. Use when those brand files exist and you are checking compliance. For defining the visual language itself, use `illustration-style` (ui-design). --- # Critique Brand Consistency You are an expert in brand expression and design system compliance. ## What You Do You check whether a screen faithfully expresses the brand by comparing it against three project reference files: `mood.md` (personality and aesthetic direction), `voice.md` (tone and language guidelines), and `tokens.md` (design token definitions). Flag every divergence and suggest the correct value or approach. ## Reference Files Before critiquing, locate and read these files from the project root (or wherever the designer specifies): - **mood.md** — Brand personality, aesthetic keywords, visual references, do/don't examples - **voice.md** — Tone of voice, language style, copy do/don't rules, vocabulary - **tokens.md** — Canonical colour, spacing, radius, shadow, and typography token values If a file is missing, note this and skip that dimension — do not invent brand rules. ## Critique Dimensions ### Mood Alignment Compare the screen's aesthetic to the mood direction. - Does the visual language (imagery style, illustration, iconography, colour feel) match the brand personality keywords? - Are any elements tonally off — e.g., a playful brand using cold, corporate styling? - Does the overall emotional register of the screen match what the mood file prescribes? ### Voice Alignment Compare all visible copy to the voice guidelines. - Does the tone match (e.g., direct vs. conversational, formal vs. friendly)? - Are any prescribed vocabulary rules broken — forbidden words, required patterns? - Are CTAs, labels, error messages, and microcopy consistent with the voice? ### Token Compliance Compare every design value on screen to the token definitions. - Are hardcoded hex values used where a colour token should apply? - Are spacing, radius, or shadow values that deviate from tokens present? - Are typography tokens applied correctly, or are raw font-size/weight values used? - List every non-compliant value with its token equivalent. ## Output Format For each dimension — Mood, Voice, Token Compliance — provide: 1. **Observation** — what you see (neutral, factual) 2. **Divergence** — what conflicts with the reference file and why it matters 3. **Fix** — the exact correction (preferred wording, correct token name, etc.) Rate each dimension: `pass` / `minor issue` / `major issue`. ## Common Failure Patterns - Hardcoded values drifting from tokens over time - Copy written without consulting voice guidelines, defaulting to generic UI language - Imagery or illustration sourced outside the brand mood reference - Inconsistent radius or shadow values across components on the same screen
© Owl-Listener · MIT · Owl-Listener/designer-skills