Skip to main content
skill CX Codex

course-material-creator — Claude Code skill: course materials

A skill that scaffolds educational content: syllabi, lesson plans, rubrics and reading lists. Useful when you are building a course or a training program.

Install into Claude Code · Skills CLI (Vercel) All methods and platforms ↓
npx skills add travisjneuman/.claude --skill course-material-creator -a claude-code
Open on GitHub

What course-material-creator does

The skill ships ready-made frameworks for designing instruction, from the syllabus down to assessment. Inside there is a syllabus template with slots for objectives, prerequisites, a grading scale and a week-by-week schedule, plus a single-lesson template broken into minutes and a verb table based on Bloom's taxonomy for writing learning objectives.

A separate section covers engagement techniques: Think-Pair-Share, Jigsaw, case study, gallery walk, muddiest point, each with a duration and a note on when it fits. Assessment gets its own block — a table of assignment types (multiple choice, essay, project, portfolio, peer review) and a rubric template with criteria and four quality levels.

Everything here is text: templates and tables, not a document generator. You supply the subject matter, the topics and the criteria. The skill supplies the structure and the phrasing of objectives, and it takes facts about your subject from your prompt.

What it helps with

  • draft a syllabus with objectives, schedule and grading scale
  • lay out a single lesson by minutes with different activity types
  • write learning objectives using Bloom's taxonomy verbs
  • pick an assignment type that matches the skill you want to test
  • sketch a rubric with criteria and quality levels

Example prompts for the agent

  • Build a syllabus for an 8-week Python course, two sessions a week, graded by a project and quizzes
  • Write an 80-minute lesson plan on regression with guided and independent practice
  • Give me five learning objectives for an intro marketing module and matching assignment types

How to install course-material-creator

1Skills CLI (Vercel)

npx skills add travisjneuman/.claude --skill course-material-creator -a claude-code

2Manually: put the files in place

~/.claude/skills/course-material-creator/SKILL.md

Copy the whole skill folder; for one project use .claude/skills/course-material-creator/

Step by step, with commands for each platform: How to install skills in Claude Code: five ways

Questions about course-material-creator

How do I install course-material-creator in Claude?

Run npx skills add travisjneuman/.claude --skill course-material-creator -a claude-code. The skill lands in ~/.claude/skills/course-material-creator/SKILL.md.

What does course-material-creator do?

It builds course materials from templates: syllabus, lesson plan, rubric, reading list and learning objectives. Works for formal courses and corporate training alike.

Does the skill invent the course content?

No. It provides structure and phrasing; you bring the topics, criteria and materials in your prompt.

Source text

SKILL.md · MIT
---
name: course-material-creator
description: Create custom educational materials including syllabi, lesson plans, assessments, reading lists, and learning objectives. Use when building course curricula, training programs, workshops, or educational content.
---

# Course Material Creator

Frameworks for designing structured educational experiences from syllabus creation through assessment design, supporting formal courses, corporate training, and self-directed learning programs.

## Syllabus Design

### Syllabus Template

```
COURSE SYLLABUS

COURSE TITLE: ______________________________
INSTRUCTOR: ________________________________
TERM/DATES: ________________________________
MEETING TIME: ______________________________
LOCATION: __________________________________

COURSE DESCRIPTION (2-3 sentences):
[What the course covers and why it matters]

LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
By the end of this course, students will be able to:
  1. [Verb] + [specific knowledge/skill] + [context/conditions]
  2. [Verb] + [specific knowledge/skill] + [context/conditions]
  3. [Verb] + [specific knowledge/skill] + [context/conditions]
  4. [Verb] + [specific knowledge/skill] + [context/conditions]
  5. [Verb] + [specific knowledge/skill] + [context/conditions]

PREREQUISITES:
  - [Required prior knowledge or courses]
  - [Required tools or materials]

REQUIRED MATERIALS:
  - [Textbook, software, supplies]

GRADING / ASSESSMENT:
  Component              | Weight | Due Dates
  Participation          | ___%   | Ongoing
  Assignments (N)        | ___%   | Weekly/Biweekly
  Midterm project/exam   | ___%   | Week __
  Final project/exam     | ___%   | Week __

GRADING SCALE:
  A: 93-100  A-: 90-92  B+: 87-89  B: 83-86  B-: 80-82
  C+: 77-79  C: 73-76   C-: 70-72  D: 60-69  F: <60

COURSE SCHEDULE:
  Week 1:  [Topic] — Reading: [Ch. X] — Due: [Assignment]
  Week 2:  [Topic] — Reading: [Ch. X] — Due: [Assignment]
  ...
  Week N:  [Topic] — Final project due

POLICIES:
  Late work: [Policy]
  Attendance: [Policy]
  Academic integrity: [Policy]
  Accommodations: [Statement]
```

### Learning Objective Verbs (Bloom's Taxonomy)

| Level | Verbs | Example Objective |
|-------|-------|-------------------|
| **Remember** | Define, list, recall, identify, name, recognize | "List the five phases of project management" |
| **Understand** | Explain, describe, summarize, interpret, classify | "Explain the relationship between supply and demand" |
| **Apply** | Use, implement, solve, demonstrate, calculate | "Apply regression analysis to a real-world dataset" |
| **Analyze** | Compare, contrast, examine, differentiate, organize | "Analyze competing business strategies and identify trade-offs" |
| **Evaluate** | Assess, critique, justify, recommend, judge | "Evaluate the effectiveness of three marketing campaigns" |
| **Create** | Design, construct, develop, formulate, produce | "Design a database schema for a multi-tenant application" |

## Lesson Plan Design

### Single Lesson Template

```
LESSON PLAN

Topic: _________________________________
Duration: _______ minutes
Week/Session: __________________________
Prerequisites: _________________________

LEARNING OBJECTIVES (this lesson):
  Students will be able to:
  1. [Objective]
  2. [Objective]

MATERIALS NEEDED:
  - [Slides, handouts, tools, datasets]

LESSON STRUCTURE:

  TIME    | ACTIVITY          | METHOD          | NOTES
  --------|-------------------|-----------------|----------
  0-5     | Opening hook      | Story/question  | Engage interest
  5-15    | Review prior      | Q&A / quiz      | Connect to today
  15-35   | New content       | Lecture + demo   | Core concepts
  35-50   | Guided practice   | Pair exercise    | Apply with support
  50-65   | Independent work  | Solo exercise    | Apply independently
  65-75   | Debrief + Q&A     | Discussion       | Clarify and extend
  75-80   | Preview next      | Summary          | Connect forward

DIFFERENTIATION:
  Struggling learners: [Scaffolding or alternative]
  Advanced learners: [Extension activity]

ASSESSMENT:
  Formative: [How you'll check understanding during class]
  Summative: [How this connects to graded assessment]

REFLECTION (post-lesson):
  - What worked well?
  - What would I change?
  - What do students need more practice on?
```

### Engagement Techniques

| Technique | Duration | Best For | Description |
|-----------|----------|----------|-------------|
| **Think-Pair-Share** | 5-10 min | Concept processing | Think alone, discuss with partner, share with class |
| **Jigsaw** | 20-30 min | Complex topics | Groups each learn one piece, then teach each other |
| **Case Study** | 30-60 min | Application | Analyze real-world scenario, propose solutions |
| **Gallery Walk** | 15-20 min | Peer review | Post work around room, students circulate and comment |
| **Muddiest Point** | 3-5 min | Checking understanding | Students write what confused them most |
| **Minute Paper** | 3-5 min | Reflection | "What was the most important thing you learned today?" |
| **Fishbowl** | 15-20 min | Discussion skills | Inner circle discusses, outer circle observes |
| **Role Play** | 15-30 min | Soft skills | Act out scenarios (negotiation, feedback, sales) |

## Assessment Design

### Assessment Types and When to Use

| Assessment Type | Purpose | Measures | Best For |
|----------------|---------|----------|----------|
| **Multiple choice** | Knowledge recall | Recognition, basic understanding | Large classes, quick grading |
| **Short answer** | Comprehension | Explanation, application | Mid-depth understanding |
| **Essay** | Analysis/synthesis | Critical thinking, argumentation | Deep understanding |
| **Project** | Application/creation | Practical skills, creativity | Real-world competency |
| **Presentation** | Communication | Public speaking, synthesis | Explaining complex topics |
| **Portfolio** | Growth over time | Cumulative progress, reflection | Long-term skill development |
| **Peer review** | Evaluation skills | Critical analysis, feedback | Collaborative learning |
| **Practical/lab** | Hands-on skills | Technical execution | Applied/technical courses |

### Rubric Design Template

```
RUBRIC: [Assignment Name]

Criteria        | Excellent (4)      | Good (3)          | Adequate (2)      | Needs Work (1)
----------------|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----------------
[Criterion 1]   | [Description of    | [Description of    | [Description of    | [Description of
                | excellent work]    | good work]         | adequate work]     | poor work]
                |                    |                    |                    |
[Criterion 2]   | [Description]      | [Description]      | [Description]      | [Description]
                |                    |                    |                    |
[Criterion 3]   | [Description]      | [Description]      | [Description]      | [Description]
                |                    |                    |                    |
[Criterion 4]   | [Description]      | [Description]      | [Description]      | [Description]

SCORING:
  Total points: ___ / [Max]
  Weight: ___% of final grade
```

## Reading List Curation

### Reading Selection Framework

```
READING LIST CURATION:

FOR EACH READING, EVALUATE:
  Relevance:     Does it directly support learning objectives?
  Accessibility: Is the reading level appropriate?
  Recency:       Is the information current? (or intentionally historical?)
  Diversity:     Does the list include varied perspectives?
  Length:         Is the total reading load reasonable?

READING LOAD GUIDELINES:
  Undergraduate:  30-50 pages/week
  Graduate:       50-100 pages/week
  Professional:   20-40 pages/week (busy professionals)
  Self-directed:  Learner's pace (provide suggested schedule)

CATEGORIZATION:
  Required:    Must read before class/session
  Recommended: Deepens understanding of required material
  Reference:   Available for future use/specific needs
  Optional:    For highly interested learners
```

### Annotated Reading List Template

```
READING LIST: [Course Name]

WEEK 1: [Topic]
  REQUIRED:
  - [Author]. "[Title]." [Source], [Year]. [Pages/sections].
    Why: [1 sentence on what this reading contributes]

  RECOMMENDED:
  - [Author]. "[Title]." [Source], [Year].
    Why: [1 sentence on supplementary value]

WEEK 2: [Topic]
  ...
```

## Curriculum Mapping

### Course-Level Alignment

```
CURRICULUM MAP:

Program Objective    | Course(s)           | Assessment           | Bloom's Level
---------------------|---------------------|----------------------|-------------
[Program obj 1]      | [Course A, Week 3]  | [Assignment type]    | Apply
                     | [Course B, Week 7]  | [Project component]  | Create
[Program obj 2]      | [Course A, Week 5]  | [Exam question]      | Analyze
                     | [Course C, Week 2]  | [Case study]         | Evaluate
```

### Backward Design Process

```
BACKWARD DESIGN (Understanding by Design):

STAGE 1: DESIRED RESULTS
  What should students know and be able to do?
  - Enduring understandings (big ideas that last)
  - Essential questions (driving inquiry)
  - Learning objectives (specific, measurable)

STAGE 2: ASSESSMENT EVIDENCE
  How will you know students have learned?
  - Performance tasks (authentic assessment)
  - Other evidence (quizzes, observations, self-assessment)
  - Criteria for success (rubrics, checklists)

STAGE 3: LEARNING PLAN
  What experiences will enable learning?
  - Instructional activities (lessons, labs, discussions)
  - Sequence and pacing (build from simple to complex)
  - Resources and materials (readings, tools, examples)
  - Differentiation (support and extension)
```

## Workshop and Training Design

### Workshop Template

```
WORKSHOP DESIGN: [Title]
Duration: [X hours/days]
Audience: [Who and their level]
Max Participants: [N]

PRE-WORK (if any):
  - [Reading, video, or self-assessment]

AGENDA:
  TIME        ACTIVITY                    FORMAT
  9:00-9:15   Welcome and introductions   Icebreaker
  9:15-9:30   Learning objectives + agenda Overview
  9:30-10:30  Module 1: [Topic]           Lecture + exercise
  10:30-10:45 Break
  10:45-12:00 Module 2: [Topic]           Case study + discussion
  12:00-1:00  Lunch
  1:00-2:30   Module 3: [Topic]           Hands-on workshop
  2:30-2:45   Break
  2:45-3:45   Application exercise        Group project
  3:45-4:15   Presentations               Group share-outs
  4:15-4:30   Wrap-up and evaluation      Reflection + survey

MATERIALS CHECKLIST:
  [ ] Slide deck
  [ ] Handouts/workbooks
  [ ] Exercise materials
  [ ] Name tags
  [ ] Evaluation forms
  [ ] Supplies (markers, sticky notes, etc.)

POST-WORKSHOP:
  - Send follow-up email with resources
  - Share slide deck and recordings
  - Collect and review evaluations
  - Schedule follow-up session (if applicable)
```

## See Also

- [Learning Gap Analyzer](../learning-gap-analyzer/SKILL.md)
- [Research Presenter](../research-presenter/SKILL.md)
- [Literature Review Planner](../literature-review-planner/SKILL.md)

© travisjneuman · MIT · travisjneuman/.claude

Similar skills

Everything for Writing and docs →

From the same set6

Project sponsors

Companies that keep this analytics open
Gold sponsor

Impressions, clicks and code copies — open statistics. We keep the numbers public for the same reason NeBlask itself is public. Become a sponsor