vectorization — Claude Code skill: what it does, how to install
Guides SIMD code design, implementation, and review in .NET projects. Useful when vectorizing scalar loops or auditing low-level vector memory safety.
npx skills add dotnet/skills --skill vectorization -a claude-codeWhat vectorization does
The skill establishes optimization workflows for .NET code using TensorPrimitives, Vector64/128/256/512, and architecture-specific hardware intrinsics. It enforces checking highest-level framework APIs first, including Span<T> routines, string methods, and accelerated LINQ reductions like Sum or Max. If an existing framework API satisfies the contract, writing handwritten SIMD loops is stopped immediately.
Explicit SIMD authoring begins with Vector128<T> due to broad hardware support. Properties such as IsHardwareAccelerated, IsSupported, and Count must be inspected directly; caching them is unnecessary because the JIT treats them as constants. Buffer handling follows strict memory rules: base references for empty spans come from MemoryMarshal.GetReference rather than indexing element zero, while remaining tails are covered by overlapping the last full vector or masking with ConditionalSelect.
The authoring checklist strictly prohibits applying this skill to performance work unrelated to SIMD or vectorization, preventing needless complexity in standard algorithms.
What it helps with
- vectorize scalar loops using
TensorPrimitivesorVector128<T> - review existing .NET SIMD methods for memory safety and tail handling
- choose cross-platform vector operations before resorting to hardware intrinsics
- audit span buffer loading with
MemoryMarshalinstead of raw pointers
Example prompts for the agent
- Vectorize this scalar loop over a float array using TensorPrimitives or Vector128.
- Review this SIMD implementation for tail handling and empty input safety.
- Refactor this byte matching logic to Vector128<byte> with an IsHardwareAccelerated check.
How to install vectorization
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add dotnet/skills --skill vectorization -a claude-code2Manually: put the files in place
~/.claude/skills/vectorization/SKILL.mdCopy the whole skill folder; for one project use .claude/skills/vectorization/
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add dotnet/skills --skill vectorization -a codex2Manually: put the files in place
.agents/skills/vectorization/SKILL.mdFor all projects use ~/.agents/skills/
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add dotnet/skills --skill vectorization -a cursor2Manually: put the files in place
.cursor/skills/vectorization/SKILL.mdCursor also reads .agents/skills/ and .claude/skills/
1GitHub CLI
gh skill install dotnet/skills vectorization2Manually: put the files in place
.github/skills/vectorization/SKILL.md1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add dotnet/skills --skill vectorization -a gemini-cli2Platform CLI
gemini skills install https://github.com/dotnet/skills --path plugins/dotnet-advanced/skills/vectorizationManually: put the files in place
.devin/skills/vectorization/SKILL.mdThe legacy .windsurf/skills/ path still works
Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add dotnet/skills --skill vectorization -a opencodeClaude.ai
Zip the folder and upload it in Settings → Capabilities → Skills
Step by step, with commands for each platform: How to install skills in Claude Code: five ways
Questions about vectorization
How to install vectorization in Claude Code?
Run npx skills add dotnet/skills --skill vectorization -a claude-code in your terminal.
What does the vectorization skill do?
It guides the design, implementation, and review of .NET SIMD code using TensorPrimitives, fixed-width vector types from Vector64 to Vector512, and hardware intrinsics.
Why does the guidance start with Vector128?
Explicit loops start with Vector128<T> because it runs hardware-accelerated across the widest hardware targets. Broader paths like Vector256 or Vector512 are added only when measured benchmarks justify them.
Source text
SKILL.md · MIT
---
name: vectorization
description: >
Design, implement, optimize, and review SIMD code in .NET.
USE FOR: vectorizing scalar loops with TensorPrimitives,
Vector64/128/256/512, or platform hardware intrinsics; reviewing existing SIMD
code, including the generic Vector type, for contract equivalence, tail handling, memory
safety, portability, fallbacks, and measured performance. DO NOT USE FOR:
performance work unrelated to SIMD or vectorization.
license: MIT
---
# .NET SIMD vectorization
Produce a portable optimization that preserves the scalar contract, remains memory-safe at every
length, and earns its complexity with measured results. **Read the official
[SIMD and hardware-intrinsics guidance](https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/standard/simd) first**
and follow its comprehensive implementation templates. In particular, use its self-contained
per-width dispatch, dedicated small-input handling, loop, and remainder shapes rather than reducing
them to a chain of width checks. This skill supplies the decision rules and validation checks to
apply while changing real code.
## Inputs and prerequisites
Discover these from the repository before asking the user:
| Input | Required | What to establish |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Scalar implementation and tests | Yes | Existing contract, representative call sites, and supported overlap |
| Target frameworks and platforms | Yes | Available SIMD APIs and architectures that must behave consistently |
| Build and test workflow | Yes | The repository's normal commands and how to launch separate test processes |
| Representative workload or benchmark | For optimization | Typical input sizes and the baseline to beat |
Do not add a package merely because an API exists there. First check the target framework and the
project's existing dependency/versioning policy.
## Core rules
1. **Use the highest-level API that matches the contract, then stop.** `Span<T>` and `string`
operations, `TensorPrimitives`, and tensor types already accelerate many operations. LINQ
reductions such as `Sum`, `Min`, `Max`, and `Average` can also accelerate when the source exposes
its underlying span. Verify empty-input and floating-point behavior rather than assuming similarly
named operations are interchangeable. Once an existing API preserves the contract, use it instead
of continuing into handwritten SIMD. Before writing an explicit loop, name the framework APIs
considered and why none applies. Fixed-shape `System.Numerics` types remain appropriate for
graphics and similar domains.
2. **Start new explicit SIMD loops with `Vector128<T>`.** It is accelerated across the broadest
hardware set. Add wider fixed-width paths only when measurements justify them.
3. **Keep platforms consistent.** Prefer cross-platform operations on the fixed-width vector types;
they lower to the appropriate target instructions. For example,
`(vector & mask) == Vector128<byte>.Zero` becomes `ptest` on x86/x64. Use
architecture-specific intrinsics only for a measured gap, guard them with `IsSupported`, and
retain equivalent portable or scalar behavior.
4. **Read `IsHardwareAccelerated`, `IsSupported`, and `Count` directly.** The JIT treats them as
constants, so caching them adds no value and obscures which branches disappear.
5. **Prefer operators where they are clear.** Parenthesize expressions that mix bitwise and
comparison operators so precedence is explicit.
If the task is review-only, do not rewrite the code. Report correctness and memory-safety defects
before performance opportunities.
## Authoring checklist
- **Contract:** identify behavior for empty and short inputs, overlap, overflow, NaN, signed zero,
ordering, and exceptions before changing the implementation.
- **Framework gate:** inspect the target framework and existing package references, then compile or
probe the highest-level candidate API with the required edge cases. A small contract adapter, such
as preserving special empty-input behavior, does not justify reimplementing the operation. If the
API preserves the contract, use it and stop; do not claim it is unavailable without checking.
- **Structure:** for new explicit SIMD, implement `Vector128<T>` and scalar first. Only after
measurements justify wider paths, check `Vector512<T>`, then `Vector256<T>`, optional `Vector<T>`,
`Vector128<T>`, and finally scalar. Omit paths the implementation does not need. Each outer
fixed-width guard checks only its `IsHardwareAccelerated` property and, for generic element types,
`IsSupported`. Inside that block, run the width-specific helper when the input has at least
`Count` elements; otherwise run a dedicated small-input helper, then return. Do not put the length
check in the outer guard and fall through to repeat dispatch at narrower widths. Keeping each
supported-width block self-contained lets the JIT remove unsupported blocks and avoids redundant
work on common small inputs.
- **Loads and stores:** prefer span-based `Vector128.Create(span)` and `CopyTo`; the JIT keeps them
efficient and they require no pinning or reference arithmetic. Unsafe loads and stores are largely
unnecessary. When a path genuinely must walk a buffer by managed reference, use the element-offset
`LoadUnsafe(ref T, nuint)` and `StoreUnsafe` overloads rather than pointers or manually advanced
references.
- **Empty inputs:** in a reference-based path, obtain the starting reference with
`MemoryMarshal.GetReference(span)` or `MemoryMarshal.GetArrayDataReference(array)`, not by indexing
element `0`.
- **Unsupported element types:** the fixed-width vectors support primitive numeric element types,
not `char` or `bool`. Reinterpret with `MemoryMarshal.Cast` or `As<TFrom, TTo>`; reinterpretation
changes only the type, not the bits. Keep Boolean data as `0` or `1` and characters as valid
UTF-16, normalizing results before storing when necessary.
- **Offsets:** prove the input contains a full vector before subtracting `Count` or converting an
index to `nuint`; otherwise a negative value becomes a huge unsigned offset.
- **Managed references:** do not form references before the start or past the end of a span,
including a one-past-end reference. The runtime permits a non-dereferenced managed pointer exactly
one past an object or array, but this guidance intentionally prohibits the pattern because it is
fragile and easy to misuse. Keep the base reference in range and express traversal with an element
offset.
- **Remainders:** cover every length, including `0`, `Count - 1`, `Count`, `Count + 1`, and
nonmultiples of each width. Once the input contains a full vector, keep the tail vectorized by
reprocessing the last full vector. An idempotent operation can fold that overlap in directly. A
non-idempotent operation must use `ConditionalSelect` to replace repeated lanes with the
operation's identity before folding them in. This is the JIT-recognized general pattern; it can
reduce a zero-identity selection to a bitwise mask while retaining broader optimization
opportunities. For in-place transforms, preserve the original tail values before overlapping
stores and write only valid results.
- **Buffer overlap:** choose a traversal direction or staging strategy that prevents stores from
corrupting values not yet loaded.
- **Numeric behavior:** account for floating-point reassociation, NaN and signed-zero semantics,
checked or unchecked integer overflow, and endianness where the algorithm depends on byte order.
`Native` and `Estimate` operations can intentionally relax precision or IEEE edge-case behavior;
use them only when the contract permits it and measurements justify them.
The official guidance contains the complete dispatch, small-input, unrolling, and remainder
templates; use those for the full implementation. The following excerpt illustrates only the inner
safe `Vector128<T>` loop for an in-place elementwise transform, after its self-contained dispatch
block has established at least one full vector. `Transform` represents the operation being
implemented:
```csharp
Span<int> tail = data.Slice(data.Length - Vector128<int>.Count);
Vector128<int> end = Vector128.Create<int>(tail);
Span<int> remaining = data;
while (remaining.Length >= Vector128<int>.Count)
{
Vector128<int> values = Vector128.Create<int>(remaining);
Transform(values).CopyTo(remaining);
remaining = remaining.Slice(Vector128<int>.Count);
}
if (!remaining.IsEmpty)
{
Transform(end).CopyTo(tail);
}
```
The early `end` load preserves original values before overlapping stores. For a read-only reduction,
load the same final span after the main loop and use `ConditionalSelect` to replace already-processed
lanes with the operation's identity. Do not substitute `LoadUnsafe`/`StoreUnsafe` or a scalar
epilogue merely to avoid span bounds checks.
## Testing checklist
- Compare the optimized implementation with the scalar contract across boundary lengths,
randomized values, empty inputs, supported overlap, and numeric edge cases. Cover every
implemented width and the scalar path with inputs both large enough and too small to benefit.
- Exercise every implemented width and the scalar fallback in separate processes. On x86/x64
CoreCLR, `DOTNET_EnableAVX2=0` disables AVX2 and `DOTNET_EnableHWIntrinsic=0` disables hardware
intrinsics. Use the repository's normal test command and do not change these process-wide
settings inside a unit test. These settings do not change code already compiled as ReadyToRun or
ahead of time, so confirm the target code is JIT-compiled when using them to force a path.
- For unsafe loads and stores, use guard-page or equivalent boundary tests when available. Put the
inaccessible page after the buffer for forward iteration and before it for backwards iteration,
and include nonmultiple lengths. An ordinary array allocation does not reliably expose an
out-of-bounds read.
## Benchmarking
Use BenchmarkDotNet to measure representative small and large inputs before keeping the added
complexity. Compare scalar, `Vector128<T>`, and each wider implemented path in the same run. Small
inputs can be slower because setup dominates, and speedups are rarely the theoretical vector-width
multiple because memory throughput, alignment, and latency still apply. Report throughput or time
with noise context and, when relevant, generated code size or instruction counts. Control allocation
alignment for stable measurements or randomize it to observe the distribution. A wider vector is
not automatically faster.
If the project cannot target the required framework, run the relevant architecture, or execute the
fallback configuration, state exactly which path remains unverified. Do not claim success from a
default-hardware test alone.
## Completion contract
- **Authoring:** leave the scalar contract covered by tests; identify the framework or SIMD layer
selected; report measurements for the representative workload; name any architecture or fallback
path that could not be exercised.
- **Review:** report only concrete findings, ordered by correctness, memory safety, portability,
tests, then performance evidence. If none remain, say so directly.
- Do not call an optimization complete when it only builds, only passes on the current machine, or
has no comparison against the scalar baseline.
## Review checklist
Review in this order:
1. Scalar-contract equivalence, including signed zero, NaN, overflow, and relevant endianness
2. Reuse of an existing accelerated framework API
3. Tail correctness for idempotent versus non-idempotent work
4. Memory safety, unsigned offset arithmetic, empty inputs, and overlapping buffers
5. Portable dispatch and behaviorally equivalent fallbacks
6. Tests that force each width and the scalar path
7. Benchmarks that justify explicit SIMD and additional widths
© dotnet · MIT · dotnet/skills