type-design-performance — Claude Code skill for faster .NET types
A skill that steers .NET type design toward performance: sealed classes, readonly structs, deferred enumeration, the right collection for the job.
npx skills add Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill type-design-performance -a claude-code
npx skills add Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill csharp-type-design-performance -a claude-codeWhat type-design-performance does
The skill fires when you design new types and APIs, review code for performance problems, or pick between a class, a struct and a record. It lays down five rules: seal types unless inheritance is intentional, prefer readonly struct for small immutable values, favour static pure functions, defer enumeration, and return immutable collections from API boundaries.
Each rule comes with C# examples. There is a table for struct-versus-class decisions, a ValueTask section with three hard rules (never await one twice, never touch .Result before completion, use Task when unsure), and a Span<T> / Memory<T> section for byte handling. On enumeration the advice is blunt: a LINQ chain with a ToList() in the middle materialises the collection twice.
This is not a skill to leave on everywhere. In a plain CRUD service with no hot paths, JIT devirtualisation and defensive struct copies change nothing measurable, and the review noise is real. It earns its place in code where allocations and extra passes over collections already show up in a profiler.
What it helps with
- pick between class, struct and record for a new type
- drop a redundant materialisation from a LINQ chain
- spot defensive copies caused by mutable structs
- decide where
ValueTaskpays off and whereTaskis enough - seal classes and records so the JIT can devirtualise calls
Example prompts for the agent
- Review this file against type-design-performance: where is the extra ToList and which classes should be sealed?
- Design an OrderId type following the type-design-performance skill
- Check this async code — where should Task become ValueTask per type-design-performance?
How to install type-design-performance
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill type-design-performance -a claude-codenpx skills add Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill csharp-type-design-performance -a claude-code2Manually: put the files in place
~/.claude/skills/csharp-type-design-performance/SKILL.mdCopy the whole skill folder; for one project use .claude/skills/csharp-type-design-performance/
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill csharp-type-design-performance -a codex2Manually: put the files in place
.agents/skills/csharp-type-design-performance/SKILL.mdFor all projects use ~/.agents/skills/
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill csharp-type-design-performance -a cursor2Manually: put the files in place
.cursor/skills/csharp-type-design-performance/SKILL.mdCursor also reads .agents/skills/ and .claude/skills/
1GitHub CLI
gh skill install Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills csharp-type-design-performance2Manually: put the files in place
.github/skills/csharp-type-design-performance/SKILL.md1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill csharp-type-design-performance -a gemini-cli2Platform CLI
gemini skills install https://github.com/Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --path skills/csharp-type-design-performanceManually: put the files in place
.devin/skills/csharp-type-design-performance/SKILL.mdThe legacy .windsurf/skills/ path still works
Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill csharp-type-design-performance -a opencodeClaude.ai
Zip the folder and upload it in Settings → Capabilities → Skills
Step by step, with commands for each platform: How to install skills in Claude Code: five ways
Questions about type-design-performance
How do I install type-design-performance in Claude?
Run npx skills add Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill type-design-performance -a claude-code. Alternatively use npx skills add Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill csharp-type-design-performance -a claude-code, which puts the file at ~/.claude/skills/csharp-type-design-performance/SKILL.md.
What does type-design-performance do?
It gives the agent a set of .NET type design rules: seal classes, use readonly struct, prefer static pure functions, avoid premature enumeration, and choose collection types deliberately.
Which platforms support the skill?
Besides Claude it installs into Claude, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI and OpenCode, each with its own install command.
Source text
SKILL.md · MIT
---
name: type-design-performance
description: Design .NET types for performance. Seal classes, use readonly structs, prefer static pure functions, avoid premature enumeration, and choose the right collection types.
user-invocable: false
---
# Type Design for Performance
## When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Designing new types and APIs
- Reviewing code for performance issues
- Choosing between class, struct, and record
- Working with collections and enumerables
---
## Core Principles
1. **Seal your types** - Unless explicitly designed for inheritance
2. **Prefer readonly structs** - For small, immutable value types
3. **Prefer static pure functions** - Better performance and testability
4. **Defer enumeration** - Don't materialize until you need to
5. **Return immutable collections** - From API boundaries
---
## Seal Classes by Default
Sealing classes enables JIT devirtualization and communicates API intent.
```csharp
// DO: Seal classes not designed for inheritance
public sealed class OrderProcessor
{
public void Process(Order order) { }
}
// DO: Seal records (they're classes)
public sealed record OrderCreated(OrderId Id, CustomerId CustomerId);
// DON'T: Leave unsealed without reason
public class OrderProcessor // Can be subclassed - intentional?
{
public virtual void Process(Order order) { } // Virtual = slower
}
```
**Benefits:**
- JIT can devirtualize method calls
- Communicates "this is not an extension point"
- Prevents accidental breaking changes
---
## Readonly Structs for Value Types
Structs should be `readonly` when immutable. This prevents defensive copies.
```csharp
// DO: Readonly struct for immutable value types
public readonly record struct OrderId(Guid Value)
{
public static OrderId New() => new(Guid.NewGuid());
public override string ToString() => Value.ToString();
}
// DO: Readonly struct for small, short-lived data
public readonly struct Money
{
public decimal Amount { get; }
public string Currency { get; }
public Money(decimal amount, string currency)
{
Amount = amount;
Currency = currency;
}
}
// DON'T: Mutable struct (causes defensive copies)
public struct Point // Not readonly!
{
public int X { get; set; } // Mutable!
public int Y { get; set; }
}
```
### When to Use Structs
| Use Struct When | Use Class When |
|-----------------|----------------|
| Small (≤16 bytes typically) | Larger objects |
| Short-lived | Long-lived |
| Frequently allocated | Shared references needed |
| Value semantics required | Identity semantics required |
| Immutable | Mutable state |
---
## Prefer Static Pure Functions
Static methods with no side effects are faster and more testable.
```csharp
// DO: Static pure function
public static class OrderCalculator
{
public static Money CalculateTotal(IReadOnlyList<OrderItem> items)
{
var total = items.Sum(i => i.Price * i.Quantity);
return new Money(total, "USD");
}
}
// Usage - predictable, testable
var total = OrderCalculator.CalculateTotal(items);
```
**Benefits:**
- No vtable lookup (faster)
- No hidden state
- Easier to test (pure input → output)
- Thread-safe by design
- Forces explicit dependencies
```csharp
// DON'T: Instance method hiding dependencies
public class OrderCalculator
{
private readonly ITaxService _taxService; // Hidden dependency
private readonly IDiscountService _discountService; // Hidden dependency
public Money CalculateTotal(IReadOnlyList<OrderItem> items)
{
// What does this actually depend on?
}
}
// BETTER: Explicit dependencies via parameters
public static class OrderCalculator
{
public static Money CalculateTotal(
IReadOnlyList<OrderItem> items,
decimal taxRate,
decimal discountPercent)
{
// All inputs visible
}
}
```
**Don't go overboard** - Use instance methods when you genuinely need state or polymorphism.
---
## Defer Enumeration
Don't materialize enumerables until necessary. Avoid excessive LINQ chains.
```csharp
// BAD: Premature materialization
public IReadOnlyList<Order> GetActiveOrders()
{
return _orders
.Where(o => o.IsActive)
.ToList() // Materialized!
.OrderBy(o => o.CreatedAt) // Another iteration
.ToList(); // Materialized again!
}
// GOOD: Defer until the end
public IReadOnlyList<Order> GetActiveOrders()
{
return _orders
.Where(o => o.IsActive)
.OrderBy(o => o.CreatedAt)
.ToList(); // Single materialization
}
// GOOD: Return IEnumerable if caller might not need all items
public IEnumerable<Order> GetActiveOrders()
{
return _orders
.Where(o => o.IsActive)
.OrderBy(o => o.CreatedAt);
// Caller decides when to materialize
}
```
### Async Enumeration
Be careful with async and IEnumerable:
```csharp
// BAD: Async in LINQ - hidden allocations
var results = orders
.Select(async o => await ProcessOrderAsync(o)) // Task per item!
.ToList();
await Task.WhenAll(results);
// GOOD: Use IAsyncEnumerable for streaming
public async IAsyncEnumerable<OrderResult> ProcessOrdersAsync(
IEnumerable<Order> orders,
[EnumeratorCancellation] CancellationToken ct = default)
{
foreach (var order in orders)
{
ct.ThrowIfCancellationRequested();
yield return await ProcessOrderAsync(order, ct);
}
}
// GOOD: Batch processing for parallelism
var results = await Task.WhenAll(
orders.Select(o => ProcessOrderAsync(o)));
```
---
## ValueTask vs Task
Use `ValueTask` for hot paths that often complete synchronously. For real I/O, just use `Task`.
```csharp
// DO: ValueTask for cached/synchronous paths
public ValueTask<User?> GetUserAsync(UserId id)
{
if (_cache.TryGetValue(id, out var user))
{
return ValueTask.FromResult<User?>(user); // No allocation
}
return new ValueTask<User?>(FetchUserAsync(id));
}
// DO: Task for real I/O (simpler, no footguns)
public Task<Order> CreateOrderAsync(CreateOrderCommand cmd)
{
// This always hits the database
return _repository.CreateAsync(cmd);
}
```
**ValueTask rules:**
- Never await a ValueTask more than once
- Never use `.Result` or `.GetAwaiter().GetResult()` before completion
- If in doubt, use Task
---
## Span and Memory for Bytes
Use `Span<T>` and `Memory<T>` instead of `byte[]` for low-level operations.
```csharp
// DO: Accept Span for synchronous operations
public static int ParseInt(ReadOnlySpan<char> text)
{
return int.Parse(text);
}
// DO: Accept Memory for async operations
public async Task WriteAsync(ReadOnlyMemory<byte> data)
{
await _stream.WriteAsync(data);
}
// DON'T: Force array allocation
public static int ParseInt(string text) // String allocated
{
return int.Parse(text);
}
```
### Common Span Patterns
```csharp
// Slice without allocation
ReadOnlySpan<char> span = "Hello, World!".AsSpan();
var hello = span[..5]; // No allocation
// Stack allocation for small buffers
Span<byte> buffer = stackalloc byte[256];
// Use ArrayPool for larger buffers
var buffer = ArrayPool<byte>.Shared.Rent(4096);
try
{
// Use buffer...
}
finally
{
ArrayPool<byte>.Shared.Return(buffer);
}
```
---
## Collection Return Types
### Return Immutable Collections from APIs
```csharp
// DO: Return immutable collection
public IReadOnlyList<Order> GetOrders()
{
return _orders.ToList(); // Caller can't modify internal state
}
// DO: Use frozen collections for static data (.NET 8+)
private static readonly FrozenDictionary<string, Handler> _handlers =
new Dictionary<string, Handler>
{
["create"] = new CreateHandler(),
["update"] = new UpdateHandler(),
}.ToFrozenDictionary();
// DON'T: Return mutable collection
public List<Order> GetOrders()
{
return _orders; // Caller can modify!
}
```
### Internal Mutation is Fine
```csharp
public IReadOnlyList<OrderItem> BuildOrderItems(Cart cart)
{
var items = new List<OrderItem>(); // Mutable internally
foreach (var cartItem in cart.Items)
{
items.Add(CreateOrderItem(cartItem));
}
return items; // Return as IReadOnlyList
}
```
### Collection Guidelines
| Scenario | Return Type |
|----------|-------------|
| API boundary | `IReadOnlyList<T>`, `IReadOnlyCollection<T>` |
| Static lookup data | `FrozenDictionary<K,V>`, `FrozenSet<T>` |
| Internal building | `List<T>`, then return as readonly |
| Single item or none | `T?` (nullable) |
| Zero or more, lazy | `IEnumerable<T>` |
---
## Quick Reference
| Pattern | Benefit |
|---------|---------|
| `sealed class` | Devirtualization, clear API |
| `readonly record struct` | No defensive copies, value semantics |
| Static pure functions | No vtable, testable, thread-safe |
| Defer `.ToList()` | Single materialization |
| `ValueTask` for hot paths | Avoid Task allocation |
| `Span<T>` for bytes | Stack allocation, no copying |
| `IReadOnlyList<T>` return | Immutable API contract |
| `FrozenDictionary` | Fastest lookup for static data |
---
## Anti-Patterns
```csharp
// DON'T: Unsealed class without reason
public class OrderService { } // Seal it!
// DON'T: Mutable struct
public struct Point { public int X; public int Y; } // Make readonly
// DON'T: Instance method that could be static
public int Add(int a, int b) => a + b; // Make static
// DON'T: Multiple ToList() calls
items.Where(...).ToList().OrderBy(...).ToList(); // One ToList at end
// DON'T: Return List<T> from public API
public List<Order> GetOrders(); // Return IReadOnlyList<T>
// DON'T: ValueTask for always-async operations
public ValueTask<Order> CreateOrderAsync(); // Just use Task
```
---
## Resources
- **Performance Best Practices**: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/performance/
- **Span<T> Guidance**: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/memory-and-spans/
- **Frozen Collections**: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.collections.frozen
© Aaronontheweb · MIT · Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills