prd-planner — Claude Code skill: PRDs and tech design in files
Runs PRD and technical design work through four files in docs/, so the agent keeps context across every step.
npx skills add zhaono1/agent-playbook --skill prd-planner -a claude-codeWhat prd-planner does
The skill fires when you explicitly say "PRD", "product requirements document" or "产品需求文档". It then creates four files under a shared kebab-case scope prefix: notes with requirements and architecture options, a task plan with phases, the PRD itself, and the technical design. Everything the agent learns and decides lands in those files instead of scrolling away in chat.
Work moves through phases: initialize, gather requirements, scan the codebase for edge cases, research practices, propose architecture options A/B/C, write the PRD, write the tech design, validate with you. Progress is tracked with checkboxes in the task plan, so you can see which step you are on.
It is not a general architecture tool. Ask for a "design solution" without mentioning a PRD and the skill points you to architecting-solutions instead. Its tool list is limited to Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob, AskUserQuestion and WebSearch.
What it helps with
- collect feature requirements into one document
- record architecture options with pros and cons
- break PRD creation into phases with progress marks
- keep product requirements separate from technical design
- pick a project back up and see where it stopped
Example prompts for the agent
- Create a PRD for PDF report export
- Write a product requirements document for the new notification system
- Do PRD planning for user onboarding
How to install prd-planner
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add zhaono1/agent-playbook --skill prd-planner -a claude-code2Manually: put the files in place
~/.claude/skills/prd-planner/SKILL.mdCopy the whole skill folder; for one project use .claude/skills/prd-planner/
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add zhaono1/agent-playbook --skill prd-planner -a codex2Manually: put the files in place
.agents/skills/prd-planner/SKILL.mdFor all projects use ~/.agents/skills/
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add zhaono1/agent-playbook --skill prd-planner -a cursor2Manually: put the files in place
.cursor/skills/prd-planner/SKILL.mdCursor also reads .agents/skills/ and .claude/skills/
1GitHub CLI
gh skill install zhaono1/agent-playbook prd-planner2Manually: put the files in place
.github/skills/prd-planner/SKILL.md1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add zhaono1/agent-playbook --skill prd-planner -a gemini-cli2Platform CLI
gemini skills install https://github.com/zhaono1/agent-playbook --path skills/prd-plannerManually: put the files in place
.devin/skills/prd-planner/SKILL.mdThe legacy .windsurf/skills/ path still works
Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add zhaono1/agent-playbook --skill prd-planner -a opencodeClaude.ai
Zip the folder and upload it in Settings → Capabilities → Skills
Step by step, with commands for each platform: How to install skills in Claude Code: five ways
Questions about prd-planner
How do I install prd-planner in Claude?
Run npx skills add zhaono1/agent-playbook --skill prd-planner -a claude-code. The skill then sits at ~/.claude/skills/prd-planner/SKILL.md.
What does prd-planner do?
It produces a PRD and a technical design while persisting every intermediate step into four files in docs/. That keeps the agent from losing gathered requirements to context switching.
How is prd-planner different from architecting-solutions?
prd-planner handles product requirements and tech design when your request mentions a PRD. Ask for solution design without that mention and it redirects you to architecting-solutions.
Source text
SKILL.md · MIT
---
name: prd-planner
description: Creates PRDs using persistent file-based planning. Use when user explicitly says "PRD", "product requirements document", or "产品需求文档". Combines PRD methodology with planning-with-files to avoid context switching.
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob, AskUserQuestion, WebSearch
metadata:
hooks:
after_complete:
- trigger: self-improving-agent
mode: background
reason: "Extract patterns and improve PRD quality"
- trigger: session-logger
mode: auto
reason: "Save session context"
---
# PRD Planner
A PRD creation skill that uses persistent file-based planning to maintain coherent thinking and avoid "left-brain vs right-brain" context switching issues.
## When This Skill Activates
This skill activates when you:
- Explicitly say "PRD", "prd", "create a PRD", or "产品需求文档"
- Say "product requirements document" or "产品需求"
- Mention "write a PRD for..."
- Say "PRD planning" or "PRD 设计"
**If user says "design solution" or "architecture design" without mentioning PRD, use `architecting-solutions` instead.**
## The Core Philosophy
> "PRD creation should be traceable, coherent, and persistent - not scattered across context switches."
This skill combines:
- **PRD methodology** (from architecting-solutions)
- **File-based persistence** (from planning-with-files)
To create a single, coherent PRD creation workflow that doesn't lose context.
## 4-File Pattern for PRD Creation
For every PRD project, create FOUR files:
Pick a SCOPE (short, unique, kebab-case slug) and use it as a prefix for all files.
```text
docs/{scope}-prd-notes.md → Store research, requirements, findings, options
docs/{scope}-prd-task-plan.md → Track PRD creation phases and progress
docs/{scope}-prd.md → Product requirements (what & why)
docs/{scope}-tech.md → Technical design (how)
```
### File Purposes
| File | Purpose | Audience | Updated When |
|------|---------|----------|--------------|
| `{scope}-prd-notes.md` | Raw research, requirements, architecture options (A/B/C) | Self + reviewers | New information gathered |
| `{scope}-prd-task-plan.md` | Track progress, phases, checkboxes, timestamps | PM + dev lead | Each phase completion |
| `{scope}-prd.md` | Product requirements (what & why), user flows | PM + stakeholders + devs | After requirements are clear |
| `{scope}-tech.md` | Technical design (API, data flow, implementation) | Developers + architects | After architecture is decided |
## Workflow
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PRD Creation Workflow │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ 1. Initialize → Create 4 files with template │
│ 2. Requirements → Gather to {scope}-prd-notes.md │
│ 2.5 Edge Cases → Scan codebase, infer patterns, ask smartly │
│ 3. Analysis → Research best practices, save to notes │
│ 4. Design → Propose architecture options (A/B/C), save to notes │
│ 5. PRD → Write product requirements to {scope}-prd.md │
│ 6. Tech → Write technical design to {scope}-tech.md │
│ 7. Validate → Review with user, finalize │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
All thinking persisted to files
↓
No context switching
```
## Step 1: Initialize
Create the four files with templates:
### {scope}-prd-task-plan.md
```markdown
# PRD Task Plan: {Feature Name}
## Goal
Create a PRD and technical design for {feature description}.
## Owner
{User name/role}
## Phases
- [x] Phase 1: Initialize files ✓
- [ ] Phase 2: Gather requirements (CURRENT)
- [ ] Phase 3: Research & analysis
- [ ] Phase 4: Design solution
- [ ] Phase 5: Write PRD
- [ ] Phase 6: Write technical design
- [ ] Phase 7: Validate & finalize
## Status
**Currently in Phase 2** - Gathering requirements from user
## Progress Log
- {timestamp} - Phase 1 complete: Files initialized
```
### {scope}-prd-notes.md
```markdown
# PRD Notes: {Feature Name}
## Raw Requirements
(Add user requirements as they emerge)
## Constraints
(Add technical, business, time constraints)
## Inferred Patterns (from codebase)
| Edge Case | Source | Pattern Applied |
|-----------|--------|-----------------|
| (Filled after Step 2.5 codebase scan) | | |
## Edge Cases
### Auto-handled (following codebase patterns)
- (Filled after Step 2.5 analysis)
### Confirmed by User
- (Filled after user confirms edge case decisions)
### Open Questions
- (Track questions to ask user)
## Research Findings
(Add research on best practices, similar solutions)
## Architecture Options
- Option A: {Description}
- Pros: {Advantages}
- Cons: {Disadvantages}
- Option B: {Description}
- Pros: {Advantages}
- Cons: {Disadvantages}
- Option C: {Description}
- Pros: {Advantages}
- Cons: {Disadvantages}
**Selected**: Option {X}
```
### {scope}-prd.md
```markdown
# PRD: {Feature Name}
> Status: DRAFT
> Last updated: {timestamp}
## Table of Contents
- [Problem Statement](#problem-statement)
- [Goals and Non-Goals](#goals-and-non-goals)
- [Success Criteria](#success-criteria)
- [Scope](#scope)
- [Requirements](#requirements)
- [User Flows](#user-flows)
- [Implementation Plan](#implementation-plan)
---
## Problem Statement
_To be filled after requirements gathering_
## Goals and Non-Goals
### Goals
- {Specific achievable outcomes}
### Non-Goals
- {Explicit exclusions}
## Success Criteria
_To be filled with measurable criteria_
## Scope
### In Scope
- {Specific items included}
### Out of Scope
- {Specific items excluded}
... (rest of PRD sections)
```
### {scope}-tech.md
```markdown
# Technical Design: {Feature Name}
> Status: DRAFT
> Last updated: {timestamp}
## Overview
{High-level technical approach}
## Key Components
{List major components and their responsibilities}
## API Design
{API signatures, request/response formats}
## Data Flow
{How data flows through the system}
## Implementation Details
{Specific implementation notes}
## Migration Plan
{If applicable, how to migrate from existing system}
```
## Step 2: Gather Requirements
Ask clarifying questions and save responses to `{scope}-prd-notes.md`:
### Core Questions to Ask
1. **Problem**: What problem are we solving?
2. **Users**: Who will use this?
3. **Success**: How do we know it's successful?
4. **Constraints**: Any technical/time/budget constraints?
Save each answer to `{scope}-prd-notes.md` under appropriate section.
**Always update `{scope}-prd-task-plan.md` after gathering info:**
```markdown
- [x] Phase 2: Gather requirements ✓
- [ ] Phase 2.5: Edge case analysis (CURRENT)
- [ ] Phase 3: Research & analysis
```
## Step 2.5: Context-Aware Edge Case Analysis
Before asking users about edge cases, **scan the codebase first** to infer existing patterns. This reduces redundant questions and ensures consistency with the project.
> **Detailed reference**: See `references/edge-case-analysis.md` for full scanning commands and output formats.
### Quick Process
1. **Scan codebase** for existing patterns (delete strategy, error handling, empty states, pagination)
2. **Identify requirement type** (CRUD, State Workflow, Async, Data Display, Form, File)
3. **Generate smart assumptions** - patterns found in code don't need user confirmation
4. **Ask only when needed** - no precedent, multiple patterns, or business decision required
### When to Ask Users
| Condition | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| Pattern exists in codebase | Auto-apply, no question needed |
| No precedent found | Ask user with options |
| Multiple conflicting patterns | Ask user to choose |
| Business rule required | Ask user |
### Output to Notes File
Update `{scope}-prd-notes.md` with:
```markdown
## Inferred Patterns (from codebase)
| Edge Case | Source | Pattern Applied |
|-----------|--------|-----------------|
| Delete | `src/models/User.ts:45` | Soft delete |
## Edge Cases
### Auto-handled (following codebase patterns)
- Empty list → Use existing EmptyState component
### Confirmed by User
- Concurrent edit: Last write wins (confirmed {date})
```
**Update task plan:**
```markdown
- [x] Phase 2.5: Edge case analysis ✓
- [ ] Phase 3: Research & analysis (CURRENT)
```
## Step 3: Research & Analysis
Research best practices and save to `{scope}-prd-notes.md`:
```bash
# Search for similar implementations
grep -r "keyword" packages/ --include="*.ts"
# Search web for best practices
web search "best practices for {feature}"
```
Save findings to `{scope}-prd-notes.md` → Research Findings section.
## Step 4: Design Solution
Propose architecture with trade-offs, save to `{scope}-prd-notes.md`:
```markdown
## Architecture Options
- Option A: {Description}
- Pros: {Advantages}
- Cons: {Disadvantages}
- Option B: {Description}
- Pros: {Advantages}
- Cons: {Disadvantages}
- Option C: {Description}
- Pros: {Advantages}
- Cons: {Disadvantages}
**Selected**: Option {X} - because {reason}
```
## Step 5: Write PRD
Read `{scope}-prd-notes.md` and synthesize into polished PRD:
```markdown
1. Read {scope}-prd-notes.md to understand:
- Requirements gathered
- Research findings
- Architecture decision (which option was selected)
2. Write {scope}-prd.md with:
- Clear problem statement
- Goals and Non-Goals (explicit exclusions)
- Measurable success criteria (specific numbers/timings)
- Scope (In Scope / Out of Scope)
- Functional requirements
- Non-functional requirements
- User flows
- Implementation plan (high level)
3. Reference tech doc: "See {scope}-tech.md for technical design"
```
## Step 6: Write Technical Design
```markdown
1. Read {scope}-prd-notes.md for selected architecture option
2. Write {scope}-tech.md with:
- Overview (technical approach summary)
- Key Components (what pieces, responsibilities)
- API Design (signatures, contracts)
- Data Flow (how data moves through system)
- Implementation Details (specific notes)
- Migration Plan (if applicable)
```
## Step 7: Validate & Finalize
Review with user:
1. Present PRD summary
2. Ask for feedback
3. Incorporate changes
4. Mark Phase 7 complete
## Important Rules
| Rule | Bad | Good |
|------|-----|------|
| Use Files | Keep in memory | Save to {scope}-prd-notes.md |
| Update Plan | Move on without update | Update task-plan.md with checkbox |
| Read Before Decide | Decide from memory | Read notes first |
| Separate Docs | Mix PRD + Tech | PRD for "what", Tech for "how" |
| Include Options | Jump to solution | Document 2-3 options with pros/cons |
## Phase Transitions
Update `{scope}-prd-task-plan.md` after each phase with checkbox ✓ and timestamp.
## Completing a PRD
Mark all phases complete, set status to "✅ COMPLETE", log final deliverables.
## File Cleanup (Optional)
After PRD is complete:
- Keep `{scope}-prd-notes.md` for reference (shows decision process)
- Archive `{scope}-prd-task-plan.md` or delete
- Final outputs are `{scope}-prd.md` and `{scope}-tech.md`
## Quick Start Template
```markdown
# PRD Task Plan: {Feature}
## Goal
Create PRD and technical design for {description}
## Phases
- [ ] Initialize 4 files
- [ ] Gather requirements
- [ ] Research & analysis
- [ ] Design solution (A/B/C options)
- [ ] Write PRD
- [ ] Write technical design
- [ ] Validate & finalize
## Status
Phase 1: Initializing files
```
## Why This Works
| Problem | Solution |
|---------|----------|
| Context switching | All thinking in files, read anytime |
| Lost requirements | Saved to {scope}-prd-notes.md immediately |
| Inconsistent PRDs | Same process, same structure |
| "Left brain vs right brain" | One coherent workflow |
| Re-explaining context | Files contain full context |
| Mixed concerns | PRD (product) separate from Tech (implementation) |
| Hidden decisions | Architecture options A/B/C documented |
## References
- [planning-with-files](../planning-with-files/) - File-based planning methodology
- [architecting-solutions](../architecting-solutions/) - Non-PRD solution and architecture design
- Edge case scanning: `references/edge-case-analysis.md`
---
## Auto-Trigger (Follow-up Metadata)
When this skill completes, record or run supported follow-ups:
1. **self-improving-agent** (background) - Propose reusable patterns
2. **session-logger** (auto) - Save session context when supported
© zhaono1 · MIT · zhaono1/agent-playbook