mcp-release-qa — GitHub Copilot skill for MCP server checks
Tests an MCP server in a live protocol session and compares its runtime capabilities with source and docs. Use it when reviewing a release or install path.
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill mcp-release-qaWhat mcp-release-qa does
The skill starts a fresh candidate server, runs initialization and discovery, then checks the results against source registrations, generated metadata, and documentation. It also probes protocol errors, invalid arguments, and the published installation process.
Its report records exact commands and responses, session results, mismatches, and missing evidence. For STDIO, it checks that stdout carries protocol messages and inspects stderr separately. Run mutation-capable tests with fixtures or in a sandbox, never against production data.
Use this skill when a release needs evidence that the MCP server and its published contract agree. It complements a security review; it does not replace one.
What it helps with
- compare registered tools and resources with runtime discovery
- exercise a complete MCP session from
initializethrough invocation - probe invalid arguments and protocol failure paths
- smoke-test the documented installation in a temporary destination
- record reproducible release evidence and contract mismatches
Example prompts for the agent
- Run release QA on this MCP server and record the exact commands and responses.
- Compare the live discovery results with source registrations and the README.
- Test the documented install command in a temporary destination.
How to install mcp-release-qa
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill mcp-release-qa2GitHub CLI
gh skill install github/awesome-copilot mcp-release-qa3Manually: put the files in place
.github/skills/mcp-release-qa/SKILL.md1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill mcp-release-qa -a claude-code2Manually: put the files in place
~/.claude/skills/mcp-release-qa/SKILL.mdCopy the whole skill folder; for one project use .claude/skills/mcp-release-qa/
Manually: put the files in place
.agents/skills/mcp-release-qa/SKILL.mdFor all projects use ~/.agents/skills/
Manually: put the files in place
.cursor/skills/mcp-release-qa/SKILL.mdCursor also reads .agents/skills/ and .claude/skills/
Platform CLI
gemini skills install https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --path skills/mcp-release-qaManually: put the files in place
.devin/skills/mcp-release-qa/SKILL.mdThe legacy .windsurf/skills/ path still works
Claude.ai
Zip the folder and upload it in Settings → Capabilities → Skills
From the same set554
The whole set →Similar
Questions about mcp-release-qa
How do I install mcp-release-qa in GitHub Copilot?
Run npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill mcp-release-qa. You can also use gh skill install github/awesome-copilot mcp-release-qa.
What does mcp-release-qa do?
It exercises an MCP server in a real protocol session, checks runtime capabilities against source and documentation, and records release evidence.
Why must initialization and discovery use the same session?
A new STDIO process starts a new session. The skill keeps initialize, notifications/initialized, discovery, and invocation together to test one valid session.
Source text
SKILL.md · MIT
--- name: mcp-release-qa description: 'Verify an MCP server before release by exercising a real protocol session, comparing runtime capabilities with source and documentation, testing failure paths, and recording reproducible evidence. Use when shipping or reviewing an MCP server, tool, resource, prompt, catalog, or install path.' --- # MCP Release QA Test the server that users will run. A schema review or a passing unit test is not runtime evidence. This skill complements security review. It focuses on protocol behavior, published-contract drift, transport correctness, and reproducible release evidence. ## Rules - Run checks against a fresh server process built from the candidate revision. - Keep `initialize`, `notifications/initialized`, discovery, and invocation in the same session. A new process is a new STDIO session. - Treat source registrations as implementation truth and public documentation as a contract that must match it. - Record exact commands and raw responses. Do not replace missing evidence with "looks correct." - Do not invoke mutation-capable tools against production data. Use fixtures, a sandbox, or stop and name the missing safe test environment. - Derive the expected capability inventory from the candidate source on every run. ## 1. Establish the release surface Identify: - candidate commit and build command; - server entry point and transport: STDIO, Streamable HTTP, or SSE; - supported MCP protocol versions; - source files that register tools, resources, resource templates, and prompts; - generated catalogs, manifests, README tables, and install instructions; - existing protocol, integration, and smoke-test commands. Prefer repository-native commands. Inspect `package.json`, `pyproject.toml`, `Makefile`, CI workflows, and contributor instructions before inventing a test harness. ## 2. Start a clean server Build the candidate and start the documented entry point with test-safe configuration. Capture: - the exact command; - commit SHA; - environment variable names, with values redacted; - stdout, stderr, and exit status; - the endpoint or child-process transport used by the client. For STDIO, stdout is protocol-only. Logs, banners, and stack traces belong on stderr. For HTTP transports, record the status, relevant MCP headers, and session identifier handling without printing credentials. If the server cannot start from its documented instructions, report that as a release failure and preserve the startup error verbatim. ## 3. Exercise one complete session Run this sequence through a real MCP client or the repository's integration harness: 1. `initialize` with a protocol version the server claims to support. 2. Confirm the negotiated version and advertised capabilities. 3. Send `notifications/initialized`. 4. Call `ping`. 5. Call each supported discovery method: - `tools/list` - `resources/list` - `resources/templates/list` - `prompts/list` 6. Exercise at least one representative read-only item from every advertised capability class. 7. Follow pagination until no cursor remains when a list method is paginated. Do not send post-initialization requests through separate one-shot processes. That accidentally tests several incomplete sessions instead of one valid session. ## 4. Prove inventory parity Build four inventories from current evidence: | Surface | Evidence | |---|---| | Source | Registered tool, resource, template, and prompt definitions | | Runtime | Results from the live discovery methods | | Generated metadata | Catalogs, manifests, or generated indexes | | Documentation | README, reference pages, and install output | Compare by stable identifier. Report: - source entries missing at runtime; - runtime entries absent from metadata or documentation; - stale names, descriptions, arguments, URIs, or prompt parameters; - documented install commands that do not start the candidate server. Regenerate derived files with the repository's own build command, then fail if the working tree still contains unexplained generated changes. ## 5. Check published contracts For every discovered item, verify the runtime definition against its source: ### Tools - Name and description are stable and specific. - `inputSchema` defines types, required fields, enums, and bounds where needed. - Unknown properties are rejected when the tool contract is closed. - Mutation, idempotence, read-only, and open-world annotations match behavior. - Successful calls conform to `outputSchema` when one is published. - Errors are protocol errors or structured tool failures, not leaked stack traces. ### Resources and templates - URIs and MIME types match the registered definitions. - Static resources are readable. - Template parameters are validated before resolution. - Missing or forbidden resources fail explicitly. ### Prompts - Required and optional arguments match discovery output. - `prompts/get` returns usable messages for valid arguments. - Missing required arguments and unknown prompt names fail explicitly. ## 6. Test failure paths At minimum, probe: - a request before initialization completes; - malformed JSON or an invalid JSON-RPC envelope; - an unknown method; - an unsupported protocol version; - repeated initialization; - unknown tool, resource, and prompt names; - missing, extra, wrong-type, and out-of-bounds arguments; - a request at the documented transport-size limit and one beyond it; - a controlled internal failure with credentials and stack traces redacted. Verify that each response has the correct request ID, a useful error message, and no successful side effect. For STDIO, also confirm every stdout line is a complete protocol message and a healthy session leaves stderr clean unless the server explicitly documents diagnostic output. ## 7. Smoke-test installation When the project publishes an install command: 1. Create a temporary destination outside the source checkout. 2. Run the public install command exactly as documented. 3. Start the installed artifact without relying on files from the source tree. 4. Repeat initialization, discovery, and one read-only invocation. 5. Remove the temporary destination after preserving the command output. An install string that was only inspected is unverified. ## 8. Report the evidence Use this format: ```markdown # MCP Release QA Candidate: [commit] Transport: [STDIO | Streamable HTTP | SSE] Verdict: PASS | PASS WITH CAVEATS | FAIL ## Commands and results - `[exact command]` — [exit status and result] ## Session transcript - initialize: [result] - discovery: [result] - representative calls: [result] - negative paths: [result] ## Parity | Identifier | Source | Runtime | Metadata | Docs | Result | |---|---|---|---|---|---| ## Findings | Severity | Evidence | Impact | Narrowest fix | |---|---|---|---| ## Missing evidence - [check that could not run and why] ``` Use `FAIL` for a server that cannot start, complete a valid session, keep the transport parseable, or safely reject invalid input. Use `PASS WITH CAVEATS` only for bounded documentation or metadata drift that does not misrepresent a dangerous capability. Otherwise use `PASS`.
© github · MIT · github/awesome-copilot