Lead Qualification — Claude Code skill: what it does, how to install
Evaluates and scores sales leads using BANT, MEDDIC, and GPCTBA/C&I frameworks. It helps teams prioritize prospect pipelines and spot deal-breakers early.
npx skills add claude-office-skills/skills --skill lead-qualification -a claude-codeWhat Lead Qualification does
The skill structures lead qualification around three sales frameworks: BANT, MEDDIC, and GPCTBA/C&I. Scoring splits into two separate hundred-point metrics: demographic Fit Score and behavioral Engagement Score. Fit scoring measures account attributes like industry, company size, and revenue, alongside the contact's title and seniority level.
The resulting report categorizes prospects into qualified, needing nurturing, or disqualified. The model highlights positive indicators, flags missing details, and runs disqualification checks against hard deal-breakers such as lack of budget authority or vendor lock-in.
Processing spreadsheets directly requires the office-mcp MCP server with its read_xlsx and create_xlsx tools. Without this integration, the agent cannot parse lead tables automatically. The skill targets claude-sonnet-4 and claude-opus-4 models, with declared language support for English and Chinese.
What it helps with
- Score prospects using BANT criteria
- Evaluate enterprise deals against the MEDDIC framework
- Calculate demographic fit scores for target accounts and contacts
- Identify deal-breakers and disqualification triggers
Example prompts for the agent
- Qualify this inbound lead using the BANT framework and calculate the score
- Run a MEDDIC evaluation on this deal and list all identified gaps
- Score this prospect company and contact according to our Fit Score criteria
How to install Lead Qualification
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add claude-office-skills/skills --skill lead-qualification -a claude-code2Manually: put the files in place
~/.claude/skills/lead-qualification/SKILL.mdCopy the whole skill folder; for one project use .claude/skills/lead-qualification/
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add claude-office-skills/skills --skill lead-qualification -a codex2Manually: put the files in place
.agents/skills/lead-qualification/SKILL.mdFor all projects use ~/.agents/skills/
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add claude-office-skills/skills --skill lead-qualification -a cursor2Manually: put the files in place
.cursor/skills/lead-qualification/SKILL.mdCursor also reads .agents/skills/ and .claude/skills/
1GitHub CLI
gh skill install claude-office-skills/skills lead-qualification2Manually: put the files in place
.github/skills/lead-qualification/SKILL.md1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add claude-office-skills/skills --skill lead-qualification -a gemini-cli2Platform CLI
gemini skills install https://github.com/claude-office-skills/skills --path lead-qualificationManually: put the files in place
.devin/skills/lead-qualification/SKILL.mdThe legacy .windsurf/skills/ path still works
Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add claude-office-skills/skills --skill lead-qualification -a opencodeClaude.ai
Zip the folder and upload it in Settings → Capabilities → Skills
Step by step, with commands for each platform: How to install skills in Claude Code: five ways
Questions about Lead Qualification
How do I install Lead Qualification in Claude Code?
Run npx skills add claude-office-skills/skills --skill lead-qualification -a claude-code. The skill file will be saved to ~/.claude/skills/lead-qualification/SKILL.md.
Which qualification frameworks does this skill support?
It includes templates for BANT, MEDDIC, and GPCTBA/C&I. These structures cover budget, decision criteria, economic buyers, pain points, and purchase timelines.
Does this skill require an MCP server?
Text-based prompts work independently, but spreadsheet workflows require office-mcp. That server supplies the read_xlsx, analyze_spreadsheet, and create_xlsx tools needed to parse files.
Source text
SKILL.md · MIT
---
# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# CLAUDE OFFICE SKILL - Enhanced Metadata v2.0
# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# Basic Information
name: Lead Qualification
description: "Score and qualify leads based on criteria and fit"
version: "1.0"
author: claude-office-skills
license: MIT
# Categorization
category: sales
tags:
- lead
- qualification
- scoring
- sales
department: Sales
# AI Model Compatibility
models:
recommended:
- claude-sonnet-4
- claude-opus-4
compatible:
- claude-3-5-sonnet
- gpt-4
- gpt-4o
# MCP Tools Integration
mcp:
server: office-mcp
tools:
- read_xlsx
- analyze_spreadsheet
- create_xlsx
# Skill Capabilities
capabilities:
- lead_scoring
- qualification_criteria
- prioritization
# Language Support
languages:
- en
- zh
---
# Lead Qualification
Score and qualify leads based on defined criteria to focus sales efforts effectively.
## Overview
This skill helps you:
- Evaluate leads against qualification criteria
- Score leads for prioritization
- Identify deal-breakers and green flags
- Recommend next actions
- Maintain consistent qualification
## Qualification Frameworks
### BANT (Budget, Authority, Need, Timeline)
```markdown
## BANT Qualification: [Lead Name]
### Budget (/25)
| Question | Answer | Score |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Defined budget? | [Yes/No/Unknown] | /10 |
| Budget range? | [$X - $Y] | /10 |
| Budget fits our pricing? | [Yes/No] | /5 |
**Budget Score**: [X]/25
### Authority (/25)
| Question | Answer | Score |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Decision maker? | [Yes/No/Influencer] | /10 |
| Who else involved? | [Names/Roles] | /5 |
| Sign-off process? | [Description] | /5 |
| Champion identified? | [Yes/No] | /5 |
**Authority Score**: [X]/25
### Need (/25)
| Question | Answer | Score |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Clear pain point? | [Description] | /10 |
| Impact of not solving? | [Description] | /10 |
| Using alternatives? | [Current solution] | /5 |
**Need Score**: [X]/25
### Timeline (/25)
| Question | Answer | Score |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Target implementation? | [Date/Quarter] | /10 |
| Urgency level? | [High/Medium/Low] | /10 |
| Trigger event? | [Description] | /5 |
**Timeline Score**: [X]/25
---
**Total BANT Score**: [X]/100
**Qualification**: [Qualified / Needs Work / Not Qualified]
```
### MEDDIC (Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, Decision Process, Identify Pain, Champion)
```markdown
## MEDDIC Qualification: [Lead Name]
### Metrics
**Business impact they expect**:
- [Metric 1]: [Current] → [Target]
- [Metric 2]: [Current] → [Target]
### Economic Buyer
**Person with budget authority**:
- Name: [Name]
- Title: [Title]
- Access: [Direct/Indirect/None]
### Decision Criteria
**How they'll evaluate solutions**:
1. [Criterion 1] - Weight: [%]
2. [Criterion 2] - Weight: [%]
3. [Criterion 3] - Weight: [%]
### Decision Process
**Steps to purchase**:
1. [Step 1] - Owner: [Name] - Timeline: [Date]
2. [Step 2] - Owner: [Name] - Timeline: [Date]
3. [Step 3] - Owner: [Name] - Timeline: [Date]
### Identify Pain
**Core problem**:
[Description of the pain point]
**Implications of not solving**:
[Business impact]
### Champion
**Internal advocate**:
- Name: [Name]
- Influence level: [High/Medium/Low]
- What they gain: [Personal win]
---
**MEDDIC Coverage**: [X]/6 elements confirmed
**Deal Health**: [Strong / At Risk / Weak]
```
### GPCTBA/C&I (Goals, Plans, Challenges, Timeline, Budget, Authority, Consequences & Implications)
```markdown
## GPCTBA/C&I: [Lead Name]
### Goals
What are they trying to achieve?
- [Goal 1]
- [Goal 2]
### Plans
How do they plan to achieve it?
- [Current plan]
### Challenges
What's stopping them?
- [Challenge 1]
- [Challenge 2]
### Timeline
When do they need to achieve this?
- Target: [Date]
- Urgency: [High/Medium/Low]
### Budget
What resources are allocated?
- Amount: [Range]
- Approved: [Yes/No/Pending]
### Authority
Who makes the decision?
- Decision Maker: [Name]
- Influencers: [Names]
- Process: [Description]
### Consequences (Negative)
What happens if they don't solve this?
- [Consequence 1]
- [Consequence 2]
### Implications (Positive)
What happens when they succeed?
- [Benefit 1]
- [Benefit 2]
```
## Lead Scoring Model
### Fit Score (Demographics)
```markdown
## Fit Scoring Criteria
### Company Fit (50 points)
| Criterion | Points | Lead Value | Score |
|-----------|--------|------------|-------|
| Industry | /15 | [Industry] | |
| Company Size | /15 | [Employees] | |
| Revenue | /10 | [Revenue] | |
| Geography | /10 | [Location] | |
**Company Fit**: [X]/50
### Contact Fit (50 points)
| Criterion | Points | Lead Value | Score |
|-----------|--------|------------|-------|
| Title/Role | /20 | [Title] | |
| Department | /15 | [Dept] | |
| Seniority | /15 | [Level] | |
**Contact Fit**: [X]/50
**Total Fit Score**: [X]/100
```
### Engagement Score (Behavioral)
```markdown
## Engagement Scoring
### Website Activity
| Action | Points | Occurrences | Score |
|--------|--------|-------------|-------|
| Pricing page view | 10 | [X] | |
| Demo request | 25 | [X] | |
| Content download | 5 | [X] | |
| Blog visit | 2 | [X] | |
### Email Engagement
| Action | Points | Occurrences | Score |
|--------|--------|-------------|-------|
| Email opened | 1 | [X] | |
| Link clicked | 3 | [X] | |
| Replied | 10 | [X] | |
### Event Participation
| Action | Points | Occurrences | Score |
|--------|--------|-------------|-------|
| Webinar attended | 15 | [X] | |
| Meeting booked | 25 | [X] | |
**Total Engagement Score**: [X]/100
```
## Output Format
### Lead Qualification Report
```markdown
# Lead Qualification: [Company/Contact]
## Summary
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| **Fit Score** | [X]/100 |
| **Engagement Score** | [X]/100 |
| **BANT Score** | [X]/100 |
| **Overall** | [X]/100 |
## Qualification Status
🟢 **QUALIFIED** / 🟡 **NEEDS NURTURING** / 🔴 **NOT QUALIFIED**
## Key Findings
### ✅ Green Flags
1. [Positive indicator]
2. [Positive indicator]
### ⚠️ Yellow Flags
1. [Concern that needs addressing]
2. [Missing information]
### ❌ Red Flags
1. [Deal-breaker or major concern]
## Gaps to Address
| Gap | Question to Ask | Priority |
|-----|-----------------|----------|
| [Unknown area] | [Specific question] | High |
| [Unknown area] | [Specific question] | Medium |
## Recommended Next Steps
1. [Immediate action]
2. [Follow-up action]
3. [Long-term action]
## Disqualification Criteria Check
- [ ] Below minimum company size
- [ ] Outside target geography
- [ ] No budget authority
- [ ] Timeline > 12 months
- [ ] Already using competitor with lock-in
```
## Best Practices
### Qualification Tips
1. **Ask open-ended questions**: Get context, not just yes/no
2. **Verify, don't assume**: Confirm information directly
3. **Document everything**: Keep CRM updated
4. **Re-qualify regularly**: Situations change
5. **Know when to walk away**: Time is valuable
### Common Mistakes
- Qualifying too quickly
- Ignoring red flags
- Not identifying all stakeholders
- Assuming budget = ability to buy
- Forgetting to re-qualify over time
## Limitations
- Cannot access CRM data directly
- Scoring requires defined criteria from user
- Cannot verify provided information
- Qualification is guidance, not guarantee
- Human judgment still essential
© claude-office-skills · MIT · claude-office-skills/skills