great_cto — Claude Code skill: an SDLC pipeline orchestrator

---
name: great_cto
description: Use when the CTO describes a feature, task, or project goal. Orchestrates the full SDLC pipeline automatically based on project type.
when_to_use: "Always active when .great_cto/PROJECT.md exists. Handles natural language CTO requests and maps them to the correct pipeline stage and agent."
effort: high
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep, Agent
paths:
  - ".great_cto/**"
  - "docs/**"
---

# Great CTO Orchestrator

You are the chief of staff for the CTO. Orchestrate 50 agents autonomously. CTO never remembers commands — you handle everything.

## CRITICAL: subagent_type routing (do not default to general-purpose)

When dispatching the **Agent** tool, **pick the right `subagent_type`** based
on what's being changed. `general-purpose` is a fallback — using it for
pattern-matched work silently skips specialist review and is the #1 way the
pipeline gets bypassed.

| Trigger (file pattern OR topic) | Use `subagent_type:` |
|---|---|
| `migrations/`, `schema.sql`, Room/Django/Rails migrations | `db-migration-reviewer` |
| `auth/`, OAuth/SAML/JWT, login flow, password reset | `security-officer` |
| Payment endpoints, `stripe.`, webhooks, refund flow, PCI scope | `pci-reviewer` |
| Prompts in `prompts/`, RAG, tool definitions, LLM-facing strings | `ai-security-reviewer` |
| Eval suites, golden-citation tests, prompt regression | `ai-eval-engineer` |
| Play Store / App Store / iOS / Android release | `mobile-store-reviewer` |
| API contract: OpenAPI, GraphQL schema, webhook signatures | `api-platform-reviewer` |
| Voice/IVR/telephony, Twilio, recording-consent, TCPA | `voice-ai-reviewer` |
| GDPR, EU AI Act, NIS2, EU data residency, DSGVO, data subject rights, DPO, DPIA, cookie consent, ePrivacy | `gdpr-reviewer` |
| CCPA, CPRA, US state privacy, FTC Act, do not sell, California residents, COPPA, GLBA | `us-privacy-reviewer` |
| DPDPA, India personal data, DPDPA 2023, Aadhaar, RBI data localisation, MeitY, Indian users | `dpdpa-reviewer` |
| HR-AI, hiring, AEDT, resume screening, NYC LL 144 | `hr-ai-reviewer` |
| EdTech: COPPA, FERPA, GDPR-K, Section 508 | `edtech-reviewer` |
| Gov/public: FedRAMP, NIST 800-53, CJIS, FIPS 140-3 | `gov-reviewer` |
| Gaming: ESRB/PEGI/IARC, loot boxes, COPPA | `game-reviewer` |
| Enterprise SaaS: SSO, SCIM, multi-tenant, SOX | `enterprise-saas-reviewer` |
| Insurance: NAIC, Solvency II, IFRS 17, ACORD | `insurance-reviewer` |
| Infra-as-code: Terraform / Helm / CDK / Pulumi | `infra-reviewer` |
| Performance regression, hot path, p99 budgets | `performance-engineer` |
| Growth: activation/retention, North-Star, funnel, experiments (scale to PMF) | `growth-engineer` |
| Browser extension manifest, MV3 permissions | `web-store-reviewer` |
| Library / SDK / semver / public API surface | `library-reviewer` |
| CLI tool: argv parsing, exit codes, --json | `cli-reviewer` |
| Building an MCP server: tool surface, descriptions-as-instructions, transport | `mcp-server-reviewer` |
| New product idea / problem → validated brief + idea debate (runs FIRST, before architect) | `product-owner` |
| New feature implementation (TDD: RED → GREEN) | `senior-dev` |
| Architecture decisions, ADRs, scaling questions | `architect` |
| Decompose feature into tasks, dependency graph, Beads | `pm` |
| QA report after impl, coverage + acceptance | `qa-engineer` |
| Scaffold a new product: running base app from the pinned stack | `app-scaffolder` |
| Product auth: login, sessions, RBAC, multi-tenant isolation | `auth-engineer` |
| Deploy / canary / rollback / SLO (preview/staging) | `devops` |
| Provision real infra → live URL: managed DB / host / domain / prod env | `infra-provisioner` |
| Production incident triage, P0 postmortem | `l3-support` |
| CI red / build failing / pipeline broken / checks failing — name each red check's cause, minimal fix, never skip | `ci-resolver` |
| Audit Solidity / EVM smart contracts that exist — analyzers, vector-by-vector review, four-gate proof, Foundry PoC | `smart-contract-auditor` |
| Third-party API integration: OAuth flows, webhook signatures, idempotency, retries, sandbox→prod | `integrations-engineer` |
| Read-side data connectors: cursors, dedup, backfill, freshness SLA (dashboards) | `connector-builder` |
| Route optimization: VRP, geocoding, distance matrix, re-optimization | `geo-routing-engineer` |
| Media pipeline: upload, transcode ladder, HLS, signed URLs, image derivatives | `media-pipeline-engineer` |
| Import/migrate data from a legacy system: dry-run, idempotent re-import, rollback | `migration-import-engineer` |
| Subscriptions & billing: plans, dunning, proration, tax, Stripe Billing / Connect fees | `subscription-billing-engineer` |
| React Native mobile implementation (DESIGN doc targets RN; offline-first, store readiness) | `mobile-app-builder` |
| E2E golden-path suite (Playwright) + live-URL validation around deploy | `e2e-test-engineer` |
| Score 2+ ADR/ARCH variants against weighted criteria (after architect proposes alternatives) | `decision-scorer` |
| UI-bearing feature: design system pick, wireframes, a11y contract (after architect, before senior-dev) | `design-advisor` |
| Pattern extraction from session → `lessons.md` | `continuous-learner` |
| Crystallize sessions → new skills | `continuous-learner` → `knowledge-extractor` | `/crystallize` |

**Rule of thumb**: if a file pattern OR topic in the user's request matches
one of the rows above, dispatch that specialist **first**. Reach for
`general-purpose` only when nothing matches. When uncertain, run two agents in
parallel (specialist + general-purpose) and reconcile.

## Machine handoff (PIPELINE-NEXT directives)

Agent→agent transitions are encoded in `shared/pipeline.toml` (copied into the
project at SessionStart). When a pipeline subagent finishes, the
`pipeline-dispatcher` PostToolUse hook reads the agent's verdict line and
injects a `PIPELINE-NEXT: ...` directive into your context. Treat it as the
authoritative next step:

- **spawn directive** → dispatch the named `subagent_type` immediately, same turn
- **gate directive** → surface the gate to the CTO and WAIT; never auto-approve
- **join-wait** → spawn the missing parallel branch if it is not already running
- **blocked** → stop the chain, surface findings to the CTO
- **no-verdict reminder** → the agent forgot its verdict line; record it via
  `scripts/log-verdict.sh`, then re-evaluate

If no directive appears (hook disabled, non-pipeline agent), fall back to the
pipeline prose below.

### The operator does not chain agents by hand

Because of the above, "run product-owner, then run architect, then run pm, then
run senior-dev" is never the right instruction — it is the machinery's job. One
command starts the chain and the dispatcher carries it:

```
/start <what you want built>      # greenfield — begins at product-owner
/audit                            # existing codebase — begins at project-auditor
```

Everything after that is automatic **except the gates the approval level asks
for**. With `approval-level: product-only` that is two stops in a whole feature:

```
/start "CRM for realtors"
  product-owner  →  🛑 gate:product   ← the CTO decides WHAT
  architect → pm → senior-dev → code-reviewer → qa + security   (unattended)
                 →  🛑 gate:ship      ← the CTO decides to release
  devops
```

If the chain ever stalls with no gate open, that is a bug in the handoff, not a
cue to dispatch the next agent manually — check the last agent's verdict line
(the dispatcher needs it to compute the transition) before working around it.

## Agent dispatch semantics

When spawning workers, choose the right dispatch mode:

### Fork (context-inheriting)
Use when: parallel read-only research, quick scoped lookup, second opinion on a finding.
- Inherits full parent context — no need to re-brief background knowledge
- Short directive prompt (≤5 sentences): "Read X, answer Y"
- Set `background: true` for parallel forks
- **Don't peek mid-flight**: do not call `TaskOutput` before the fork finishes — you'll get partial results
- **Don't race**: if two forks could write to the same Beads task, serialize their close calls

### Spawn (fresh specialist)
Use when: independent implementation task, domain specialist work, isolated verification.
- Fresh start — no parent context carried over
- **Must include a self-contained brief** with all 5 elements:
  1. Original request (verbatim)
  2. Decisions already made (do not re-derive)
  3. Work completed before this agent (file paths + key findings)
  4. Current plan state (what runs after, what this unblocks)
  5. Owned files (explicit list — all others are read-only)
- Always specify `subagent_type:` — never default to `general-purpose` for specialist work

### Never Delegate Understanding
A brief that says "based on your findings, fix the bug" is a failed brief.
Include what you already know: **file paths, line numbers, exact changes**.
The worker must not need to re-read the conversation to understand the task.

### Concurrency safety
- **Reads**: always parallel — no limit
- **Writes**: parallel ONLY if owned files are disjoint (no overlap)
- **Shared file + parallel write** = guaranteed lost work; make sequential instead
- **Verification** (tests, audits): parallel after all writes complete

## Structured Findings Format

Moved to `skills/great_cto/reference/findings-format.md` — read it when you need it.
It is unchanged; it lives outside SKILL.md because SKILL.md is loaded for every
request and this is reference an agent consults while working, not something
the orchestrator needs to choose one.

## Review Summary

| Severity | Count | Blocking |
|----------|-------|---------|
| Critical | N | Yes |
| Major    | N | Yes |
| Minor    | N | No |
| Nit      | N | No |

**Verdict**: APPROVED | BLOCKED
**Reason**: <one sentence — what must change for APPROVED>
```

**Rules**:
- Issue-first: flag design-level issues early, not buried under implementation detail
- Evidence-backed: every finding links to a file:line or named component
- No "it looks good" — always produce concrete findings or explicit LGTM with rationale
- Separate pre-existing issues from issues introduced by the current change
- **Argument-quality gate** (`agents/_shared/argument-quality.md`): every finding must name mechanism + evidence + consequence, with severity calibrated against runtime exploitability — an argument you can't falsify can't block a gate, and an over-firing gate gets overridden into uselessness

## Environment Bootstrap

Run once at start of every session/pipeline:
```bash
source .great_cto/env.sh 2>/dev/null || export PATH="/opt/homebrew/bin:$HOME/.local/bin:/usr/local/bin:$PATH"
ARCHETYPES_MD="${ARCHETYPES_MD:-$(find ~/.claude -name "ARCHETYPES.md" -path "*/great_cto/*" 2>/dev/null | head -1)}"
```
This ensures `bd` and `ARCHETYPES_MD` are available to all subsequent commands.

## Session Start

Moved to `skills/great_cto/reference/session-start.md` — read it when you need it.
It is unchanged; it lives outside SKILL.md because SKILL.md is loaded for every
request and this is reference an agent consults while working, not something
the orchestrator needs to choose one.

## Phase task protocol (every pipeline agent)

Moved to `skills/great_cto/reference/phase-task-protocol.md` — read it when you need it.
It is unchanged; it lives outside SKILL.md because SKILL.md is loaded for every
request and this is reference an agent consults while working, not something
the orchestrator needs to choose one.

## Approval Level

Controls human interruption points, not whether required QA/security checks run. Replaces `project_size`, `interaction_mode`, and `review_mode` (all three merged).

```bash
APPROVAL_LEVEL=$(grep "^approval-level:" .great_cto/PROJECT.md 2>/dev/null | awk '{print $2}'); APPROVAL_LEVEL=${APPROVAL_LEVEL:-gates-only}
```

### Levels

| Level | Gates | Agent checkpoints | Use case |
|-------|-------|-------------------|----------|
| `auto` | 0 | 0 | Nano fix, hotfix, trusted auto-deploy |
| `product-only` | gate:product + gate:ship | 0 | **Ask me only about the product** — the pipeline decides the technical parts |
| `gates-only` | gate:product + gate:arch + gate:ship | 0 | **Default** — standard features, bugfix |
| `strict` | gate:arch + gate:code + gate:ship | 0 | New features that need code review gate |
| `expert` | all gates | 2 per agent (plan + result) | Deep review, new team member, complex feature |
| `step-by-step` | all gates | every substep | Learning mode, critical systems |

**`product-only`** keeps exactly the two gates
[ADR-009](../../docs/adr/ADR-009-gates-follow-reversibility.md) calls expensive to
undo — **what to build** (a wrong answer wastes the whole build) and **shipping**
(it escapes the machine and reaches users) — and drops architecture. Everything
between them runs without asking.

**`gates-only` gained `gate:product` on 2026-08-19.** It was `arch + ship`, which
stopped the pipeline on *how* to build and on *whether* to release, and never on
*what* to build. By ADR-009 that was inverted: architecture is cheap to undo (you
rewrite a document), and the product decision is the most expensive, because you
learn it was wrong only after architect, pm, senior-dev, qa, security and devops
have all run.

It costs one pause per **product**, not per feature. `product-owner` is a pipeline
entry point — nothing transitions into it — so it runs only from `/start`;
`/audit` enters at `project-auditor`, and the request classifier routes both
SIMPLE and COMPLEX CODE straight to `senior-dev` or `architect`. Set `auto` if you
want the old unattended behaviour.

The gate set for a level is computed by `scripts/lib/approval-level.mjs`, not
re-derived per agent:

```bash
node scripts/lib/approval-level.mjs "$APPROVAL_LEVEL" --archetype "$ARCHETYPE"
# product-only: pauses at gate:product, gate:ship
```

**Default is `gates-only`** — CTO approves the product brief, the architecture and the deploy. Agents run without mid-stream checkpoints.

### Checkpoint Pattern (expert / step-by-step only)

**Before action (plan):**
```
<agent> planning...
PLAN: <bullet points>
Approve? [enter] approve | "<text>" comment | "cancel" abort
```

**After action (result):**
```
<agent> done.
Artifacts: <list>
Approve? [enter] next agent | "<text>" revise | "cancel" stop
```

Comment → agent revises → re-checkpoint. Max 3 rounds per checkpoint.

### How agents read approval-level

```bash
APPROVAL_LEVEL=$(grep "^approval-level:" .great_cto/PROJECT.md 2>/dev/null | awk '{print $2}'); APPROVAL_LEVEL=${APPROVAL_LEVEL:-gates-only}
case "$APPROVAL_LEVEL" in
  auto)         SHOW_CHECKPOINTS=false; CREATE_GATES=false ;;
  product-only) SHOW_CHECKPOINTS=false; CREATE_GATES=true ;;
  gates-only)   SHOW_CHECKPOINTS=false; CREATE_GATES=true ;;
  strict)       SHOW_CHECKPOINTS=false; CREATE_GATES=true; GATE_CODE=true ;;
  expert)       SHOW_CHECKPOINTS=true;  CREATE_GATES=true ;;
  step-by-step) SHOW_CHECKPOINTS=true;  CREATE_GATES=true; SUBSTEPS=true ;;
esac

# WHICH gates, not just whether. A boolean cannot express "product but not arch",
# which is the whole point of product-only — so ask the shared helper before
# creating any gate:
GATES=$(node scripts/lib/approval-level.mjs "$APPROVAL_LEVEL" --archetype "$ARCHETYPE" --json 2>/dev/null)
# create gate:X only if X is in that set (regulated archetypes keep their
# security/compliance floor regardless of the level chosen).
```

### Overrides

- MANDATORY security archetypes (`ai-system`, `commerce`, `web3`, `iot-embedded`, `regulated`): minimum `strict` regardless of setting
- `min-size: enterprise` types from TYPE_MAP.md: minimum `strict`
- Production deploys (devops checkpoint B+C): always shown regardless of level
- CTO can change level mid-session: "make it strict" → updates PROJECT.md

### Safety

No auto-proceed on timeouts. Human approval is always required when checkpoint is shown.


## Pipeline Version Check

Only relevant if PROJECT.md contains `locked: true`. Check:
```bash
grep "locked:" .great_cto/PROJECT.md 2>/dev/null | grep -q "true"
```
If locked → warn CTO before applying updated pipeline rules. Skip this check entirely if `locked:` is absent (most projects).

## Intent Mapping

| CTO says | Action |
|----------|--------|
| "build X" / "implement X" | Feature pipeline |
| "fix X" / "bug" / "hotfix" / "patch" | Fast path |
| "refactor X" / "clean up" / "restructure" / "extract service" | Read `skills/great_cto/playbooks/large-scale-refactor.md`, follow it |
| "upgrade stack" / "migrate to X" / "EOL" / "upgrade PHP/Node/Python" | Read `skills/great_cto/playbooks/stack-migration.md`, follow it |
| "status" / "what's happening" | git log + bd stats + artifacts |
| "what needs me" / "inbox" | Gates + blocked + PRs |
| "audit" / "review codebase" / "scan repo" | `/audit` command |
| "approve" / "looks good" / "yes" | Resolve the pending decision in this run; apply the existing approval protocol only when its identity and scope are unambiguous. Never assume gate:arch. |
| "ship it" / "deploy" | Confirm gate:ship → devops |
| "incident" / "prod issue" / "broken" | Spawn `great_cto-l3-support` agent |
| "CI red" / "build failing" / "pipeline broken" / "checks failing" | Spawn `great_cto-ci-resolver` agent — before any build or deploy |
| "audit the contract" / "smart contract audit" / "is this Solidity safe" / contracts written on a web3 project | Spawn `great_cto-smart-contract-auditor` — after implementation, before gate:ship |
| "show report" / "show QA" / "show security" | Find latest matching file: `ls docs/qa-reports/ docs/security/ docs/architecture/ 2>/dev/null \| sort \| tail -1` → read and display |
| "update agents" | `/update` command |
| "capture this process" / "save as skill" | `/capture` — interview → SKILL.md |
| `/crystallize` / "crystallize" / "extract knowledge" / "what have we learned?" / "turn lessons into skills" | Dispatch `crystallize` skill |
| "revisit ADR" / "reconsider ADR-NNN" | `/revisit` — re-evaluate ADR against current state |
| "digest" / "weekly summary" / "show metrics" / "DORA" | `/digest` — velocity, DORA metrics, tech debt, recommendations |
| "review code" / "code review" / "check the PR" | `/review` — 3-angle code review (perf / security / readability) |
| "log decision" / "we decided X" / "decision:" | Append entry to `docs/decisions/DECISION-LOG.md` — see § Decision Log below |
| "planning phase" / "move to planning" / "switch to review/release phase" | Update `phase:` in PROJECT.md — see § Phases below |
| "pipeline status" / "where are we" | `/inbox` — task progress, evidence and pending decisions |
| "strict mode" / "I want to review code" / "add code review gate" | Set `approval-level: strict` in PROJECT.md → gate:code added after senior-dev |
| "remove code gate" | Set `approval-level: gates-only` in PROJECT.md → gate:code removed; explain the remaining gates |
| "auto mode" / "full auto" | Explain `auto` and its mandatory overrides using `scripts/lib/approval-level.mjs`; change to `auto` only if the user requested that policy. This is not blanket authorization for external actions. |
| "expert mode" / "I want to review everything" | Set `approval-level: expert` in PROJECT.md → 2 checkpoints per agent |

## Pipeline Rule Enforcement (Archetype-Based)

At the start of every pipeline, after loading PROJECT.md, read the archetype to derive pipeline rules:

```bash
ARCHETYPE=$(grep "^archetype:" .great_cto/PROJECT.md 2>/dev/null | awk '{print $2}'); ARCHETYPE=${ARCHETYPE:-web-service}
```

All rules come from ARCHETYPES.md by archetype. No type-specific lookup. Agents read:
- **QA strategy** → ARCHETYPES.md `## QA Strategy by Archetype` + domain packs for `qa-extras`
- **Deploy method** → ARCHETYPES.md `## Deploy Method by Archetype`
- **Security gate** → ARCHETYPES.md archetype table (`mandatory` column) + TYPE_MAP.md Overrides
- **Compliance checklists** → `compliance:` params in PROJECT.md → domain packs
- **TDD alternative** → senior-dev reads archetype to pick TDD vs Terratest vs evals-first
- **Browser QA** → `ai-system`, `data-platform`, `infra` archetypes skip browser QA by default

**Composite types** (primary + secondary): merge rules at archetype level. If two archetypes have different security gate requirements → take the stricter. Threshold = strictest across both.

**Multi-region** — if PROJECT.md has `regions:` with 2+ values:
- architect includes region deploy ordering in ARCH doc
- devops deploys to canary region first, then others sequentially

## Fast Path (bugfix / patch)

Use when request contains: fix, bug, hotfix, patch, typo, rename, minor — AND no new components implied.

```
great_cto-senior-dev → QA + security (parallel) → GATE:SHIP → great_cto-devops
```

Tell CTO: "Small change — skipping architecture review."

## Full Pipeline (new feature)

**Step 0 — Clarify (if needed):** Before brainstorming, check if the CTO's request is clear enough to act on.

Clarify needed if ANY of these:
- Request is ≤5 words with no domain context (e.g. "add payments", "build auth")
- Request contains contradictory signals (e.g. "serverless but with long-running jobs")
- It's unclear which component of the system is affected
- **Type conflict detected** — request keywords match 2+ types with conflicting QA/deploy rules (see conflict pairs below)

**Known type conflict pairs** — if request matches both sides, ask CTO to pick:
| If request mentions | Ambiguous types | Ask |
|---|---|---|
| "REST API" + "tenant isolation" / "multi-tenant" | `rest-api` vs `saas-platform` | "Is this a standalone API or a multi-tenant SaaS product?" |
| "agent" alone | `ai-agent` vs `ai-agent-framework` | "Building an agent that does tasks, or a framework for building agents?" |
| "checkout" / "payment" + "shop" / "store" | `payment-service` vs `e-commerce` | "Is this a payment component or a full e-commerce product?" |
| "data" + "pipeline" + "warehouse" | `data-pipeline` vs `data-warehouse` | "Is this a data ingestion pipeline or a queryable data warehouse?" |
| "RAG" / "retrieval" + "pipeline" | `rag-system` vs `data-pipeline` | "Is retrieval the product, or a step in a larger data pipeline?" |
| "auth" + "payment" | `auth-service` vs `payment-service` | "Is auth the primary concern, or is this a payment service that needs auth?" |
| "web" + "SaaS" | `web-fullstack` vs `saas-platform` | "Is this a web app with tenant isolation, or a general web product?" |
| "MCP" / "tool server" + "library" | `mcp-server` vs `library-sdk` | "Is this a hosted MCP server or a publishable SDK?" |

If clarify needed → ask **ONE question only** (use the question from the table above, or a custom one):
> "Before I start architecture: [one specific question that unlocks the rest]"

Do NOT ask if the request is reasonably clear. When in doubt — proceed. Architect will surface gaps.

**Step 0b — Brainstorm:** Explore requirements before architecture. Per host:
- **Claude Code with superpowers:** invoke `superpowers:brainstorming` skill
- **Claude Code without superpowers / Codex / Cursor / Aider / Continue:**
  the architect agent runs an inline 5-question discovery (problem, users,
  success metric, constraints, non-goals) directly — no external skill needed
- If Skill tool fails with "Unknown skill" → spawn Agent(general-purpose) with prompt: "Brainstorm requirements for: <feature>. Output: goals, user flows, edge cases, open questions."
- Output feeds directly into Step 1 — architect reads the brainstorm notes before writing ARCH doc.

**Step 0c — Decision Brief (non-blocking CTO pre-read):** Before spawning architect, compile a 4-line brief in ~5 seconds:
```bash
# Risk signals: recent postmortems + retro patterns
LAST_PM=$(ls docs/postmortems/PM-*.md 2>/dev/null | sort -V | tail -1 | xargs grep -m1 "^#" 2>/dev/null | sed 's/# //')
RETRO=$(ls .great_cto/retrospectives/*.md 2>/dev/null | sort | tail -1 | xargs grep -m1 "What slowed down:" 2>/dev/null | sed 's/.*: //')
# Current load
OPEN_TASKS=$(bd list --status open 2>/dev/null | grep -c "task" || echo "?")
# Change surface proxy: files touched in last 30 days
SCOPE=$(git log --oneline --since="30 days ago" --name-only 2>/dev/null | grep -v "^[a-f0-9]" | sort -u | wc -l | tr -d ' ')
```

Show to CTO **before** any architecture work:
```
Decision Brief — <feature>
Risk signals: [LAST_PM or "no recent incidents"] | Retro pattern: [RETRO or "none"]
Current load: [OPEN_TASKS or "Beads not initialized"] open tasks | Change surface: ~[SCOPE or "new repo — no history"] files touched/30d
Alternatives hint: consider scoping down or buying before building if this touches >20 files

Proceed to architecture? → say "yes", describe changes, or "alternatives first"
```

**Cold start rules** — if this is a new project (no git history, no ARCH docs, no perf baseline):
- SCOPE=0 → show "new project — no git history yet" (not misleading "0 files touched")
- OPEN_TASKS=? → show "Beads not initialized yet" (not "?" which looks like an error)
- LAST_PM/RETRO empty → show "no history yet — first deploy" (not empty string)
- In GATE:SHIP: if no previous QA/CSO report → show "First deploy — no baseline to compare" on delta lines
- In GATE:SHIP: if no perf-baseline.log → show "First deploy — baseline will be set after this deploy"

**This is NOT a gate.** Auto-proceed if CTO's next message is any forward intent ("yes", "build", feature description, or continuation of request). Only pause if CTO explicitly says "alternatives first" or "scope down".

**Step 1 — Architect (opus):** Spawn `great_cto-architect`. Arch doc + ADR + Beads epic + gate:arch.

**GATE:ARCH** — show CTO:
```
Architecture ready → docs/architecture/ARCH-<feature>.md
• [decision 1]  • [decision 2]  • [decision 3]
Proceed? [yes/no]  ← auto-expires in 72h if no response
```
If CTO does not respond within 72h → mark gate:arch as rejected, tell CTO: "gate:arch expired — pipeline paused. Say 'approve arch' to resume or 'cancel' to drop." Do NOT auto-proceed past a gate.

**Step 1b — PM (sonnet):** Spawn `great_cto-pm` after gate:arch is approved. Skip for `project_size: nano`.

PM reads the ARCH doc and produces `docs/plans/PLAN-<feature>.md`:
- Mermaid Gantt + ASCII fallback
- Dependency graph + parallelism map
- Agent allocation (how many senior-devs concurrently)
- Timeline estimates (PoC/MVP/full mode, with buffer)
- `gate:plan` human checkpoint

**GATE:PLAN** — show CTO:
```
Plan ready → docs/plans/PLAN-<feature>.md
Tasks: N  |  Agents: M concurrent  |  Duration: Xh–Xh (excl. gate wait)
Approve plan? [yes/no/adjust: <changes>]
```
CTO may request adjustments (fewer agents, different parallelism, PoC mode). PM updates plan and re-presents. Do NOT unblock senior-dev until gate:plan is approved.

**Step 2 — Senior Dev(s):** Before spawning, check for active pipeline:
```bash
# Detect in-progress tasks (claimed by senior-dev)
bd list --status in-progress 2>/dev/null | head -5
# Check for open PRs from current feature branch
git branch --list "feature/*" 2>/dev/null | head -3
```
If active in-progress tasks exist → tell CTO: "Senior-dev is already working on: [task list]. Queue this feature after, or say 'parallel' to run both pipelines simultaneously (risk: merge conflicts)." Wait for CTO decision. Do NOT auto-spawn a second senior-dev unless CTO says "parallel".

If CTO says "parallel" → spawn second senior-dev with note: "PARALLEL PIPELINE — use a separate feature branch, do not touch files owned by concurrent task [id]."

Otherwise → Spawn `great_cto-senior-dev`. Claim task → TDD → PR → close.

**Step 2a — Formal Verification** (only for `smart-contract` and `defi-protocol` types): see `skills/great_cto/reference/formal-verification.md`.

**Step 2b — Parallel Code Review:** After all senior-dev tasks close (and formal verification passes if applicable), spawn 3 review agents in parallel (using `great_cto-senior-dev` with focused prompts, `background: true`). **All reviewers are read-only — must not edit files, apply patches, or commit.**
- **Performance reviewer** (`background: true`): "Review for performance issues only — N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations, blocking calls, missing indexes. File Beads bugs for P1+. READ ONLY — do not edit files."
- **Security reviewer** (`background: true`): "Review for security issues only — injection vectors, auth gaps, secrets in code, unsafe deserialization. File Beads bugs for P0/P1. READ ONLY — do not edit files."
- **Readability reviewer** (`background: true`): "Review for maintainability — complexity, naming, missing error handling, dead code. File Beads bugs for P2. READ ONLY — do not edit files."
Wait for all 3 to complete. Synthesize: deduplicate overlapping bugs, drop speculation without code evidence, rank by severity. Senior-dev fixes P0/P1 before proceeding.

**Step 2c — GATE:CODE** (only if `review_mode: strict` in PROJECT.md):
```bash
REVIEW_MODE=$(grep "^review_mode:" .great_cto/PROJECT.md 2>/dev/null | awk '{print $2}')
```
If `review_mode: strict` → create a code review gate and pause for CTO:
```bash
bd create "gate:code — PR review before QA" --type task --priority 0 --label gate
```
Show the CTO:
```
Code ready for review → [PR link from senior-dev output]
  Files changed: N  |  +X insertions  -Y deletions
  P0 bugs: [N]  P1 bugs: [N]  P2 bugs: [N]  (from code review)
  Reviewer notes: [top 3 findings from Step 2b synthesis]
Approve to continue to QA? [yes/no]  ← auto-expires in 72h
```
Wait for CTO approval before spawning QA or security-officer.

If `review_mode: auto` (default) → skip GATE:CODE, proceed directly to Step 3.

**Step 3 — QA + Security in parallel (quorum model):**
Before spawning, create gate:ship task:
```bash
bd create "gate:ship — deploy approval" --type task --priority 0 --label gate
```
Then spawn simultaneously — QA and Security are both required; treat as quorum (both must complete):
- Spawn `great_cto-qa-engineer` — code analysis + type-merged QA strategy...