bigquery-pipeline-audit — GitHub Copilot skill: pipeline safety checks
Skill audits Python + BigQuery scripts for cost leaks, idempotency, and production readiness. Catches uncontrolled loops, missing query cost limits, and unsafe writes—returns a structured report with exact line numbers.
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill bigquery-pipeline-auditWhat bigquery-pipeline-audit does
The skill runs six critical checks on your code. First, it hunts cost exposure: scans all BigQuery and external API calls, calculates worst-case retry counts, and flags missing maximum_bytes_billed limits. It demands a dry_run mode with zero billing and explicit confirmation before production runs.
Next, it reviews loop patterns. If your script executes one query per date or entity, that's a red flag. The skill suggests rewriting to a single set-based query with GENERATE_DATE_ARRAY or chunked loops with hard caps. It checks partition filters (no function wrapping), rejects SELECT *, and warns about many-to-many joins and expensive operations before filtering.
The core concern is idempotent writes. The skill requires either MERGE on a deterministic key, a staging table scoped to the run, or deduplication via ROW_NUMBER(). Finally, it verifies observability: job IDs logged, bytes and slot milliseconds recorded, a run summary with run_id, env, mode, date range, and job counts. Returns PASS/FAIL per section with a patch list ordered by risk.
What it helps with
- Prevent runaway BigQuery bills from uncontrolled loops in production
- Rewrite row-by-row queries into batch operations and reduce job count from thousands to tens
- Ensure reruns are safe and do not corrupt or duplicate data
- Verify partition filters actually prune data and eliminate full table scans
- Add cost and performance logging to every BigQuery job
Example prompts for the agent
- Audit this pipeline for cost safety and production readiness
- Find all idempotency problems in my BigQuery writes
- Is it safe to run this script against prod data every day
How to install bigquery-pipeline-audit
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill bigquery-pipeline-audit2GitHub CLI
gh skill install github/awesome-copilot bigquery-pipeline-audit3Manually: put the files in place
.github/skills/bigquery-pipeline-audit/SKILL.md1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill bigquery-pipeline-audit -a claude-code2Manually: put the files in place
~/.claude/skills/bigquery-pipeline-audit/SKILL.mdCopy the whole skill folder; for one project use .claude/skills/bigquery-pipeline-audit/
Manually: put the files in place
.agents/skills/bigquery-pipeline-audit/SKILL.mdFor all projects use ~/.agents/skills/
Manually: put the files in place
.cursor/skills/bigquery-pipeline-audit/SKILL.mdCursor also reads .agents/skills/ and .claude/skills/
Platform CLI
gemini skills install https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --path skills/bigquery-pipeline-auditManually: put the files in place
.devin/skills/bigquery-pipeline-audit/SKILL.mdThe legacy .windsurf/skills/ path still works
Claude.ai
Zip the folder and upload it in Settings → Capabilities → Skills
From the same set554
The whole set →Similar
Questions about bigquery-pipeline-audit
How do I install bigquery-pipeline-audit in GitHub Copilot?
Run npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill bigquery-pipeline-audit, then gh skill install github/awesome-copilot bigquery-pipeline-audit. Or add the SKILL.md file from .github/skills/bigquery-pipeline-audit/ to your repository.
What does bigquery-pipeline-audit check?
It analyzes Python code with BigQuery calls across six categories: cost exposure in loops and retries, missing maximum_bytes_billed limits, unsafe dry-run and execute modes, row-by-row backfill patterns, partition filter correctness, write idempotency, and observability gaps. Returns a PASS/FAIL verdict with exact patch suggestions.
What idempotency key should I use for my MERGE statements?
Typically a combination like entity_id + date + model_version or your own business logic key. The skill will examine your code and recommend the right key. Crucially: store run_id as metadata, not as part of your uniqueness key, unless you explicitly need multi-run history.
Source text
SKILL.md · MIT
---
name: bigquery-pipeline-audit
description: 'Audits Python + BigQuery pipelines for cost safety, idempotency, and production readiness. Returns a structured report with exact patch locations.'
---
# BigQuery Pipeline Audit: Cost, Safety and Production Readiness
You are a senior data engineer reviewing a Python + BigQuery pipeline script.
Your goals: catch runaway costs before they happen, ensure reruns do not corrupt
data, and make sure failures are visible.
Analyze the codebase and respond in the structure below (A to F + Final).
Reference exact function names and line locations. Suggest minimal fixes, not
rewrites.
---
## A) COST EXPOSURE: What will actually get billed?
Locate every BigQuery job trigger (`client.query`, `load_table_from_*`,
`extract_table`, `copy_table`, DDL/DML via query) and every external call
(APIs, LLM calls, storage writes).
For each, answer:
- Is this inside a loop, retry block, or async gather?
- What is the realistic worst-case call count?
- For each `client.query`, is `QueryJobConfig.maximum_bytes_billed` set?
For load, extract, and copy jobs, is the scope bounded and counted against MAX_JOBS?
- Is the same SQL and params being executed more than once in a single run?
Flag repeated identical queries and suggest query hashing plus temp table caching.
**Flag immediately if:**
- Any BQ query runs once per date or once per entity in a loop
- Worst-case BQ job count exceeds 20
- `maximum_bytes_billed` is missing on any `client.query` call
---
## B) DRY RUN AND EXECUTION MODES
Verify a `--mode` flag exists with at least `dry_run` and `execute` options.
- `dry_run` must print the plan and estimated scope with zero billed BQ execution
(BigQuery dry-run estimation via job config is allowed) and zero external API or LLM calls
- `execute` requires explicit confirmation for prod (`--env=prod --confirm`)
- Prod must not be the default environment
If missing, propose a minimal `argparse` patch with safe defaults.
---
## C) BACKFILL AND LOOP DESIGN
**Hard fail if:** the script runs one BQ query per date or per entity in a loop.
Check that date-range backfills use one of:
1. A single set-based query with `GENERATE_DATE_ARRAY`
2. A staging table loaded with all dates then one join query
3. Explicit chunks with a hard `MAX_CHUNKS` cap
Also check:
- Is the date range bounded by default (suggest 14 days max without `--override`)?
- If the script crashes mid-run, is it safe to re-run without double-writing?
- For backdated simulations, verify data is read from time-consistent snapshots
(`FOR SYSTEM_TIME AS OF`, partitioned as-of tables, or dated snapshot tables).
Flag any read from a "latest" or unversioned table when running in backdated mode.
Suggest a concrete rewrite if the current approach is row-by-row.
---
## D) QUERY SAFETY AND SCAN SIZE
For each query, check:
- **Partition filter** is on the raw column, not `DATE(ts)`, `CAST(...)`, or
any function that prevents pruning
- **No `SELECT *`**: only columns actually used downstream
- **Joins will not explode**: verify join keys are unique or appropriately scoped
and flag any potential many-to-many
- **Expensive operations** (`REGEXP`, `JSON_EXTRACT`, UDFs) only run after
partition filtering, not on full table scans
Provide a specific SQL fix for any query that fails these checks.
---
## E) SAFE WRITES AND IDEMPOTENCY
Identify every write operation. Flag plain `INSERT`/append with no dedup logic.
Each write should use one of:
1. `MERGE` on a deterministic key (e.g., `entity_id + date + model_version`)
2. Write to a staging table scoped to the run, then swap or merge into final
3. Append-only with a dedupe view:
`QUALIFY ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY <key>) = 1`
Also check:
- Will a re-run create duplicate rows?
- Is the write disposition (`WRITE_TRUNCATE` vs `WRITE_APPEND`) intentional
and documented?
- Is `run_id` being used as part of the merge or dedupe key? If so, flag it.
`run_id` should be stored as a metadata column, not as part of the uniqueness
key, unless you explicitly want multi-run history.
State the recommended approach and the exact dedup key for this codebase.
---
## F) OBSERVABILITY: Can you debug a failure?
Verify:
- Failures raise exceptions and abort with no silent `except: pass` or warn-only
- Each BQ job logs: job ID, bytes processed or billed when available,
slot milliseconds, and duration
- A run summary is logged or written at the end containing:
`run_id, env, mode, date_range, tables written, total BQ jobs, total bytes`
- `run_id` is present and consistent across all log lines
If `run_id` is missing, propose a one-line fix:
`run_id = run_id or datetime.utcnow().strftime('%Y%m%dT%H%M%S')`
---
## Final
**1. PASS / FAIL** with specific reasons per section (A to F).
**2. Patch list** ordered by risk, referencing exact functions to change.
**3. If FAIL: Top 3 cost risks** with a rough worst-case estimate
(e.g., "loop over 90 dates x 3 retries = 270 BQ jobs").
© github · MIT · github/awesome-copilot