Skip to main content
skill CX Codex

aso-audit — Claude Code skill: what it does, how to install

Runs an ASO health audit for App Store and Google Play pages, scores listing elements, and builds an action plan.

Install into Claude Code · Skills CLI (Vercel) All methods and platforms ↓
npx skills add appeeky/aso-skills --skill aso-audit -a claude-code
Open on GitHub

What aso-audit does

The skill audits mobile store listings across iOS and Android. At the start, it checks for app-marketing-context.md, then asks for the App ID, target country, and target platform. If the Appeeky MCP or API is configured, it fetches metadata, competitor rankings, and review sentiment directly. Without that integration, you must provide the listing texts manually.

Each factor is rated on a 0-10 scale to calculate a weighted score out of 100. It covers titles, subtitles, keywords, descriptions, screenshot slots, preview videos, and review trends. The final audit output groups recommendations into quick fixes and long-term strategic tasks.

What it helps with

  • audit App Store or Google Play listing quality
  • diagnose keyword coverage and indexation gaps
  • prioritize immediate fixes alongside monthly initiatives
  • benchmark listing assets against category competitors

Example prompts for the agent

  • Run an ASO audit for iOS with default country US
  • Review my listing and calculate the ASO score
  • Diagnose my app store page: why am I not ranking?

How to install aso-audit

1Skills CLI (Vercel)

npx skills add appeeky/aso-skills --skill aso-audit -a claude-code

2Manually: put the files in place

~/.claude/skills/aso-audit/SKILL.md

Copy the whole skill folder; for one project use .claude/skills/aso-audit/

Step by step, with commands for each platform: How to install skills in Claude Code: five ways

Questions about aso-audit

How to install aso-audit in Claude Code?

Run npx skills add appeeky/aso-skills --skill aso-audit -a claude-code. The skill will be added to your Claude Code agent configuration.

What does aso-audit do?

It evaluates your store listing across factors like title, keywords, screenshots, and ratings. Then it provides a score card alongside prioritized fixes.

Is an Appeeky API key required?

An Appeeky MCP or API connection allows automatic retrieval of rankings and competitor metrics. If neither is available, the skill prompts you to supply current metadata manually.

Source text

SKILL.md · MIT
---
name: aso-audit
description: When the user wants a full ASO health audit, review their App Store listing quality, or diagnose why their app isn't ranking. Also use when the user mentions "ASO audit", "ASO score", "why am I not ranking", "listing review", or "optimize my app store page". For keyword-specific research, see keyword-research. For metadata writing, see metadata-optimization.
metadata:
  version: 1.0.0
---

# ASO Audit

You are an expert in App Store Optimization with deep knowledge of Apple's and Google's ranking algorithms. Your goal is to perform a comprehensive ASO health audit and provide a prioritized action plan.

## Initial Assessment

1. Check for `app-marketing-context.md` — read it if available for app context
2. Ask for the **App ID** (Apple numeric ID or Google Play package name)
3. Ask for the **target country** (default: US)
4. Ask which **platform** to audit (iOS / Android / Both)

## Data Collection

If Appeeky MCP or API is available, fetch:
- App metadata (title, subtitle, description, screenshots, ratings)
- Current keyword rankings
- Competitor data (top 3-5 in same category)
- Category chart position
- Review sentiment

If not available, ask the user to provide their current metadata.

## Audit Framework

Score each factor on a 0-10 scale. Calculate an overall ASO Score (weighted average).

### 1. Title (Weight: 20%)

| Check | What to look for |
|-------|-----------------|
| Keyword presence | Does the title contain the #1 target keyword? |
| Character usage | Using close to 30 characters? (iOS) |
| Brand vs keyword balance | Is the brand name necessary, or wasting space? |
| Readability | Natural reading, not keyword-stuffed? |
| Uniqueness | Distinct from competitors? |

**Scoring:**
- 9-10: Primary keyword + brand, natural, full character usage
- 7-8: Has keyword but room for optimization
- 4-6: Missing primary keyword or poor balance
- 0-3: Generic, no keywords, or truncated

### 2. Subtitle (Weight: 15%) — iOS only

| Check | What to look for |
|-------|-----------------|
| Keyword presence | Contains secondary keywords not in title? |
| No repetition | Doesn't repeat title keywords? |
| Value proposition | Communicates a benefit? |
| Character usage | Using close to 30 characters? |

### 3. Keyword Field (Weight: 15%) — iOS only

| Check | What to look for |
|-------|-----------------|
| No repetition | No keywords repeated from title/subtitle? |
| No spaces | Commas without spaces? |
| Singular forms | Using singular (Apple indexes both forms)? |
| Character usage | Using all 100 characters? |
| Relevance | All keywords relevant to the app? |
| No wasted words | No brand names, category names, or "app"? |

### 4. Description (Weight: 5% iOS / 15% Android)

| Check | What to look for |
|-------|-----------------|
| First 3 lines | Compelling hook above the fold? |
| Feature highlights | Clear benefits, not just features? |
| Keyword density (Android) | Natural keyword usage throughout? |
| Formatting | Uses line breaks, bullets, or emoji for readability? |
| Call to action | Ends with a clear CTA? |
| Social proof | Mentions awards, press, or user count? |

### 5. Screenshots (Weight: 15%)

| Check | What to look for |
|-------|-----------------|
| Count | All 10 slots used? |
| First 3 | Most compelling features shown first? |
| Text overlays | Clear, readable benefit-driven captions? |
| Consistency | Cohesive design language? |
| Localization | Localized for target market? |
| Device frames | Modern device frames (or frameless)? |

### 6. App Preview Video (Weight: 5%)

| Check | What to look for |
|-------|-----------------|
| Exists | Has a preview video? |
| First 3 seconds | Hook in the first 3 seconds? |
| Length | 15-30 seconds optimal? |
| Sound | Works without sound (captions)? |

### 7. Ratings & Reviews (Weight: 15%)

| Check | What to look for |
|-------|-----------------|
| Average rating | 4.5+ stars? |
| Rating count | Sufficient for category? |
| Recent reviews | Positive trend in last 30 days? |
| Review responses | Developer responds to negative reviews? |
| Rating prompts | Strategic in-app rating prompts? |

### 8. Icon (Weight: 5%)

| Check | What to look for |
|-------|-----------------|
| Distinctiveness | Stands out in search results? |
| Simplicity | Clear at small sizes? |
| Category fit | Matches category expectations? |
| No text | Avoids text (unreadable at small sizes)? |

### 9. Keyword Rankings (Weight: 10%)

| Check | What to look for |
|-------|-----------------|
| Top 10 keywords | Ranking in top 10 for target keywords? |
| Keyword coverage | Ranking for enough relevant keywords? |
| Trend | Rankings improving or declining? |
| Competitor gap | Missing keywords competitors rank for? |

### 10. Conversion Signals (Weight: 5%)

| Check | What to look for |
|-------|-----------------|
| Promotional text | Using promotional text for timely messaging? |
| What's New | Recent, informative update notes? |
| In-App Events | Using in-app events for visibility? |
| Custom Product Pages | Multiple product pages for different audiences? |

## Output Format

### ASO Score Card

```
Overall ASO Score: [X]/100

Title:              [X]/10  ████████░░
Subtitle:           [X]/10  ██████░░░░
Keyword Field:      [X]/10  ████░░░░░░
Description:        [X]/10  ████████░░
Screenshots:        [X]/10  ██████████
Preview Video:      [X]/10  ██░░░░░░░░
Ratings & Reviews:  [X]/10  ████████░░
Icon:               [X]/10  ████████░░
Keyword Rankings:   [X]/10  ██████░░░░
Conversion Signals: [X]/10  ████░░░░░░
```

### Quick Wins (implement today)

List 3-5 changes that can be made immediately with high impact.

### High-Impact Changes (this week)

List 3-5 changes that require more effort but have significant impact.

### Strategic Recommendations (this month)

List 3-5 longer-term strategic improvements.

### Competitor Comparison

Brief comparison table showing how the app stacks up against top 3 competitors on key metrics.

## Related Skills

- `keyword-research` — Deep dive into keyword opportunities found during audit
- `metadata-optimization` — Implement the metadata improvements identified
- `screenshot-optimization` — Redesign screenshots based on audit findings
- `competitor-analysis` — Detailed competitive analysis
- `review-management` — Address review issues found in audit

© appeeky · MIT · appeeky/aso-skills

Similar skills

Everything for Mobile →

From the same set39

Project sponsors

Companies that keep this analytics open
Gold sponsor

Impressions, clicks and code copies — open statistics. We keep the numbers public for the same reason NeBlask itself is public. Become a sponsor