Skip to main content
skill GitHub Copilot official · GitHub

ad-campaign-analyzer — GitHub Copilot skill: ad analysis

Analyzes campaign performance data to help decide what to pause, scale, or test. Use it when you have ad results to review, rather than when planning a campaign from scratch.

Install into GitHub Copilot · Skills CLI (Vercel) All methods and platforms ↓
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill ad-campaign-analyzer
Open on GitHub

What ad-campaign-analyzer does

The skill normalizes campaign metrics, compares channels, and flags spend with no conversions, high-CPA campaigns, and ads with low CTR. It also identifies strong ads and audiences, checks statistical significance for A/B tests, and suggests how to reallocate budget.

You can provide a CSV export from Google Ads, Meta Ads Manager, or LinkedIn Campaign Manager, a pasted table, or a screenshot. For multi-channel data, it creates a channel-level summary. Funnel figures can be used to adjust customer acquisition cost based on lead conversion rates. It uses no external tools, network calls, or API keys.

Campaign performance data is required; the skill is not meant for campaign planning or creative generation without it. Install it if you want recommendations based on results from campaigns that are already running.

What it helps with

  • find campaigns and ads with no conversions
  • compare CPA and ROAS across channels
  • identify audiences with a low CPA
  • check whether an A/B test has enough data for a decision
  • reallocate ad budget across channels

Example prompts for the agent

  • Analyze this Google Ads CSV and tell me which campaigns to pause.
  • Compare spend and conversions across Meta Ads and LinkedIn Ads. How should I reallocate the budget?
  • Check whether this A/B test has enough data to pick a winning ad.

How to install ad-campaign-analyzer

1Skills CLI (Vercel)

npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill ad-campaign-analyzer

2GitHub CLI

gh skill install github/awesome-copilot ad-campaign-analyzer

3Manually: put the files in place

.github/skills/ad-campaign-analyzer/SKILL.md

From the same set554

The whole set →
git-commit official github This skill reviews Git changes, stages related files, and creates Conventional Commits. Use it when you want an agent to make one commit or split work into separate commits. GitHub Copilot 47,165installs excalidraw-diagram-generator official github Turn a plain-language description into an Excalidraw diagram. Useful for mapping processes, system structure, and relationships between entities. GitHub Copilot 31,639installs multi-stage-dockerfile official github This skill guides GitHub Copilot in writing multi-stage Dockerfiles for different languages and frameworks. Use it when the final runtime image should contain fewer build dependencies. GitHub Copilot 29,688installs documentation-writer official github Skill that turns the agent into a technical writer following the Diátaxis framework: tutorials, how-to guides, reference, and explanation. Proposes structure before writing. GitHub Copilot 27,757installs prd official github Turns a feature idea into a structured PRD with user stories, technical requirements, and risks. Use it when planning a software feature or an AI-powered one. GitHub Copilot 24,035installs refactor official github This skill reshapes existing code without changing its external behavior. Use it for gradual cleanup of large functions, duplication, weak types, and code smells. GitHub Copilot 22,321installs java-springboot official github Gives GitHub Copilot Spring Boot development practices, from project layout to tests and security. Use it when writing or reviewing Java application code. GitHub Copilot 21,272installs create-readme official github This skill reviews a project and creates a structured README.md. Use it when the repository needs clear documentation based on its actual files and code. GitHub Copilot 19,081installs

Similar

cmo-review Alireza Rezvani This skill tests positioning, ICP, messaging, and channel mix before a campaign. Use it when CAC rises or the one-sentence positioning test fails. Claude Code 386installs social-evidence-research Seth Hobson Builds traceable reports from public social discussion and supplied exports. Use it to compare a topic, audit research, and mark access gaps. Claude Code CX Codex Cursor 201installs market-research claude-code-skills A skill for sizing markets, planning surveys, and scoring segments. Use it when your analysis needs visible methods and assumptions. Claude Code 232installs local-seo-manager Stan Varashilov (Steffonet) This skill audits Google Business Profile, drafts neighborhood service pages and checks business details across directories. Use it for a business that serves customers at their location. Claude Code 90installs seo-audit coreyhaines31 Diagnoses technical SEO issues, indexing drops, and metadata errors. Identifies why your site is losing organic search rankings in Google. Claude Code CX Codex Cursor +1 236,800installs brand claudekit Keeps brand voice, visual rules and design tokens in one markdown file, then feeds them to your agent's prompts and to your CSS variables. Claude Code CX Codex Cursor +1 39,500installs banner-design claudekit Generates banners for social media, ads, and web hero sections using HTML/CSS. Useful when you need fast visual creative assets directly in your coding agent. Claude Code CX Codex Cursor +1 39,000installs marketing-psychology coreyhaines31 Applies behavioral science and mental models to marketing decisions. It helps teams analyze buyer motivations and solve funnel bottlenecks. Claude Code CX Codex Cursor +1 164,000installs

Questions about ad-campaign-analyzer

How do I install ad-campaign-analyzer in GitHub Copilot?

Run npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill ad-campaign-analyzer. You can also install it with gh skill install github/awesome-copilot ad-campaign-analyzer.

What does ad-campaign-analyzer do?

It reviews campaign metrics, finds weak spots and strong performers, compares channels, and recommends budget changes.

What data can I give the skill?

A CSV export from Google Ads, Meta Ads Manager, or LinkedIn Campaign Manager, a pasted performance table, or a dashboard screenshot.

Source text

SKILL.md · MIT
---
name: ad-campaign-analyzer
description: 'Use this skill when the user shares ad campaign performance data and asks what to cut, scale, or test. Trigger for prompts like "analyze my ad campaigns", "where am I wasting ad spend", "reallocate my ad budget", "which ads are actually working", or "ROAS analysis". Do not trigger for campaign planning or creative generation without performance data.'
license: MIT
compatibility: 'Cross-platform. Pure reasoning skill over user-provided campaign exports (CSV, paste, or screenshot from Google, Meta, or LinkedIn) — no external tools, network calls, or API keys.'
metadata:
  version: "1.0"
  author: GooseWorks
  source: https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills
---

# Ad Campaign Analyzer

Take raw campaign performance data and turn it into clear decisions. This skill doesn't just summarize metrics — it diagnoses problems, identifies winners, checks statistical significance, and tells you exactly what to cut, scale, and test next. Then it goes further: it compares channels on equal terms, finds where you're over-spending vs under-spending relative to results, and produces a concrete budget reallocation plan.

**Core principle:** Most startup founders check their ad dashboard, see a ROAS number, and either panic or celebrate. This skill gives you the nuanced analysis a paid media specialist would: what's actually significant, what's noise, and where your next dollar should go. It also solves the allocation problem — most startups either spread budget too thin across channels (no channel gets enough to learn) or dump everything into one channel (missing cheaper opportunities elsewhere).

## When to Use

- "Analyze my Google Ads performance"
- "Which ads should I kill?"
- "Is this campaign working?"
- "Where am I wasting ad spend?"
- "Optimize my Meta Ads"
- "How should I split my ad budget?"
- "Should I spend more on Google or Meta?"
- "Reallocate my ad spend across channels"
- "Where am I getting the best return?"
- "I have $X/month for ads — how should I distribute it?"

## Phase 0: Intake

1. **Campaign data** — One of:
   - CSV export from Google Ads / Meta Ads Manager / LinkedIn Campaign Manager
   - Pasted performance table
   - Screenshots of dashboard (we'll extract the data)
2. **Platform(s)** — Google / Meta / LinkedIn / All
3. **Time period** — What date range does this cover?
4. **Monthly budget** — Total ad spend in this period
5. **Primary goal** — What conversion are you optimizing for? (Demos / Trials / Purchases / Leads)
6. **Target metrics** — Do you have target CPA or ROAS? (If not, we'll benchmark)
7. **Any known changes?** — Did you change creative, budget, or targeting during this period?
8. **Channels currently running** — Google Ads, Meta Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Twitter/X Ads, TikTok Ads, other
9. **Funnel data** (if available):
   - Lead → MQL rate
   - MQL → SQL rate
   - SQL → Close rate
   - Average deal size
10. **Channels you're considering but haven't tried** — Want to test new channels?
11. **Constraints** — Minimum spend on any channel? Platform you must stay on?

## Phase 1: Data Ingestion & Normalization

### Accepted Data Formats

| Source | Key Columns Expected |
|--------|---------------------|
| **Google Ads** | Campaign, Ad Group, Keyword, Impressions, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Conv Rate, Cost, Conv Value |
| **Meta Ads** | Campaign, Ad Set, Ad, Impressions, Reach, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Cost Per Result, Amount Spent, ROAS |
| **LinkedIn Ads** | Campaign, Impressions, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Cost, Leads |

Normalize all data into a standard analysis format:

| Dimension | Impressions | Clicks | CTR | CPC | Conversions | Conv Rate | CPA | Spend | Revenue/Value |
|-----------|------------|--------|-----|-----|-------------|----------|-----|-------|--------------|

### Multi-Channel Normalization

When data spans multiple channels, also produce a channel-level rollup:

| Channel | Monthly Spend | Impressions | Clicks | CTR | CPC | Conversions | Conv Rate | CPA | ROAS | CAC* |
|---------|-------------|------------|--------|-----|-----|-------------|----------|-----|------|------|
| Google Search | $[X] | [N] | [N] | [X%] | $[X] | [N] | [X%] | $[X] | [X] | $[X] |
| Google Display | ... | | | | | | | | | |
| Meta (FB/IG) | ... | | | | | | | | | |
| LinkedIn | ... | | | | | | | | | |
| [Other] | ... | | | | | | | | | |
| **Total** | $[X] | | | | | [N] | | $[X] avg | [X] avg | $[X] avg |

*CAC = Full customer acquisition cost if funnel data provided (CPA × close-rate adjustment)

### Funnel-Adjusted CAC (If Funnel Data Available)

```
Channel CAC = CPA ÷ (MQL rate × SQL rate × Close rate)
```

This reveals which channels produce leads that actually close, not just convert.

## Phase 2: Performance Diagnostics

### 2A: Campaign-Level Health Check

For each campaign:

| Metric | Value | Benchmark | Status |
|--------|-------|-----------|--------|
| CTR | [X%] | [Industry avg] | [Good/Okay/Poor] |
| CPC | $[X] | [Category avg] | [Good/Okay/Poor] |
| Conv Rate | [X%] | [Benchmark] | [Good/Okay/Poor] |
| CPA | $[X] | [Target or benchmark] | [Good/Okay/Poor] |
| ROAS | [X] | [Target or benchmark] | [Good/Okay/Poor] |
| Impression Share | [X%] | [>60% ideal] | [Good/Okay/Poor] |

### 2B: Budget Waste Detection

Identify spend that produced no or negative return:

| Waste Type | Signal | Action |
|-----------|--------|--------|
| **Zero-conversion keywords/ads** | Spend > $[X] with 0 conversions | Pause or add negatives |
| **High CPA outliers** | CPA > 3x target | Pause or restructure |
| **Low CTR ads** | CTR < 50% of campaign average | Replace creative |
| **Broad match bleed** | Search terms report showing irrelevant clicks | Add negative keywords |
| **Audience overlap** | Same users hit by multiple campaigns | Exclude audiences |
| **Dayparting waste** | Conversions cluster at certain hours; spend is 24/7 | Set ad schedule |

### 2C: Winner Identification

Find what's actually working:

| Winner Type | Signal | Action |
|------------|--------|--------|
| **Top-performing keywords** | Lowest CPA, highest conv rate | Increase bid, add variants |
| **Winning ads** | Highest CTR + conv rate combo | Scale spend, clone for other groups |
| **Best audiences** | Lowest CPA segment | Increase budget allocation |
| **Best times** | Peak conversion hours/days | Concentrate budget |

### 2D: Statistical Significance Check

For any A/B test (ad variants, audiences, landing pages):

```
Test: [Variant A] vs [Variant B]
Metric: [Conv Rate / CTR / CPA]
Variant A: [X%] (n=[sample_size])
Variant B: [Y%] (n=[sample_size])
Confidence level: [X%]
Verdict: [Statistically significant / Not enough data / Too close to call]
Recommended action: [Pick winner / Continue test / Increase budget to reach significance]
```

Minimum sample: 100 clicks per variant for CTR tests, 30 conversions per variant for CPA tests.

## Phase 3: Funnel Analysis

### Click → Conversion Path

```
Impressions: [N] (100%)
     ↓ CTR: [X%]
Clicks: [N] ([X%] of impressions)
     ↓ Landing page → Conversion: [X%]
Conversions: [N] ([X%] of clicks)
     ↓ Conversion → Revenue: $[X] avg
Revenue: $[N]
```

### Funnel Drop-Off Diagnosis

| Drop-Off Point | Rate | Benchmark | Likely Cause | Fix |
|----------------|------|-----------|-------------|-----|
| Impression → Click | [CTR%] | [Benchmark] | [Ad relevance / targeting] | [Copy/targeting change] |
| Click → Conversion | [Conv%] | [Benchmark] | [Landing page / offer / audience mismatch] | [LP optimization] |
| Conversion → Revenue | [Close%] | [Benchmark] | [Lead quality / sales process] | [Qualification criteria] |

## Phase 4: Budget Reallocation

When data spans multiple channels, perform cross-channel budget optimization.

### 4A: Channel Efficiency Ranking

| Rank | Channel | CPA | Funnel-Adj CAC | Share of Spend | Share of Conversions | Efficiency Index |
|------|---------|-----|---------------|----------------|---------------------|-----------------|
| 1 | [Channel] | $[X] | $[X] | [X%] | [X%] | [Conv share ÷ Spend share] |

**Efficiency Index:**
- **> 1.0** = Under-invested (getting more than its share of conversions)
- **= 1.0** = Proportional (fair share)
- **< 1.0** = Over-invested (getting less than its share)

### 4B: Marginal Return Analysis

For each channel, estimate if additional spend would yield proportional returns:

| Channel | Current CPA | Impression Share / Saturation Signal | Marginal Return Estimate |
|---------|-------------|-------------------------------------|------------------------|
| Google Search | $[X] | [X%] impression share — room to grow | Likely positive |
| Meta | $[X] | Frequency [X] — audience may be saturated | Diminishing |
| LinkedIn | $[X] | Low volume — limited targeting pool | Ceiling soon |

### 4C: Funnel Stage Coverage

| Funnel Stage | Channels Covering It | Current Spend | Gap? |
|-------------|---------------------|--------------|------|
| **Awareness** (top) | [Meta Display, YouTube] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |
| **Consideration** (mid) | [Google Search, Meta retargeting] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |
| **Decision** (bottom) | [Google Brand, Google Search] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |
| **Retargeting** | [Meta, Google Display] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |

### 4D: Budget Shift Recommendations

| Channel | Current Spend | Recommended Spend | Change | Reasoning |
|---------|-------------|------------------|--------|-----------|
| Google Search | $[X] | $[Y] | +$[Z] | [Lowest CPA, room to scale] |
| Meta | $[X] | $[Y] | -$[Z] | [Audience saturation, frequency too high] |
| LinkedIn | $[X] | $[Y] | $0 | [Maintain — niche but valuable] |
| [New channel] | $0 | $[Y] | +$[Y] | [Test budget — competitors succeeding here] |
| **Total** | $[X] | $[X] | $0 | Budget-neutral reallocation |

### 4E: Scenario Modeling

**Scenario 1: Conservative shift (+/- 20%)**
- Expected conversions: [N] (currently [N]) = [X%] improvement
- Expected blended CPA: $[X] (currently $[X])
- Risk: Low

**Scenario 2: Aggressive shift (+/- 40%)**
- Expected conversions: [N] = [X%] improvement
- Expected blended CPA: $[X]
- Risk: Medium — less data on scaled channels

**Scenario 3: Budget increase to $[Y]/mo**
- Recommended allocation: [table]
- Expected conversions: [N]
- New channels to test: [list]

## Phase 5: Output Format

```markdown
# Ad Campaign Analysis — [Product/Client] — [DATE]

Period: [Date range]
Total spend: $[X]
Platform(s): [Google / Meta / LinkedIn]
Primary goal: [Conversions / Revenue / Leads]

---

## Executive Summary

[3-5 sentences: Overall performance verdict, biggest win, biggest problem, top recommendation including any reallocation moves]

---

## Performance Dashboard

| Campaign | Spend | Impressions | Clicks | CTR | CPC | Conversions | CPA | ROAS | Verdict |
|----------|-------|------------|--------|-----|-----|-------------|-----|------|---------|
| [Name] | $[X] | [N] | [N] | [X%] | $[X] | [N] | $[X] | [X] | [Scale/Optimize/Pause] |

---

## Budget Waste Report

**Total estimated waste: $[X] ([X%] of total spend)**

### Wasted on zero-conversion items: $[X]
[List of keywords/ads/audiences with spend but no conversions]

### Wasted on high-CPA items: $[X]
[List of items with CPA > 3x target]

### Recommended saves: $[X]/month
[Specific items to pause]

---

## Winners to Scale

### Top Keywords/Audiences
| Item | CPA | Conv Rate | Current Spend | Recommended Spend |
|------|-----|----------|--------------|-------------------|

### Top Ads
| Ad | CTR | Conv Rate | Why It Works |
|----|-----|----------|-------------|

---

## A/B Test Results

### [Test Name]
- Variant A: [Metric] (n=[N])
- Variant B: [Metric] (n=[N])
- Confidence: [X%]
- **Verdict:** [Winner / Continue / Inconclusive]

---

## Budget Reallocation

### Current vs Recommended Allocation

| Channel | Current | Recommended | Change | Why |
|---------|---------|------------|--------|-----|
| [Channel] | $[X] | $[Y] | [+/-$Z] | [1-line reason] |

**Projected impact:**
- Conversions: [N] → [N] (+[X%])
- Blended CPA: $[X] → $[Y] (-[X%])

### Funnel Stage Coverage
[Coverage map with gaps identified]

### New Channel Recommendations

#### [Channel Name]
- **Why test:** [Reasoning]
- **Recommended test budget:** $[X]/mo for [X weeks]
- **Success criteria:** CPA < $[X]
- **Competitors using it:** [Yes/No — who]

---

## Action Plan

### Immediate (This Week)
- [ ] **Pause:** [Specific items — keywords, ads, audiences]
- [ ] **Scale:** [Specific items — increase budget/bids]
- [ ] **Add negatives:** [Specific keywords from search terms]
- [ ] **Reallocate:** [Specific dollar shifts between channels]

### This Month
- [ ] **Test:** [New ad angles / audiences / landing pages]
- [ ] **Restructure:** [Ad groups that need splitting or merging]
- [ ] **Optimize:** [Bid strategy changes]
- [ ] **Monitor reallocation:** Track CPA shifts on scaled channels, watch for diminishing returns

### Next Month
- [ ] **Expand:** [New campaigns / channels to test]
- [ ] **Re-evaluate:** [Run this analysis again with new data, adjust allocations based on actual results]
```

Save to `campaign-analysis-[YYYY-MM-DD].md` in the current working directory (or user-specified path).

## Cost

| Component | Cost |
|-----------|------|
| Data analysis | Free (LLM reasoning) |
| Statistical calculations | Free |
| **Total** | **Free** |

## Tools Required

- No external tools needed — pure reasoning skill
- User provides campaign data as CSV, paste, or screenshot

## Trigger Phrases

- "Analyze my ad campaign performance"
- "Which ads should I pause?"
- "Where am I wasting ad budget?"
- "Is my Google Ads campaign working?"
- "Optimize my Meta Ads spend"
- "How should I allocate my ad budget?"
- "Should I spend more on Google or Meta?"
- "Reallocate my ad spend"
- "Where am I getting the best ROAS?"
- "Optimize my multi-channel ad budget"

© GooseWorks · MIT · github/awesome-copilot

See also

Project sponsors

Companies that keep this analytics open
Gold sponsor

Impressions, clicks and code copies — open statistics. We keep the numbers public for the same reason NeBlask itself is public. Become a sponsor