secrets-in-file-metadata — Claude Code skill: read file metadata
Pulls EXIF, XMP, IPTC and Office or PDF properties with exiftool: GPS, camera serial, authors, timestamps. Useful when you need to know where a file came from.
npx skills add UseOSINT/Skills --skill secrets-in-file-metadata -a claude-codeWhat secrets-in-file-metadata does
The skill teaches the agent to read embedded metadata and to stop short of overclaiming. It opens with a table mapping what you have to where you should look: a photo pulled from a social platform has usually been re-encoded and stripped, while a file served from a forum or a direct link often keeps its GPS. For a folder from one source there is a bulk pass that dumps tags to CSV so you can spot the outlier and the tags shared across files.
A large section covers exiftool flags. -G1 prefixes each tag with its group, -a keeps duplicates instead of the last value, -u surfaces vendor tags exiftool has no name for, -n prints coordinates as signed decimals. Duplicates matter: the same timestamp with two different values in two blocks means two programs disagreed, so the file was edited. For DOCX and PDF the skill says to unzip the container or run a structural parser afterwards, because tracked changes, comment authors and embedded images with intact EXIF do not show up in exiftool.
The point worth keeping: every tag is a claim written by whatever software touched the file last, and one command can change it. That is why FileModifyDate says nothing about a photograph, and why missing metadata is the normal state of anything that went through a platform. Video needs ffprobe on top. exiftool has to be installed on your machine.
What it helps with
- read GPS coordinates out of a photo as decimal degrees
- link images from separate accounts through a camera serial number
- check who is listed as the author of a DOCX or PDF
- compare the embedded thumbnail against the main image to catch a crop
- scan a folder and surface the files whose metadata breaks the pattern
Example prompts for the agent
- Read the metadata in photo.jpg with exiftool and tell me if there is GPS and a camera serial
- Walk the uploads folder recursively and dump every file with GPS coordinates to CSV
- Check who is listed as the author in report.docx and what else is filled in
How to install secrets-in-file-metadata
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add UseOSINT/Skills --skill secrets-in-file-metadata -a claude-code2Manually: put the files in place
~/.claude/skills/secrets-in-file-metadata/SKILL.mdCopy the whole skill folder; for one project use .claude/skills/secrets-in-file-metadata/
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add UseOSINT/Skills --skill secrets-in-file-metadata -a codex2Manually: put the files in place
.agents/skills/secrets-in-file-metadata/SKILL.mdFor all projects use ~/.agents/skills/
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add UseOSINT/Skills --skill secrets-in-file-metadata -a cursor2Manually: put the files in place
.cursor/skills/secrets-in-file-metadata/SKILL.mdCursor also reads .agents/skills/ and .claude/skills/
1GitHub CLI
gh skill install UseOSINT/Skills secrets-in-file-metadata2Manually: put the files in place
.github/skills/secrets-in-file-metadata/SKILL.md1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add UseOSINT/Skills --skill secrets-in-file-metadata -a gemini-cli2Platform CLI
gemini skills install https://github.com/UseOSINT/Skills --path skills/secrets-in-file-metadataManually: put the files in place
.devin/skills/secrets-in-file-metadata/SKILL.mdThe legacy .windsurf/skills/ path still works
Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add UseOSINT/Skills --skill secrets-in-file-metadata -a opencodeClaude.ai
Zip the folder and upload it in Settings → Capabilities → Skills
Step by step, with commands for each platform: How to install skills in Claude Code: five ways
Questions about secrets-in-file-metadata
How do I install secrets-in-file-metadata in Claude?
Run npx skills add UseOSINT/Skills --skill secrets-in-file-metadata -a claude-code. The skill then sits at ~/.claude/skills/secrets-in-file-metadata/SKILL.md.
What does secrets-in-file-metadata do?
It extracts embedded file metadata: EXIF with GPS and device data, XMP and IPTC blocks, and Office or PDF properties such as author, company and revision counts. It also explains which tags prove nothing.
Does the skill need exiftool installed?
Yes, every command in it is built on exiftool. For video it adds ffprobe, and for DOCX and PDF it suggests unzipping the container or using a structural parser.
Source text
SKILL.md · MIT
--- name: secrets-in-file-metadata description: >- Extract and interpret embedded file metadata with exiftool — EXIF GPS coordinates, camera make, model and serial, DateTimeOriginal and CreateDate timestamps, XMP and IPTC fields, and Office and PDF properties such as Author, Company, LastModifiedBy, template paths and revision counts. Use when reading EXIF from a photo, checking who really wrote a document, dating a file, fingerprinting a camera or phone, or investigating provenance in JPEG, HEIC, RAW, MP4, DOCX, XLSX or PDF. Applies to document-provenance disputes, insider-leak attribution, evidence handling, and pre-publication redaction checks. Reference at useosint.com/skills/secrets-in-file-metadata. --- # Secrets in file metadata The fastest lead in an investigation is often already inside the file: GPS to six decimal places, a camera serial that ties four "unrelated" images to one body, a document author who is a real employee, a template path containing a corporate share name. Two things beginners get wrong. Absent metadata is not suspicious — it is the normal state of anything that passed through a social platform. And present metadata is not proof: every tag is a **claim written by whatever software touched the file last**, and all of it is editable with one command. ## Where to look first, given what you have | You have | Reach for | Because | |---|---|---| | A photo downloaded from a social platform | Expect nothing | Delivery pipelines re-encode. Use `find-the-original-image` to reach an un-stripped upstream copy. | | A photo from a forum, CMS, or direct file link | Full exiftool dump | These serve your bytes back. GPS survives here more often than people expect. | | A messaging attachment | Full dump, and note how it was sent | Sent-as-photo is usually re-encoded; sent-as-file usually is not. | | A folder from one source | `exiftool -r -csv` triage | You want the outlier, and the tags shared across files. | | A DOCX/XLSX/PPTX | exiftool, then unzip the container | Tracked changes, comment authors, revision identifiers and embedded images with intact EXIF are not surfaced by exiftool. | | A PDF | exiftool, then a structural parser | Producer strings, incremental revisions, embedded files and images with their own metadata. | | A press or agency photo | IPTC and XMP blocks specifically | Newsroom workflows write caption, credit, named persons and location there, and it often survives when EXIF does not. | | A RAW or HEIC straight off a device | Full dump including MakerNotes | The richest case: serials, shutter counts, lens data, sub-second timing. | | A video | exiftool plus `ffprobe` | Container creation time, encoder string, per-track metadata, embedded GPS tracks. | ## exiftool, properly ```bash exiftool -G1 -a -u -g1 file.jpg # everything, grouped into sections — best for reading exiftool -G -a -u -s file.jpg # everything, one line per tag, real tag names exiftool -time:all -G1 -a -s file.jpg # every timestamp anywhere in the file exiftool -gps:all -n file.jpg # GPS as raw signed decimals, ready to paste into a map ``` Why the defaults lose evidence: - **`-G` / `-G1`** prefixes each tag with its group (`[EXIF]`, `[XMP]`, `[IPTC]`, `[MakerNotes]`, `[File]`, `[Composite]`). Without it you cannot distinguish a tag the device wrote from a `Composite` value exiftool calculated, or an EXIF timestamp from a filesystem one. `-G1` gives the finer group. - **`-a`** keeps duplicate tags instead of showing only the last. Inconsistencies live here: the same timestamp with two different values in two blocks means two programs disagreed, which means the file was edited. - **`-u`** shows tags exiftool has no name for. Vendor blocks are often the point. - **`-n`** disables pretty-printing — signed decimal degrees instead of `52 deg 22' 8.40" N`. - **`-s`** prints tag names rather than descriptions, so you can query them again. - **`-ee`** extracts embedded data, including GPS tracks inside video streams. Bulk triage, then sort the CSV looking for which files carry GPS at all, a recurring `SerialNumber`, timestamps outside the claimed window, and the one file whose `Software` differs: ```bash exiftool -r -csv -filename -createdate -datetimeoriginal -modifydate \ -make -model -serialnumber -gpslatitude -gpslongitude -software DIR > triage.csv exiftool -r -if '$gpslatitude' -p '$directory/$filename $gpsposition' DIR ``` Full command patterns: [reference/exiftool-cookbook.md](reference/exiftool-cookbook.md). ## Reading the high-value fields **GPS.** Position comes from `GPSLatitude`/`GPSLongitude` and their `Ref` tags, height from `GPSAltitude` plus `GPSAltitudeRef`. The forgotten ones matter more: `GPSImgDirection` is the compass bearing the **camera was pointed**, which places the photographer *and* orients the view — decisive when matching street-level imagery. `GPSDestBearing` is the bearing to the subject. `GPSHPositioningError` is the device's own accuracy estimate in metres and is the honest radius for your finding. `GPSDateStamp`/`GPSTimeStamp` are UTC, making them the only trustworthy clock in the file. **Device fingerprint.** `Make` and `Model` give a device type. `SerialNumber`, `BodySerialNumber`, `InternalSerialNumber` or `CameraSerialNumber` identify **one physical body** — the highest-value tag in the file for link analysis, tying images across accounts, platforms and years to a single camera. `LensSerialNumber` does the same for glass, and a body/lens pair is tighter still. Vendor shutter-count and image-number tags let you order a device's output and estimate how much shooting happened between two frames. `OwnerName`, `CameraOwnerName` and `Artist` are user-set and frequently hold a real name. **Timestamps.** `DateTimeOriginal` is when the shutter fired. `CreateDate` is when this digital file was created — identical on a camera, different on a scan, export or re-encode. `ModifyDate` is when it was last written; later than `DateTimeOriginal` means processing. The trap: **EXIF datetimes carry no timezone.** They are local device time unless `OffsetTime`, `OffsetTimeOriginal` or `OffsetTimeDigitized` is present, which many devices omit. So reconcile against the UTC `GPSDateTime` to derive the device's offset — which itself tells you what longitude band the device was set for. Never quote `FileModifyDate` as evidence about a photograph; it belongs to the filesystem you are looking at and changes on copy. **Thumbnail versus image.** Sloppy editors update the main image and leave the embedded preview alone, so the preview can show the scene *before* the crop or retouch. ```bash exiftool -b -ThumbnailImage file.jpg > thumb.jpg exiftool -b -PreviewImage file.jpg > preview.jpg exiftool -ee -b -JpgFromRaw file.cr2 > embedded.jpg ``` A different aspect ratio proves a crop. Different content is the whole case. **Editing chain.** `Software`, `ProcessingSoftware`, `HostComputer` and XMP's `CreatorTool` name what touched the file. XMP media-management tags go further: `DocumentID`, `OriginalDocumentID`, `InstanceID` and `DerivedFrom` link an exported derivative back to a source file you have never seen, and to sibling derivatives of that same source. **IPTC/XMP on press images.** `By-line`, `Credit`, `Source`, `Caption-Abstract`, `Headline`, `DateCreated`, `City`, `Country-PrimaryLocationName`, plus XMP's person-in-image and location-created structures. On a wire photo this is a complete human-written answer to who, where and when — written by an editor, so treat it as a sourced claim, not a sensor reading. **Documents.** `Author` and `LastModifiedBy` are the two names. `Company` and `Manager` come from the Office install. `Template` can contain a full UNC path exposing an internal server and department. `RevisionNumber` and `TotalEditTime` show whether a document was worked on or produced in one pass to look official. `LastPrinted` proves a physical copy existed. Then open the container, because per-author identities in tracked changes are not exposed by exiftool: ```bash unzip -o report.docx -d report_x # docProps/core.xml, docProps/app.xml — properties # word/document.xml — w:ins / w:del carry w:author and w:date # word/comments.xml — comment authors and initials # word/settings.xml — revision identifiers, a document-lineage fingerprint # word/media/ — embedded images, each with its own intact EXIF # word/_rels/, xl/externalLinks/ — links to internal paths and other documents ``` Embedded images are the most-missed source of GPS in practice: the document was scrubbed, the photograph pasted into page four was not. **PDF.** `Producer` names the library or driver that wrote the file and is a strong tell — a "scanned" document produced by a word processor was never scanned. `Creator` names the authoring application. PDF dates, unlike EXIF, do carry a timezone offset. PDFs support incremental updates, so earlier revisions of the content can still be inside the file, and they can carry attachments and images retaining their own metadata. Enumerate with `pdfimages -list` and `pdfdetach -list`, and expand the structure with `qpdf --qdf` before reading it. Per-format tag catalogue: [reference/tag-catalogue.md](reference/tag-catalogue.md). ## Where this goes wrong - **Stripping happens on the way in.** The mechanism: a host that *re-encodes* to generate delivery renditions discards EXIF; a host that serves your original bytes keeps it. Large social platforms re-encode. Many forums, self-hosted CMSes, object-storage buckets, photo-community sites and mail attachments do not. CMSes are the interesting middle case — the resized image on the page is stripped while the original upload in the media directory is intact, so try to reach the original path. - **Absence proves nothing.** Not that a file was scrubbed, not that it is fake, not that the uploader was careful. Write "no EXIF present", never "EXIF removed", unless you can show a copy that had it. - **Presence proves only that someone wrote a value.** Corroborate location visually with `geolocate-from-pixels` and timing with sun position before relying on either. - **The clock is probably wrong.** Camera clocks drift, stay on the wrong timezone after travel, and ignore DST. A bare EXIF datetime is ±hours until anchored against `GPSDateTime` or a dated event visible in frame. - **Composite tags are exiftool's arithmetic, not the file's content.** `GPSPosition`, `ImageSize` and `LensID` are derived. Without `-G` you will quote a calculated value as though the device wrote it. - **Screenshots carry the screenshotting device's metadata**, not the photograph's. Check whether `Model` is a phone before building a theory on it. - **Editing before extracting is unrecoverable.** Rotating, cropping, or even opening in some editors rewrites tags. Hash and copy first. - **Online metadata viewers mean uploading your evidence to a stranger.** Install exiftool; it is one Perl distribution and runs offline. A browser-local tool beats a server-side one, and neither is acceptable for material under a protective order, an NDA, or a live criminal matter. Assume anything uploaded is retained and may be indexed. ## Confidence grading - **Confirmed** — a metadata claim corroborated by non-metadata evidence: GPS that matches an independent visual geolocation of the same frame; a camera serial appearing in files from two unconnected sources; a document author matching a known employee found via `find-anyone`. - **Probable** — internally consistent metadata from a plausible device, in a file from a host that does not strip, with timestamps agreeing across EXIF, XMP and the embedded thumbnail, and no editor in the chain. - **Unconfirmed** — a single tag with nothing to check it against. Every GPS coordinate you have not visually verified sits here. That is fine, if labelled. - **Contradicted** — timestamps that disagree, a thumbnail showing a different scene, GPS the visual evidence rules out, or an editing tool the source denied using. A contradiction is a finding in its own right, often better than the original tag would have been. ## Worked example Verify a PDF "site inspection report" attached to an insurance claim, allegedly written on site on a stated date. `exiftool -G1 -a -u -g1 report.pdf`: `Producer` is a word-processor export, not a scanner driver. `CreationDate` and `ModDate` are eleven minutes apart, both with an offset three hours from the site's zone. `Author` is an initial and surname. `pdfimages -list` shows four embedded photographs. Extract them and run exiftool — nothing. They were re-encoded on insertion. Dead end, and a common one. The claim email also carried a DOCX. Unzip it: `docProps/app.xml` gives a `TotalEditTime` under four minutes and a `Template` UNC path whose hostname belongs to a third-party firm, not the insured. `word/document.xml` has tracked insertions under a second author. `word/media/image2.jpeg` still has intact EXIF — `DateTimeOriginal` two months before the claimed inspection, GPS present, `Model` a phone, `GPSHPositioningError` nine metres. Author names **probable**, to be corroborated against the firm via `x-ray-a-company`. Photo capture date **contradicted** against the report's claimed date. Photo location **unconfirmed**, handed to `geolocate-from-pixels` with a nine-metre stated radius. ## Pivots | What you got | Send to | |---|---| | GPS coordinates, camera bearing | `where-was-this-taken`, `geolocate-from-pixels` | | Author, owner, artist, comment author | `find-anyone` | | Company, template UNC path, internal share names | `x-ray-a-company`, `recon-a-domain-passively` | | Camera or lens serial linking multiple files | `graph-the-network` | | Software chain suggesting manipulation | `is-this-photo-real` | | Editing username resembling a handle | `hunt-a-handle` | | Need for an un-stripped original | `find-the-original-image`, `read-deleted-pages` | ## Legal notes Metadata in a file you lawfully hold is yours to read. Two constraints bite. Names, precise location and device identifiers in metadata are personal data under GDPR and comparable regimes whatever file they sit in, so minimisation, retention and purpose limits apply — collect the tags the objective needs, and do not keep a full dump of a subject's photo library because it was easy. And precise historical location data about an identifiable person is the most sensitive material in this skill: legitimate in due diligence, fraud and authorized investigation, and the raw material of stalking. If the only outcome of extracting a GPS tag is knowing where a private individual sleeps, stop. See [../../ETHICS.md](../../ETHICS.md).
© UseOSINT · MIT · UseOSINT/Skills