react-code-review — Claude Code skill: review React code
Reviews React components and hooks before merge: composition, hook dependencies, accessibility, TypeScript types. Findings come sorted by severity.
npx skills add giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill react-code-review -a claude-codeWhat react-code-review does
The skill walks .tsx and .jsx files, picks out component definitions, hook calls and context providers, then grades the code across several areas: component composition, hook usage, state management, performance, accessibility and TypeScript typing. React 19 patterns get their own pass — use, useOptimistic, useFormStatus, Actions.
You get a report with findings split into Critical, Warning and Suggestion, each backed by a code example. The instruction runs eight steps: scope the review, analyse architecture, check hooks, evaluate state, accessibility, performance and types, then write the report. For deeper architectural work it hands off to the react-software-architect-review agent.
It declares Read, Edit, Grep, Glob and Bash, so it needs file access in your project. Run the agent without write permissions and some steps stall. The 200-line component and 7-prop thresholds are guidance from the instruction, not a linter rule — borderline cases come back as suggestions rather than errors.
What it helps with
- catch stale closures from missing
useEffectdependencies - split a monolithic component into focused pieces
- replace manual
useEffect+useStatefetching with TanStack Query or SWR - find interactive elements that keyboard users cannot reach
- stop unstable callbacks from re-rendering child components
Example prompts for the agent
- review React code in
src/features/dashboard - check my React components before I merge this pull request
- run a React code review on the new hooks and accessibility changes
How to install react-code-review
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill react-code-review -a claude-code2Manually: put the files in place
~/.claude/skills/react-code-review/SKILL.mdCopy the whole skill folder; for one project use .claude/skills/react-code-review/
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill react-code-review -a codex2Manually: put the files in place
.agents/skills/react-code-review/SKILL.mdFor all projects use ~/.agents/skills/
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill react-code-review -a cursor2Manually: put the files in place
.cursor/skills/react-code-review/SKILL.mdCursor also reads .agents/skills/ and .claude/skills/
1GitHub CLI
gh skill install giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit react-code-review2Manually: put the files in place
.github/skills/react-code-review/SKILL.md1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill react-code-review -a gemini-cli2Platform CLI
gemini skills install https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --path plugins/developer-kit-typescript/skills/react-code-reviewManually: put the files in place
.devin/skills/react-code-review/SKILL.mdThe legacy .windsurf/skills/ path still works
Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill react-code-review -a opencodeClaude.ai
Zip the folder and upload it in Settings → Capabilities → Skills
Step by step, with commands for each platform: How to install skills in Claude Code: five ways
Questions about react-code-review
How do I install react-code-review in Claude?
Use the skills CLI: npx skills add giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill react-code-review -a claude-code. The skill file lands at ~/.claude/skills/react-code-review/SKILL.md.
What does react-code-review do?
It reviews React components and hooks for architecture, hook dependencies, React 19 patterns, state management, performance, accessibility and TypeScript typing. Output is a report grouped into Critical, Warning and Suggestion.
What tools does the skill need?
It declares Read, Edit, Grep, Glob and Bash. Without read access to your project files the review cannot run.
Source text
SKILL.md · MIT
---
name: react-code-review
description: Provides comprehensive code review capability for React applications, validates component architecture, hooks usage, React 19 patterns, state management, performance optimization, accessibility compliance, and TypeScript integration. Use when reviewing React code changes, before merging pull requests, after implementing new features, or for component architecture validation. Triggers on "review React code", "React code review", "check my React components".
allowed-tools: Read, Edit, Grep, Glob, Bash
---
# React Code Review
## Overview
This skill provides structured, comprehensive code review for React applications. It evaluates code against React 19 best practices, component architecture patterns, hook usage, accessibility standards, and production-readiness criteria. The review produces actionable findings categorized by severity (Critical, Warning, Suggestion) with concrete code examples for improvements.
This skill delegates to the `react-software-architect-review` agent for deep architectural analysis when invoked through the agent system.
## When to Use
- Reviewing React components, hooks, and pages before merging
- Validating component composition and reusability patterns
- Checking proper hook usage (useState, useEffect, useMemo, useCallback)
- Reviewing React 19 patterns (use, useOptimistic, useFormStatus, Actions)
- Evaluating state management approaches (local, context, external stores)
- Assessing performance optimization (memoization, code splitting, lazy loading)
- Reviewing accessibility compliance (WCAG, semantic HTML, ARIA)
- Validating TypeScript typing for props, state, and events
- Checking Tailwind CSS and styling patterns
- After implementing new React features or refactoring component architecture
## Instructions
1. **Identify Scope**: Determine which React components and hooks are under review. Use `glob` to discover `.tsx`/`.jsx` files and `grep` to identify component definitions, hook usage, and context providers.
2. **Analyze Component Architecture**: Verify proper component composition — check for single responsibility, appropriate size, and reusability. Look for components that are too large (>200 lines), have too many props (>7), or mix concerns.
3. **Review Hook Usage**: Validate proper hook usage — check dependency arrays in `useEffect`/`useMemo`/`useCallback`, verify cleanup functions in `useEffect`, and identify unnecessary re-renders caused by missing or incorrect memoization.
4. **Evaluate State Management**: Assess where state lives — check for proper colocation, unnecessary lifting, and appropriate use of Context vs external stores. Verify that server state uses TanStack Query, SWR, or similar libraries rather than manual `useEffect` + `useState` patterns.
5. **Check Accessibility**: Review semantic HTML usage, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, focus management, and screen reader compatibility. Verify that interactive elements are accessible and form inputs have proper labels.
6. **Assess Performance**: Look for unnecessary re-renders, missing `React.memo` on expensive components, improper use of `useCallback`/`useMemo`, missing code splitting, and large bundle imports.
7. **Review TypeScript Integration**: Check prop type definitions, event handler typing, generic component patterns, and proper use of utility types. Verify that `any` is not used where specific types are possible.
8. **Produce Review Report**: Generate a structured report with severity-classified findings (Critical, Warning, Suggestion), positive observations, and prioritized recommendations with code examples.
## Examples
### Example 1: Hook Dependency Issues
```tsx
// ❌ Bad: Missing dependency causes stale closure
function UserProfile({ userId }: { userId: string }) {
const [user, setUser] = useState<User | null>(null);
useEffect(() => {
fetchUser(userId).then(setUser);
}, []); // Missing userId in dependency array
return <div>{user?.name}</div>;
}
// ✅ Good: Proper dependencies with cleanup
function UserProfile({ userId }: { userId: string }) {
const [user, setUser] = useState<User | null>(null);
useEffect(() => {
let cancelled = false;
fetchUser(userId).then((data) => {
if (!cancelled) setUser(data);
});
return () => { cancelled = true; };
}, [userId]);
return <div>{user?.name}</div>;
}
// ✅ Better: Use TanStack Query for server state
function UserProfile({ userId }: { userId: string }) {
const { data: user, isLoading } = useQuery({
queryKey: ['user', userId],
queryFn: () => fetchUser(userId),
});
if (isLoading) return <Skeleton />;
return <div>{user?.name}</div>;
}
```
### Example 2: Component Composition
```tsx
// ❌ Bad: Monolithic component mixing data fetching, filtering, and rendering
function Dashboard() {
const [users, setUsers] = useState([]);
const [filter, setFilter] = useState('');
useEffect(() => { /* fetch + filter + sort all in one */ }, [filter]);
return <div>{/* 200+ lines of mixed concerns */}</div>;
}
// ✅ Good: Composed from focused components with custom hooks
function Dashboard() {
return (
<div>
<UserFilters />
<Suspense fallback={<TableSkeleton />}>
<UserTable />
</Suspense>
<UserPagination />
</div>
);
}
```
### Example 3: Accessibility Review
```tsx
// ❌ Bad: Inaccessible interactive elements
function Menu({ items }: { items: MenuItem[] }) {
const [open, setOpen] = useState(false);
return (
<div>
<div onClick={() => setOpen(!open)}>Menu</div>
{open && (
<div>
{items.map(item => (
<div key={item.id} onClick={() => navigate(item.path)}>
{item.label}
</div>
))}
</div>
)}
</div>
);
}
// ✅ Good: Accessible with proper semantics and keyboard support
function Menu({ items }: { items: MenuItem[] }) {
const [open, setOpen] = useState(false);
return (
<nav aria-label="Main navigation">
<button
onClick={() => setOpen(!open)}
aria-expanded={open}
aria-controls="menu-list"
>
Menu
</button>
{open && (
<ul id="menu-list" role="menu">
{items.map(item => (
<li key={item.id} role="menuitem">
<a href={item.path}>{item.label}</a>
</li>
))}
</ul>
)}
</nav>
);
}
```
### Example 4: Performance Optimization
```tsx
// ❌ Bad: Unstable callback recreated every render causes child re-renders
{filtered.map(product => (
<ProductCard
key={product.id}
product={product}
onSelect={() => console.log(product.id)} // New function each render
/>
))}
// ✅ Good: Stable callback + memoized child
const handleSelect = useCallback((id: string) => {
console.log(id);
}, []);
const filtered = useMemo(
() => products.filter(p => p.name.toLowerCase().includes(search.toLowerCase())),
[products, search]
);
{filtered.map(product => (
<ProductCard key={product.id} product={product} onSelect={handleSelect} />
))}
const ProductCard = memo(function ProductCard({ product, onSelect }: Props) {
return <div onClick={() => onSelect(product.id)}>{product.name}</div>;
});
```
### Example 5: TypeScript Props Review
```tsx
// ❌ Bad: Loose typing and missing prop definitions
function Card({ data, onClick, children, ...rest }: any) {
return (
<div onClick={onClick} {...rest}>
<h2>{data.title}</h2>
{children}
</div>
);
}
// ✅ Good: Strict typing with proper interfaces
interface CardProps extends React.ComponentPropsWithoutRef<'article'> {
title: string;
description?: string;
variant?: 'default' | 'outlined' | 'elevated';
onAction?: (event: React.MouseEvent<HTMLButtonElement>) => void;
children: React.ReactNode;
}
function Card({
title,
description,
variant = 'default',
onAction,
children,
className,
...rest
}: CardProps) {
return (
<article className={cn('card', `card--${variant}`, className)} {...rest}>
<h2>{title}</h2>
{description && <p>{description}</p>}
{children}
{onAction && <button onClick={onAction}>Action</button>}
</article>
);
}
```
## Review Output Format
Structure all code review findings as follows:
### 1. Summary
Brief overview with an overall quality score (1-10) and key observations.
### 2. Critical Issues (Must Fix)
Issues causing bugs, security vulnerabilities, or broken functionality.
### 3. Warnings (Should Fix)
Issues that violate best practices, cause performance problems, or reduce maintainability.
### 4. Suggestions (Consider Improving)
Improvements for code organization, accessibility, or developer experience.
### 5. Positive Observations
Well-implemented patterns and good practices to acknowledge.
### 6. Recommendations
Prioritized next steps with code examples for the most impactful improvements.
## Best Practices
- Keep components focused — single responsibility, under 200 lines
- Colocate state with the components that use it
- Use custom hooks to extract reusable logic from components
- Apply `React.memo` only when measured re-render cost justifies it
- Use TanStack Query or SWR for server state instead of `useEffect` + `useState`
- Always include cleanup functions in `useEffect` when subscribing to external resources
- Write semantic HTML first, add ARIA only when native semantics are insufficient
- Use TypeScript strict mode and avoid `any` in component props
- Implement error boundaries for graceful failure handling
- Prefer composition over conditional rendering complexity
## Constraints and Warnings
- Respect the project's React version — avoid suggesting React 19 features for older versions
- Do not enforce a specific state management library unless the project has standardized on one
- Memoization is not always beneficial — only suggest it when re-render impact is measurable
- Accessibility recommendations should follow WCAG 2.1 AA as the baseline
- Focus on high-confidence issues — avoid false positives on subjective style choices
- Do not suggest rewriting working components without clear, measurable benefit
## References
See the `references/` directory for detailed review checklists and pattern documentation:
- `references/hooks-patterns.md` — React hooks best practices and common mistakes
- `references/component-architecture.md` — Component composition and design patterns
- `references/accessibility.md` — Accessibility checklist and ARIA patterns for React
© giuseppe-trisciuoglio · MIT · giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit