rag-perf — Claude Code skill: benchmark an NVIDIA RAG server
Runs a profiling pass and an aiperf load test against a deployed NVIDIA RAG Blueprint server, all driven by one YAML config.
npx skills add NVIDIA/skills --skill rag-perf -a claude-codeWhat rag-perf does
This skill benchmarks a running NVIDIA RAG Blueprint server. The profiling pass reports per-stage timing, citation quality and a bottleneck guess. An optional aiperf load test adds TTFT, end-to-end latency, token and request throughput, and error rate. Everything is config-driven: the CLI takes only -c / --config, --help and --version, so field variations live in YAML.
Three presets ship with it. quick_profile.yaml skips the load test for fast iteration on retrieval and reranker tuning. single_run.yaml covers one concurrency level for regression checks. sweep.yaml turns load.concurrency, rag.vdb_top_k and rag.reranker_top_k into sweep axes — any of them as a list becomes a Cartesian product. Each run prints the fully resolved config, so you can reproduce it from terminal output alone.
Before the first run, clone the repo, install Python 3.11+ and uv, then run uv sync --project scripts/rag-perf and invoke commands from the repo root. Replace rag.collection_names: ["<collection_name>"] with a real collection: the placeholder validates, but every request fails at retrieval. Synthetic queries need an OpenAI-compatible chat-completions endpoint. This is a one-shot benchmark, not monitoring — answer-quality scoring belongs to rag-eval, and deploying or repairing services belongs to rag-blueprint.
What it helps with
- measure TTFT and end-to-end latency of a RAG server
- locate the slow stage in the request pipeline
- compare throughput across concurrency levels
- catch a regression after changing the reranker or top-k
- sweep a grid of retrieval parameters in one run
Example prompts for the agent
- run rag-perf on quick_profile.yaml and show me where the time goes
- sweep concurrency and vdb_top_k, then compute scaling efficiency
- run single_run.yaml and flag zero citations or errors
How to install rag-perf
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add NVIDIA/skills --skill rag-perf -a claude-code2Manually: put the files in place
~/.claude/skills/rag-perf/SKILL.mdCopy the whole skill folder; for one project use .claude/skills/rag-perf/
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add NVIDIA/skills --skill rag-perf -a codex2Manually: put the files in place
.agents/skills/rag-perf/SKILL.mdFor all projects use ~/.agents/skills/
1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add NVIDIA/skills --skill rag-perf -a cursor2Manually: put the files in place
.cursor/skills/rag-perf/SKILL.mdCursor also reads .agents/skills/ and .claude/skills/
1GitHub CLI
gh skill install NVIDIA/skills rag-perf2Manually: put the files in place
.github/skills/rag-perf/SKILL.md1Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add NVIDIA/skills --skill rag-perf -a gemini-cli2Platform CLI
gemini skills install https://github.com/NVIDIA/skills --path skills/rag-perfManually: put the files in place
.devin/skills/rag-perf/SKILL.mdThe legacy .windsurf/skills/ path still works
Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add NVIDIA/skills --skill rag-perf -a opencodeClaude.ai
Zip the folder and upload it in Settings → Capabilities → Skills
Step by step, with commands for each platform: How to install skills in Claude Code: five ways
Questions about rag-perf
How do I install rag-perf in Claude?
Run npx skills add NVIDIA/skills --skill rag-perf -a claude-code. The skill lands in ~/.claude/skills/rag-perf/SKILL.md.
What does rag-perf do?
It drives a deployed NVIDIA RAG Blueprint server through a profiling pass and an aiperf load test, then writes a unified report with timings, throughput and citation quality.
How is rag-perf different from rag-eval and rag-blueprint?
rag-perf measures performance. Accuracy and RAGAS scoring are handled by rag-eval, while deploying or repairing services is rag-blueprint's job.
Source text
SKILL.md · Apache-2.0
--- name: rag-perf version: "2.6.0" description: >- Performance benchmarking for a deployed NVIDIA RAG Blueprint server: profiling pass + aiperf load test driven by a single YAML config. Not for accuracy / RAGAS scoring (use rag-eval) or for deploying / repairing services (use rag-blueprint). license: Apache-2.0 compatibility: Repository checkout with uv; Python 3.11+; run from repo root; uv sync --project scripts/rag-perf (perf deps live in scripts/rag-perf/pyproject.toml); reachable RAG server (default http://localhost:8081); for synthetic queries an OpenAI-compatible chat-completions endpoint is required (default http://localhost:8999/v1/chat/completions); aiperf load-test phase uses the bundled nvidia_rag endpoint plugin, registered automatically when rag-perf is installed editable. metadata: tool-version: "0.1.0" author: NVIDIA RAG <[email protected]> github-url: "https://github.com/NVIDIA-AI-Blueprints/rag" endpoint-openapi-schemas: - docs/api_reference/openapi_schema_rag_server.json argument-hint: rag-perf | aiperf | TTFT | latency | throughput | concurrency sweep | bottleneck | retrieval / reranker tuning | profile-only | synthetic queries | quick_profile.yaml | single_run.yaml | sweep.yaml | uv run --project scripts/rag-perf tags: - nvidia - blueprint - rag - performance - benchmarking - aiperf - nvidia-rag-blueprint languages: - python - shell frameworks: - aiperf - fastapi domain: ai-ml allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob Bash(ls *) Bash(python3 *) Bash(uv *) Bash(cat *) Bash(curl *) Write Edit --- # RAG-Perf — config-driven perf benchmark CLI ## Purpose Drive a deployed NVIDIA RAG Blueprint server with a YAML config, run a server-side **profiling pass** (per-stage timing, citation quality, bottleneck inference) and an optional **aiperf load test** (TTFT / E2E / token & request throughput / error rate), and write a unified report. The CLI is intentionally minimal: `rag-perf -c <config>` plus `--help` / `--version`. Behaviour is *fully* config-driven; field variations belong in YAML. ## Scope - **Accuracy / RAGAS** scoring of answer quality → use the **rag-eval** skill. - **Deploying, repairing, or configuring services** (compose, helm, NIM env vars) → use the **rag-blueprint** skill. - **Production monitoring / alerting** — rag-perf is a one-shot benchmark tool. - **Runtime requirement:** a deployed RAG server reachable on the network. ## Prerequisites - Repo cloned; **run commands from the repo root** (config paths in the presets are repo-root-relative). - Python **3.11+** and **uv** on PATH. - Install rag-perf into its own uv-managed venv: `uv sync --project scripts/rag-perf`. - For unit tests: install dev extras as well — `uv sync --project scripts/rag-perf --extra dev` (otherwise `pytest-asyncio` is missing and async tests error out at collection time). - A reachable RAG server (default `http://localhost:8081`). For the aiperf phase, the bundled `nvidia_rag` endpoint plugin must be installed — `pip install -e ./scripts/rag-perf` registers it via the `aiperf.plugins` entry point. - For **synthetic** queries: an OpenAI-compatible chat-completions endpoint reachable at `synthetic.llm_url` (default `http://localhost:8999/v1/chat/completions`). - rag-perf itself runs without `NVIDIA_API_KEY` (unlike rag-eval). The synthetic LLM endpoint may require its own auth — that's the deployment's concern. ## Instructions 1. **Pick a preset.** The three under [`scripts/rag-perf/configs/`](../../scripts/rag-perf/configs) are: - `quick_profile.yaml` — profile-only, ~30 s. Skips load test. For fast iteration on retrieval / reranker tuning. - `single_run.yaml` — one concurrency level, profiling + aiperf, ~2 min. Regression checks. - `sweep.yaml` — multi-axis sweep. `load.concurrency`, `rag.vdb_top_k`, `rag.reranker_top_k` are all `int | list[int]`; any of them as a list becomes a sweep axis (Cartesian product). 2. **Edit the preset.** **Required:** replace `rag.collection_names: ["<collection_name>"]` with a real collection on the deployed ingestor server. Verify the collection exists via `GET /v1/collections` on the ingestor. The placeholder `<collection_name>` validates fine but every request will fail at retrieval. Use a copied YAML preset for variants; the CLI surface is intentionally config-only. 3. **Run.** From repo root: ```bash uv run --project scripts/rag-perf rag-perf -c scripts/rag-perf/configs/single_run.yaml ``` Same form for the other presets. The CLI accepts only `-c / --config` (required), `--help`, `--version`. 4. **Read stdout.** Every invocation prints, in order: a startup banner, a one-line summary, the **fully resolved config as YAML** (so the run is reproducible from terminal output), per-grid-point progress with the **shlex-joined aiperf command** in copy-pastable form, a **rich per-point summary table** (stage breakdown with bars, citation quality, bottleneck, load-test block), and finally a **side-by-side comparison table** auto-labelled by whichever axis varied. See [`references/output-and-analysis.md`](references/output-and-analysis.md). 5. **Inspect artifacts.** Layout depends on run shape — flat for single-point + `iterations=1`, nested under `iter_<i>/<point>/...` otherwise. See [`references/output-and-analysis.md`](references/output-and-analysis.md) for the full directory tree, file purposes, and how to parse `results.json` / `results.csv` / `report.md`. 6. **Summarise for the user.** When reporting back, follow the playbook in [`references/output-and-analysis.md#summarising-results-to-the-user`](references/output-and-analysis.md#summarising-results-to-the-user): pick the canonical result file for the run shape, build a headline table (concurrency × top-k axes × TTFT × throughput × bottleneck × citation quality), compute scaling efficiency on sweeps, **always flag** zero citations / non-zero error rate / suspect `llm_ttft_ms` / small-sample p99, and propose a concrete next-experiment YAML. 7. **Tune.** Schema is fully documented in [`docs/performance-benchmarking.md`](../../docs/performance-benchmarking.md) and the deeper-dive references below. Common knobs: turn `aiperf.enabled: false` for profile-only mode, increase `load.iterations` for variance estimation, set `load.sleep_between_points_s: 60` for overnight Cartesian sweeps. ## Examples **Profile-only (quickest signal on retrieval / reranker tuning):** ```bash uv run --project scripts/rag-perf rag-perf -c scripts/rag-perf/configs/quick_profile.yaml ``` Output: `rag-perf-results/quick_profile/run_<ts>/{profile_report.md, profile_results.json, profiling/}`. The `aiperf_rag_on/` directory is omitted. Filenames are `profile_*` because `aiperf.enabled: false`. **Single benchmark point with full report:** ```bash uv run --project scripts/rag-perf rag-perf -c scripts/rag-perf/configs/single_run.yaml ``` Output: flat `run_<ts>/{report.md, results.json, results.csv, profiling/, aiperf_rag_on/}`. **Concurrency sweep:** ```bash uv run --project scripts/rag-perf rag-perf -c scripts/rag-perf/configs/sweep.yaml ``` Output: nested `run_<ts>/iter_1/<CR:_VDB-K:_RERANKER-K:_…>/{profiling,aiperf_rag_on}/` per point, plus aggregate `report.md` / `results.json` / `results.csv` at the run root. **Run unit tests:** ```bash uv sync --project scripts/rag-perf --extra dev # one-time, installs pytest-asyncio uv run --project scripts/rag-perf python -m pytest tests/unit/test_rag_perf/ ``` ## Limitations - The CLI is **config-only**: author or copy YAML to vary a parameter. - `load.concurrency` / `rag.vdb_top_k` / `rag.reranker_top_k` accept `int | list[int]`; the validator requires unique list values because each value names a unique point dir. - `input.file` and `input.synthetic` follow an XOR rule — both set fails validation. When neither is set, `synthetic` auto-fills with defaults so a bare config still validates. - File-based input format is **inferred from extension only** (`.jsonl` or `.csv`); other extensions are rejected. - Synthetic generation streams each query to disk as it completes (failure-resilient) but **fails fast on the first LLM error** — partial JSONL is preserved. Re-run after fixing the endpoint. - Reasoning models (Nemotron Omni, Qwen-Reasoning) require `synthetic.disable_thinking: true` (the default). Without it the model exhausts the token budget on chain-of-thought and `content` returns empty — the generator now raises with a clear message instead of substituting `reasoning_content` for the answer. - aiperf-specific knobs outside the YAML surface (request rate distribution, GPU telemetry config, etc.) require editing `AiperfRunner._base_aiperf_cmd` in `scripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/runner.py`. - Procedural detail lives under **`references/`** to keep this file concise. ## Troubleshooting | Error / signal | Likely cause | What to do | |---|---|---| | `Configuration errors in <yaml>: • input — ... XOR rule` | Both `input.file` and `input.synthetic` set | Pick one. The XOR validator runs at YAML load time. | | `input.file must end in .jsonl or .csv` | Extension other than `.jsonl` / `.csv` | Rename or convert. | | `load.concurrency has duplicate values` | e.g. `[2, 2, 4]` | Each concurrency maps to a unique point dir; dedupe. | | `warmup_requests must be >= 1` | YAML had `warmup_requests: 0` | aiperf rejects warmup=0; minimum is 1. | | `LLM returned empty content (reasoning_content was populated — model exhausted its budget on chain-of-thought; raise min_query_tokens or set synthetic.disable_thinking=true).` | Reasoning model used CoT and ran out of tokens | Set `synthetic.disable_thinking: true` (the default) or raise `min_query_tokens`. | | `✗ All N profiling requests failed across M point(s).` + exit 1 | Bad URL, server down, wrong collection | Verify `target.url`, `rag.collection_names` (the `<collection_name>` placeholder will hit this). | | Per-iteration `⚠ N profiling requests failed` warning, run continues | Some requests timed out / errored mid-run | Check rag-server logs, raise `target.timeout_s`, drop concurrency. | | `RuntimeError: Random synthetic query generation failed at query N: ...` | LLM endpoint rejected a request mid-generation | Partial JSONL is at `synthetic.jsonl_output_path`; fix endpoint and re-run with reduced `num_queries`, or point `input.file` at the partial file. | | `Citation count (mean): 0` and `Citation relevance score: N/A` for a non-empty deployment | Collection mismatch between `rag.collection_names` and what's actually ingested | Run `curl -s http://<ingestor>:8082/v1/collections` to list real collections. | | Tests error with `ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pytest_asyncio'` | Dev extras missing | `uv sync --project scripts/rag-perf --extra dev`. | | CI: `ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'ruamel'` from `tests/unit/test_rag_perf/` | rag-perf package missing from CI venv | Add `uv pip install -e ./scripts/rag-perf` after the top-level install in the unit-tests job. | ## Gotchas - **Run from repo root.** Preset configs reference `scripts/rag-perf/examples/queries.jsonl` and `scripts/rag-perf/prompts/default_prompts.yaml` with repo-root-relative paths. Running from inside `scripts/rag-perf/` will fail those file lookups. - **CLI is config-only.** Edit the YAML or copy a preset for URL, concurrency, collection, and similar fields. - **Always edit `rag.collection_names` before the first run.** The presets ship with `["<collection_name>"]` as a deliberate placeholder. Validation passes, retrieval fails silently for every request — manifests as `Citation count (mean): 0` everywhere. - **`load.concurrency_list`, `rag.vdb_top_k_list`, `rag.reranker_top_k_list`** are read-only properties that normalise scalar-or-list to a list. Use them when reasoning about the grid; the underlying YAML field is whatever the user wrote. - **`aiperf.enabled: false` changes filenames.** The top-level outputs become `profile_report.md` / `profile_results.json` / `profile_results.csv`. The aggregate sweep table also suppresses load-test rows and the "Optimal throughput" footer. - **Resolved-config dump is verbose** (50+ lines) — expected. It's what makes terminal output a self-contained reproducer; don't filter it out in scripts. - **The aiperf shell command is logged before each subprocess.** Look for `\n $ python -m aiperf profile -m ... --endpoint-type nvidia_rag ...` in stdout — copy-paste runnable for reproducing a single point outside rag-perf. - **`--endpoint-type nvidia_rag`** comes from the bundled plugin at `scripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/plugin/nvidia_rag.py`. It teaches aiperf about the RAG `/v1/generate` request shape and parses citations + per-stage `metrics` out of the SSE stream. If aiperf can't resolve `nvidia_rag`, rag-perf needs editable installation in the venv — re-run `uv sync --project scripts/rag-perf` (or `uv pip install -e ./scripts/rag-perf`). - **Sweep-mode point-name collision.** When two points differ only in concurrency (e.g. `[1, 4]` × single `vdb_top_k`), the dir name encodes everything: `CR:1_ISL:50_OSL:512_VDB-K:20_RERANKER-K:4_Model:...`. Cluster / GPU / experiment_name (`output.cluster`, `output.gpu`, `output.experiment_name`) are appended too — useful for diff-friendly artifact paths across machines. - **`load.iterations > 1` repeats the entire grid**. Each repetition writes to its own `iter_<i>/`. Aggregate CSV row count = `n_points × iterations`. ## Source of truth | Piece | Location | |---|---| | Driver | [`scripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/cli.py`](../../scripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/cli.py) (`main` is the single Click command) | | Schema | [`scripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/config.py`](../../scripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/config.py) (`RunConfig` and sub-models) | | Orchestrator | [`scripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/runner.py`](../../scripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/runner.py) (`BenchmarkRunner.run`, `RagProfiler`, `AiperfRunner`) | | aiperf plugin | [`scripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/plugin/nvidia_rag.py`](../../scripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/plugin/nvidia_rag.py) | | User-facing doc | [`docs/performance-benchmarking.md`](../../docs/performance-benchmarking.md) | | Presets | [`scripts/rag-perf/configs/{quick_profile,single_run,sweep}.yaml`](../../scripts/rag-perf/configs/) | | Sample queries | [`scripts/rag-perf/examples/queries.jsonl`](../../scripts/rag-perf/examples/queries.jsonl) | | Synthetic prompts | [`scripts/rag-perf/prompts/default_prompts.yaml`](../../scripts/rag-perf/prompts/default_prompts.yaml) | | Config schema details | [`references/config-schema.md`](references/config-schema.md) | | Synthetic-query generation | [`references/synthetic-generation.md`](references/synthetic-generation.md) | | Output layout & metric semantics | [`references/output-and-analysis.md`](references/output-and-analysis.md) | ## Agent playbook 1. **Sync deps:** `uv sync --project scripts/rag-perf` (one-time per checkout). 2. **Pick & customise a preset:** copy `scripts/rag-perf/configs/<preset>.yaml` if you want a variant; always set `rag.collection_names` to a real collection. 3. **Run:** `uv run --project scripts/rag-perf rag-perf -c <config>` from repo root. 4. **Read the per-point + aggregate tables on stdout.** Bottleneck inference is in the per-point profiling section; comparison across points is the final aggregate table. 5. **Parse artifacts** under `output.dir/run_<ts>/` — see [`references/output-and-analysis.md`](references/output-and-analysis.md). For multi-point runs, `results.csv` has one row per (point × iteration). 6. **Summarise for the user** using the playbook in [`references/output-and-analysis.md#summarising-results-to-the-user`](references/output-and-analysis.md#summarising-results-to-the-user) — headline table, scaling-efficiency math for sweeps, mandatory flags for zero citations / non-zero errors / suspect `llm_ttft_ms` / low sample size, and a concrete next-experiment YAML. 7. **Tune retrieval / reranker:** flip to `quick_profile.yaml` or `aiperf.enabled: false` for fast iteration, then return to `single_run.yaml` / `sweep.yaml` when characterising under load. 8. **Triage failures:** see Troubleshooting above and [`references/output-and-analysis.md`](references/output-and-analysis.md) for empty-citation / bottleneck=N/A patterns.
© NVIDIA RAG · Apache-2.0 · NVIDIA/skills