Skip to main content
skill CX Codex

goal-framing — Claude Code skill: purpose and installation

This skill defines a task goal, evidence of success, and boundaries before work begins. Use it when the agent needs a clear stop condition and a route for the task.

Install into Claude Code · Skills CLI (Vercel) All methods and platforms ↓
npx skills add GanyuanRan/Aegis --skill goal-framing -a claude-code
Open on GitHub

What goal-framing does

When asked to frame a goal, the skill creates a compact task outline with the intended outcome, success evidence, stop condition, constraints, and scope. It then selects a workflow, such as debugging for a reported failure or planning for approved requirements, and continues in the same turn. If the user wants framing only, or essential information is missing, it stops at that point.

The skill is opt-in: it responds to /aegis-goal, Aegis goal:, or a direct request to define the goal or boundaries before starting. It does not activate for routine questions or tiny edits unless requested. It does not make authoritative gate decisions or enforce an automatic stop. When work is delegated, it prepares a concise context packet; goal framing alone does not create project files.

What it helps with

  • set success evidence and a stop condition before implementation
  • define task boundaries before work starts
  • route a bug report to a debugging workflow
  • give a subagent focused context instead of the full conversation

Example prompts for the agent

  • Before you start, set the goal and stop condition for fixing the auth refresh bug without rewriting the auth system: /aegis-goal fix the auth refresh bug without rewriting the auth system.
  • Define the goal, success evidence, and task boundaries, but do not execute the work yet.
  • Frame this bug investigation, then continue with the appropriate debugging workflow.

How to install goal-framing

1Skills CLI (Vercel)

npx skills add GanyuanRan/Aegis --skill goal-framing -a claude-code

2Manually: put the files in place

~/.claude/skills/goal-framing/SKILL.md

Copy the whole skill folder; for one project use .claude/skills/goal-framing/

Step by step, with commands for each platform: How to install skills in Claude Code: five ways

Questions about goal-framing

How do I install goal-framing in Claude Code?

Run npx skills add GanyuanRan/Aegis --skill goal-framing -a claude-code. The skill file is at ~/.claude/skills/goal-framing/SKILL.md.

What does goal-framing do?

It drafts a short task frame covering the goal, success evidence, stop condition, and scope, then routes work to a suitable workflow.

Does goal-framing run automatically for small edits?

No. It requires an explicit /aegis-goal request, an Aegis goal: prompt, or a direct request to define the goal or boundaries.

Source text

SKILL.md · MIT
---
name: goal-framing
description: "Use when the user explicitly sets an Aegis goal with /aegis-goal, Aegis goal:, or asks to define goal, success evidence, stop condition, or task boundaries before work."
---

# Aegis Goal Framing

Use this skill to create a thin goal frame before execution. It is opt-in and
boundary-setting only.

Do not use it for tiny edits, one-command checks, or ordinary fast-path Q&A
unless the user explicitly asks for `/aegis-goal` or `Aegis goal:`.

## Authority Boundary

Current owner:

- Method Pack task framing

Not owned here:

- authoritative `GateDecision`
- final evidence sufficiency
- final completion authority is not owned here
- host daemon / automatic stop enforcement

## Input Forms

Treat these as equivalent:

- `/aegis-goal <task description>`
- `Aegis goal: <task description>`
- "Define the goal / stop condition before we start"

Slash commands are optional host shortcuts. The natural-language form is the
portable fallback.

Example:

```text
Aegis goal: Fix the auth refresh bug without rewriting the auth system.
```

## Output

Produce the smallest useful frame, then continue into the routed workflow in
the same turn.

```text
TaskIntentDraft:
- Requested outcome:
- Goal:
- Success evidence:
- Stop condition:
- Non-goals:
- Constraints:
- Scope:
- Risk hints:
- Aegis Visibility:
- Route:
- Next:
```

Default behavior:

- Do not stop after `TaskIntentDraft`.
- Treat the frame as the start protocol for execution, not as the final answer.
- After the compact frame, immediately take the `Next` action for the selected
  route when the user asked to do the work.
- Keep the visible frame natural and short when the goal is clear; do not emit a
  large internal-looking card unless the user asked for a formal frame.
- Use `Aegis Visibility` to say why the goal frame constrains the route, stop
  condition, or non-goals. Do not add trace ceremony unless the user explicitly
  asks for auditability.

Frame-only behavior:

- Stop at the frame only when the user explicitly asks to only define the goal,
  only define the stop condition, not execute, not implement, not write a plan,
  or wait for confirmation before continuing.
- If required information is missing, state the missing input and stop with
  `blocked` rather than pretending to continue.

Stop condition must distinguish:

State set: `done`, `blocked`, `needs-verification`, `scope-exceeded`.

- `done`: success evidence is satisfied
- `blocked`: required dependency, permission, or information is missing
- `needs-verification`: implementation exists but evidence is insufficient
- `scope-exceeded`: continuing would exceed the goal or non-goals

## Routing

After framing:

- Low-risk single-owner work continues through the normal fast path or TDD
- Ambiguous product / architecture / contract work routes to `brainstorming`
- Approved requirements route to `writing-plans`
- Multi-step, compaction-prone, handoff, or subagent work routes to
  `long-task-continuation`
- Bug diagnosis routes to `systematic-debugging`

### Route Matrix

| Goal signal | Route |
| --- | --- |
| single-owner, low-risk, clear verification | fast path or `test-driven-development` |
| bug, failure, regression, unexpected behavior | `systematic-debugging` |
| ambiguous product, architecture, contract, cross-module behavior | `brainstorming` |
| approved spec, stable requirements, implementation slicing | `writing-plans` |
| multi-step, compaction-prone, handoff, subagent work | `long-task-continuation` |
| completion, release, handoff, "is this done?" | `verification-before-completion` |

Only create `docs/aegis/` records when the routed workflow needs persistent
evidence. Goal framing alone does not create project files.

## Subagent Context Packet

When delegating work, pass a compact packet instead of the full conversation:

```text
SubagentContextPacket:
- Task:
- Goal:
- Stop condition:
- Relevant baseline refs:
- Relevant files:
- Known facts:
- Unknowns:
- Non-goals:
- Expected output:
- Verification expected:
- Must-read excerpts:
- Unsafe assumptions:
```

The packet reduces repeated file reading, but it does not replace evidence.
Subagents should still read the smallest raw file/log/test excerpt needed to
verify critical facts.

Do not paste full chat transcripts, full session history, or unbounded logs into
the packet. If a fact matters, include a file ref, line/window hint, or compact
must-read excerpt.

## Drift Rule

If the goal changes mid-task, do not silently overwrite it. Record old goal,
new goal, changed scope, new risks, and route through `DriftCheckDraft` when a
long-task record exists.

© GanyuanRan · MIT · GanyuanRan/Aegis

Similar skills

All skills for Agent setup: memory, context, orchestration →

From the same set11

ui-ux-governance A skill that gives the agent rules for interface work: how to pick flows, handle states and keep accessibility intact. CX Codex +1 ★ 1,388repo stars systematic-debugging This skill guides bug and test-failure investigations before code changes. Use it to trace a symptom to the logic that owns the cause. CX Codex +1 ★ 1,388repo stars subagent-driven-development Runs a written implementation plan by dispatching a fresh subagent for each task, then reviewing it twice: spec compliance first, code quality second. CX Codex +1 ★ 1,388repo stars recording-architecture-decisions This skill decides when an architecture decision belongs in an ADR and checks whether the current-state baseline still matches the change. CX Codex +1 ★ 1,388repo stars first-principles-review A short first-principles and Occam's-razor pass before your agent locks in a direction. Ordinary bug fixes skip it. CX Codex +1 ★ 1,388repo stars establishing-project-context Keeps domain terms in CONTEXT.md so people and agents call the same things by the same names. Useful when a term gets renamed, deprecated or overloaded. CX Codex +1 ★ 1,388repo stars communicating-concisely This skill makes agent replies more compact when asked, while preserving technical details. The style stays active until the user turns it off. CX Codex +1 ★ 1,388repo stars brainstorming A skill for Claude and other agents that turns a rough idea into an approved spec and blocks implementation until the design is signed off. CX Codex +1 ★ 1,388repo stars

Project sponsors

Companies that keep this analytics open
Gold sponsor

Impressions, clicks and code copies — open statistics. We keep the numbers public for the same reason NeBlask itself is public. Become a sponsor