Skip to main content
skill CX Codex

ce-dogfood — Claude Code skill for branch QA and installation

This skill tests the active branch’s changes in a real browser, fixes small breakages, and records the results. Run it to check changed user flows before merging.

Install into Claude Code · Skills CLI (Vercel) All methods and platforms ↓
npx skills add EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin --skill ce-dogfood -a claude-code
Open on GitHub

What ce-dogfood does

ce-dogfood compares the active branch with trunk, maps the affected user flows, and exercises them in a real browser. Its scope is the branch diff, not the whole application. It judges each flow for correctness and against product personas, then can fix small, clear breakages with regression tests and commits.

You need a local development server and the agent-browser CLI. The skill uses that CLI alone to control the browser and reads references/phases.md before starting. It writes a report from the supplied template under dogfood-reports/ and runs the project’s automated test suite once. A failed suite means the final verdict is not ready, even if the browser scenarios pass.

Invocation is manual. The skill won’t switch the primary checkout without confirmation when uncommitted changes could be disturbed. Architectural choices and product changes with competing solutions are left for a human to decide, rather than being made just to pass a scenario.

What it helps with

  • exercise browser flows affected by a branch diff
  • spot small breakages in user-facing changes
  • verify a fix with a regression test
  • record scenario results in a dogfood report

Example prompts for the agent

  • Run /ce-dogfood to test the current branch.
  • Check the changes in PR 42 with /ce-dogfood 42.
  • Test feature/login using the local server: /ce-dogfood feature/login --port 3000.

How to install ce-dogfood

1Skills CLI (Vercel)

npx skills add EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin --skill ce-dogfood -a claude-code

2Manually: put the files in place

~/.claude/skills/ce-dogfood/SKILL.md

Copy the whole skill folder; for one project use .claude/skills/ce-dogfood/

Step by step, with commands for each platform: How to install skills in Claude Code: five ways

Questions about ce-dogfood

How do I install ce-dogfood in Claude Code?

Run npx skills add EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin --skill ce-dogfood -a claude-code. The skill is installed at ~/.claude/skills/ce-dogfood/SKILL.md.

What does the ce-dogfood skill do?

It tests browser flows affected by the current branch and saves a report. Small, well-understood breakages can be fixed with regression tests and commits.

What does ce-dogfood need to run?

You need a local development server and the agent-browser CLI. Browser control goes through that CLI.

Source text

SKILL.md · MIT
---
name: ce-dogfood
description: "Hands-off, diff-scoped browser QA of the active branch: maps user flows, drives a real browser, autonomously fixes small breakages with regression tests and commits, judges experience against product personas, and writes a durable dogfood report. Manual invocation only."
disable-model-invocation: true
argument-hint: "[PR number, branch name, or blank for current branch] [--port PORT]"
---

# Dogfood

Act as a QA engineer who dogfoods the **active branch** end-to-end, autonomously, until it is genuinely ready.

**Outcome:** every user-visible change this branch introduced has been driven in a real browser along its whole journey, judged for correctness and for how it feels to the product's personas, with small breakages fixed, regression-tested, and committed. **Done:** every matrix scenario is `Pass`, `Fixed`, `Skipped`, or in a terminal `Blocked` state; the project's automated suite has been run once and its result recorded; and the report at `<root>/dogfood-reports/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<branch-slug>-dogfood.md` is finalized against its template and committed. A green matrix over a red suite finalizes as a not-ready verdict rather than a ready one. Chasing that suite green is not this run's job.

This is **diff-scoped**, not whole-app exploration. You test what *this branch* introduced or modified versus the trunk.

**Read `references/phases.md` before Phase 0 (Scope) and follow it.** It defines every phase in detail; the run cannot be executed correctly from the phase list below.

## Boundaries

- Drive the browser exclusively through the `agent-browser` CLI — never Chrome MCP tools (`mcp__claude-in-chrome__*`), another browser MCP, or a built-in browser-control tool, even when the platform offers one. Use the direct binary, never `npx agent-browser` (the direct binary uses the fast Rust client).
- Never dogfood the trunk on a branch-name or blank target — there is no diff. A PR target always has a base, so it is always diffable even when its head branch is named `main`.
- A numeric target stays a PR identity through isolation and checkout — never collapse it to its head ref, whose name may itself be `main`.
- Never switch the primary checkout out from under the user. This skill decides only whether to offer isolation — no for a blank or current-branch target (you are already on it), yes for a PR or another named ref — and `ce-worktree` handles the mechanics and reports the verdict. On a declined offer, check the target out in place, confirming first if uncommitted changes would be disturbed.
- Screenshots and other transient artifacts go to OS temp (`mktemp -d "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/ce-dogfood-XXXXXX"`), never the repo root; copy one in only to embed it in the report.
- Auto-fix only what is small, well-understood, and low-risk. A change that needs an architectural or schema decision, alters product behavior or UX intent, spans many files, or has plausible competing solutions is escalated to the report's **Decisions for a human** section, never implemented to clear a matrix item.

## Prerequisites

**User-runnable invocation rendering.** In prerequisite failures, default to `/ce-setup` and `/ce-dogfood <original arguments>`; use `$ce-setup` and `$ce-dogfood <original arguments>` only when the active host is Codex or explicitly documents dollar-prefixed skill invocation. On oh-my-pi (`omp`), use `/skill:ce-setup` and `/skill:ce-dogfood <original arguments>`. Render only each invocation as inline code and output one form only.

- A local dev server you can start (`bin/dev`, `rails server`, `npm run dev`, etc.).
- `agent-browser` installed. Check:

  ```bash
  command -v agent-browser >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "Ready" || echo "NOT INSTALLED"
  ```

  If not installed, stop and tell the user to install `agent-browser`: print the rendered `ce-setup` invocation for the current install command, followed by the rendered `ce-dogfood <original arguments>` invocation to retry. This workflow cannot function without it.

## Artifact Root

Reports live under `<root>/dogfood-reports/` and personas under `<root>/personas/`. Resolve `<root>` the first time you compose any `<root>/` path, whether you are reading or writing, and never before. A run that composes none skips it.

<!-- ce-docs-root:start -->
**Resolve the CE artifact root `<root>` before composing any artifact path.**

- **Read** `docs_root` from `<repo-root>/.compound-engineering/config.yaml` only (`<repo-root>` = `git rev-parse --show-toplevel`). Do not read it from `config.local.yaml`. Unset -> `<root>` is `docs`, exactly as before.
- **Validate** a set value: a repo-relative directory whose real, symlink-resolved path stays inside the repo and is neither the repo root nor under `.git/`. Otherwise stop with an error naming `docs_root` and the value -- never fall back to `docs`.
- **Use** `<root>` as the sole artifact location: create it if absent, compose each path as `<root>/<subdir>` with this skill's own subdirectory, and never also read `docs`.
<!-- ce-docs-root:end -->

## Delegation

`ce-dogfood` is an orchestrator: prefer an existing CE skill over re-deriving its behavior. Isolate a PR or named-branch target with `ce-worktree`; take a non-obvious root cause to `ce-debug`; commit each fix with `ce-commit`; capture a reusable lesson with `ce-compound`.

## Compound Packs

The repo's declared Compound Packs supply personas and criteria. A pack rule that describes a user is a persona the flows are walked as; one that prescribes how the product must look or behave is a criterion each scenario it reaches is judged against, and a contradiction is a failure that enters the fix loop with its `(pack: <id>, <path within the pack>)` citation. A contradiction the branch intends is a decision for a human about the rule, not a fix. Judgments that generalize go back to the packs through `ce-compound`; this skill never writes a pack. `references/phases.md` defines how packs are applied.

## Phase order

Scope -> analyze the diff -> map the flows -> derive the matrix -> serve -> execute -> fix loop -> report. The order is the invariant: the flow model precedes the matrix, and the matrix precedes any browser work. Each phase's conditions are in `references/phases.md`; read it before Phase 0 (Scope) rather than reconstructing a phase from this line. Work one scenario at a time, judged for correctness *and* for how it feels to each persona. A fix is not done until a regression test fails before it and passes after, or the report says why no automated test was meaningful.

**Checkpoint, not a final write.** Create the report from `references/dogfood-report-template.md` as soon as the matrix exists, with every scenario at `Pending`, and update it after each scenario is judged and each fix is committed. `<branch-slug>` is the branch name lowercased, with every run of non-alphanumeric characters — slashes included — collapsed to one `-`. Find a prior run by globbing `<root>/dogfood-reports/*-<branch-slug>-dogfood.md`. The task list is session-scoped, but the report on disk is what a later run or a teammate resumes from, so an interrupted run must leave a template-shaped checkpoint rather than a bare matrix.

**Terminal states.** `Blocked (needs human verify)` (a step that needs an outside interaction, such as OAuth, real email, payments, or SMS, and cannot be driven headlessly) and `Blocked (human decision)` (a fix too big to make autonomously) both wait on a person, and each ends that scenario, not the run: continue the rest of the matrix, and never silently re-queue a blocked scenario, on this run or on resume. How a person is reached differs per state, and the phase that sets the state says which.

© EveryInc · MIT · EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin

Similar skills

All skills for Testing and QA →

From the same set34

Project sponsors

Companies that keep this analytics open
Gold sponsor

Impressions, clicks and code copies — open statistics. We keep the numbers public for the same reason NeBlask itself is public. Become a sponsor