Skip to main content
skill CX Codex

analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator — Codex skill

Queries ATT&CK data for APT groups and builds MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers to compare TTP coverage and spot detection gaps.

Install into Claude Code · Skills CLI (Vercel) All methods and platforms ↓
npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator -a claude-code
Open on GitHub

What analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator does

This skill queries ATT&CK group and technique data with attackcti, then builds technique maps with tactics, platforms, and data sources. It can compare several APT groups, create MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers, and overlay them against detection coverage.

The included Python workflow covers group lookup, Navigator layer JSON generation, and multi-group technique comparison. It requires Python 3.9+ with attackcti, mitreattack-python, stix2, and requests, plus MITRE ATT&CK Navigator or a local deployment. Threat-intelligence reports or MISP/OpenCTI access are also listed as prerequisites. Check the Python environment and data source first.

Layers can hold technique scores, colors, comments, and metadata for the Enterprise ATT&CK matrix. The output supports detection-gap analysis, threat hunting, and threat-intelligence reporting.

What it helps with

  • look up ATT&CK techniques used by an APT group
  • generate a JSON layer for MITRE ATT&CK Navigator
  • compare TTPs across several groups
  • map group techniques against detection coverage
  • prepare data for a threat-intelligence report

Example prompts for the agent

  • Analyze APT29 with ATT&CK and save the technique map as apt29_layer.json.
  • Compare APT29, APT28, and Lazarus Group, then identify their shared techniques.
  • Build a MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layer for this group with tactics, platforms, and comments.

How to install analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator

1Skills CLI (Vercel)

npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator -a claude-code

2Manually: put the files in place

~/.claude/skills/analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator/SKILL.md

Copy the whole skill folder; for one project use .claude/skills/analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator/

Step by step, with commands for each platform: How to install skills in Claude Code: five ways

Questions about analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator

How do I install analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator in Codex?

Run npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator -a codex, then use .agents/skills/analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator/SKILL.md.

What does analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator do?

It queries ATT&CK data about groups and their techniques, creates MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers, and supports technique-coverage comparisons for detection-gap analysis.

What does this skill require?

It requires Python 3.9+ with attackcti, mitreattack-python, stix2, and requests, MITRE ATT&CK Navigator or a local deployment, and threat-intelligence data from reports or MISP/OpenCTI.

Source text

SKILL.md · Apache-2.0
---
name: analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator
description: Query ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: threat-intelligence
tags:
- mitre-attack
- navigator
- apt
- threat-actor
- ttp-analysis
- heatmap
- detection-gap
- threat-intelligence
version: '1.0'
author: mahipal
license: Apache-2.0
d3fend_techniques:
- Executable Denylisting
- Execution Isolation
- File Metadata Consistency Validation
- Content Format Conversion
- File Content Analysis
nist_csf:
- ID.RA-01
- ID.RA-05
- DE.CM-01
- DE.AE-02
mitre_attack:
- T1059.001
- T1071.001
- T1003.001
- T1486
- T1547.001
---
# Analyzing APT Group with MITRE ATT&CK Navigator

## Overview

MITRE ATT&CK Navigator is a web-based tool for annotating and exploring ATT&CK matrices, enabling analysts to visualize threat actor technique coverage, compare multiple APT groups, identify detection gaps, and build threat-informed defense strategies. This skill covers querying ATT&CK data programmatically, mapping APT group TTPs to Navigator layers, creating multi-layer overlays for gap analysis, and generating actionable intelligence reports for detection engineering teams.


## When to Use

- When investigating security incidents that require analyzing apt group with mitre navigator
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques

## Prerequisites

- Python 3.9+ with `attackcti`, `mitreattack-python`, `stix2`, `requests` libraries
- ATT&CK Navigator (https://mitre-attack.github.io/attack-navigator/) or local deployment
- Understanding of ATT&CK Enterprise matrix: 14 Tactics, 200+ Techniques, Sub-techniques
- Access to threat intelligence reports or MISP/OpenCTI for threat actor data
- Familiarity with STIX 2.1 Intrusion Set and Attack Pattern objects

## Key Concepts

### ATT&CK Navigator Layers

Navigator layers are JSON files that annotate ATT&CK techniques with scores, colors, comments, and metadata. Each layer can represent a single APT group's technique usage, a detection capability map, or a combined overlay. Layer version 4.5 supports enterprise-attack, mobile-attack, and ics-attack domains with filtering by platform (Windows, Linux, macOS, Cloud, Azure AD, Office 365, SaaS).

### APT Group Profiles in ATT&CK

ATT&CK catalogs over 140 threat groups with documented technique usage. Each group profile includes aliases, targeted sectors, associated campaigns, software used, and technique mappings with procedure-level detail. Groups are identified by G-codes (e.g., G0016 for APT29, G0007 for APT28, G0032 for Lazarus Group).

### Multi-Layer Analysis

The Navigator supports loading multiple layers simultaneously, allowing analysts to overlay threat actor TTPs against detection coverage to identify gaps, compare multiple APT groups to find common techniques worth prioritizing, and track technique coverage changes over time.

## Workflow

### Step 1: Query ATT&CK Data for APT Group

```python
from attackcti import attack_client
import json

lift = attack_client()

# Get all threat groups
groups = lift.get_groups()
print(f"Total ATT&CK groups: {len(groups)}")

# Find APT29 (Cozy Bear / Midnight Blizzard)
apt29 = next((g for g in groups if g.get('name') == 'APT29'), None)
if apt29:
    print(f"Group: {apt29['name']}")
    print(f"Aliases: {apt29.get('aliases', [])}")
    print(f"Description: {apt29.get('description', '')[:300]}")

# Get techniques used by APT29 (G0016)
techniques = lift.get_techniques_used_by_group("G0016")
print(f"APT29 uses {len(techniques)} techniques")

technique_map = {}
for tech in techniques:
    tech_id = ""
    for ref in tech.get("external_references", []):
        if ref.get("source_name") == "mitre-attack":
            tech_id = ref.get("external_id", "")
            break
    if tech_id:
        tactics = [p.get("phase_name", "") for p in tech.get("kill_chain_phases", [])]
        technique_map[tech_id] = {
            "name": tech.get("name", ""),
            "tactics": tactics,
            "description": tech.get("description", "")[:500],
            "platforms": tech.get("x_mitre_platforms", []),
            "data_sources": tech.get("x_mitre_data_sources", []),
        }
```

### Step 2: Generate Navigator Layer JSON

```python
def create_navigator_layer(group_name, technique_map, color="#ff6666"):
    techniques_list = []
    for tech_id, info in technique_map.items():
        for tactic in info["tactics"]:
            techniques_list.append({
                "techniqueID": tech_id,
                "tactic": tactic,
                "color": color,
                "comment": info["name"],
                "enabled": True,
                "score": 100,
                "metadata": [
                    {"name": "group", "value": group_name},
                    {"name": "platforms", "value": ", ".join(info["platforms"])},
                ],
            })

    layer = {
        "name": f"{group_name} TTP Coverage",
        "versions": {"attack": "16.1", "navigator": "5.1.0", "layer": "4.5"},
        "domain": "enterprise-attack",
        "description": f"Techniques attributed to {group_name}",
        "filters": {
            "platforms": ["Linux", "macOS", "Windows", "Cloud",
                          "Azure AD", "Office 365", "SaaS", "Google Workspace"]
        },
        "sorting": 0,
        "layout": {
            "layout": "side", "aggregateFunction": "average",
            "showID": True, "showName": True,
            "showAggregateScores": False, "countUnscored": False,
        },
        "hideDisabled": False,
        "techniques": techniques_list,
        "gradient": {"colors": ["#ffffff", color], "minValue": 0, "maxValue": 100},
        "legendItems": [
            {"label": f"Used by {group_name}", "color": color},
            {"label": "Not observed", "color": "#ffffff"},
        ],
        "showTacticRowBackground": True,
        "tacticRowBackground": "#dddddd",
        "selectTechniquesAcrossTactics": True,
        "selectSubtechniquesWithParent": False,
        "selectVisibleTechniques": False,
    }
    return layer

layer = create_navigator_layer("APT29", technique_map)
with open("apt29_layer.json", "w") as f:
    json.dump(layer, f, indent=2)
print("[+] Layer saved: apt29_layer.json")
```

### Step 3: Compare Multiple APT Groups

```python
groups_to_compare = {"G0016": "APT29", "G0007": "APT28", "G0032": "Lazarus Group"}
group_techniques = {}

for gid, gname in groups_to_compare.items():
    techs = lift.get_techniques_used_by_group(gid)
    tech_ids = set()
    for t in techs:
        for ref in t.get("external_references", []):
            if ref.get("source_name") == "mitre-attack":
                tech_ids.add(ref.get("external_id", ""))
    group_techniques[gname] = tech_ids

common_to_all = set.intersection(*group_techniques.values())
print(f"Techniques common to all groups: {len(common_to_all)}")
for tid in sorted(common_to_all):
    print(f"  {tid}")

for gname, techs in group_techniques.items():
    others = set.union(*[t for n, t in group_techniques.items() if n != gname])
    unique = techs - others
    print(f"\nUnique to {gname}: {len(unique)} techniques")
```

### Step 4: Detection Gap Analysis with Layer Overlay

```python
# Define your current detection capabilities
detected_techniques = {
    "T1059", "T1059.001", "T1071", "T1071.001", "T1566", "T1566.001",
    "T1547", "T1547.001", "T1053", "T1053.005", "T1078", "T1027",
}

actor_techniques = set(technique_map.keys())
covered = actor_techniques.intersection(detected_techniques)
gaps = actor_techniques - detected_techniques

print(f"=== Detection Gap Analysis for APT29 ===")
print(f"Actor techniques: {len(actor_techniques)}")
print(f"Detected: {len(covered)} ({len(covered)/len(actor_techniques)*100:.0f}%)")
print(f"Gaps: {len(gaps)} ({len(gaps)/len(actor_techniques)*100:.0f}%)")

# Create gap layer (red = undetected, green = detected)
gap_techniques = []
for tech_id in actor_techniques:
    info = technique_map.get(tech_id, {})
    for tactic in info.get("tactics", [""]):
        color = "#66ff66" if tech_id in detected_techniques else "#ff3333"
        gap_techniques.append({
            "techniqueID": tech_id,
            "tactic": tactic,
            "color": color,
            "comment": f"{'DETECTED' if tech_id in detected_techniques else 'GAP'}: {info.get('name', '')}",
            "enabled": True,
            "score": 100 if tech_id in detected_techniques else 0,
        })

gap_layer = {
    "name": "APT29 Detection Gap Analysis",
    "versions": {"attack": "16.1", "navigator": "5.1.0", "layer": "4.5"},
    "domain": "enterprise-attack",
    "description": "Green = detected, Red = gap",
    "techniques": gap_techniques,
    "gradient": {"colors": ["#ff3333", "#66ff66"], "minValue": 0, "maxValue": 100},
    "legendItems": [
        {"label": "Detected", "color": "#66ff66"},
        {"label": "Detection Gap", "color": "#ff3333"},
    ],
}
with open("apt29_gap_layer.json", "w") as f:
    json.dump(gap_layer, f, indent=2)
```

### Step 5: Tactic Breakdown Analysis

```python
from collections import defaultdict

tactic_breakdown = defaultdict(list)
for tech_id, info in technique_map.items():
    for tactic in info["tactics"]:
        tactic_breakdown[tactic].append({"id": tech_id, "name": info["name"]})

tactic_order = [
    "reconnaissance", "resource-development", "initial-access",
    "execution", "persistence", "privilege-escalation",
    "defense-evasion", "credential-access", "discovery",
    "lateral-movement", "collection", "command-and-control",
    "exfiltration", "impact",
]

print("\n=== APT29 Tactic Breakdown ===")
for tactic in tactic_order:
    techs = tactic_breakdown.get(tactic, [])
    if techs:
        print(f"\n{tactic.upper()} ({len(techs)} techniques):")
        for t in techs:
            print(f"  {t['id']}: {t['name']}")
```

## Validation Criteria

- ATT&CK data queried successfully via TAXII server
- APT group mapped to all documented techniques with procedure examples
- Navigator layer JSON validates and renders correctly in ATT&CK Navigator
- Multi-layer overlay shows threat actor vs. detection coverage
- Detection gap analysis identifies unmonitored techniques with data source recommendations
- Cross-group comparison reveals shared and unique TTPs
- Output is actionable for detection engineering prioritization

## References

- [MITRE ATT&CK Navigator](https://mitre-attack.github.io/attack-navigator/)
- [ATT&CK Groups](https://attack.mitre.org/groups/)
- [attackcti Python Library](https://github.com/OTRF/ATTACK-Python-Client)
- [Navigator Layer Format v4.5](https://github.com/mitre-attack/attack-navigator/blob/master/layers/LAYERFORMATv4_5.md)
- [CISA Best Practices for MITRE ATT&CK Mapping](https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2023-01/Best%20Practices%20for%20MITRE%20ATTCK%20Mapping.pdf)
- [Picus: Leverage MITRE ATT&CK for Threat Intelligence](https://www.picussecurity.com/how-to-leverage-the-mitre-attack-framework-for-threat-intelligence)

© mahipal · Apache-2.0 · mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

Similar skills

Everything for Security →

From the same set89

analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing Monitors Certificate Transparency logs to spot phishing lookalikes and certificate issuance affecting an organisation’s domains. CX Codex +1 547installs analyzing-active-directory-acl-abuse Reads Domain Controller DACLs over LDAP with ldap3, parses them into SDDL and reports ACEs where non-admin accounts hold GenericAll, WriteDACL or WriteOwner. CX Codex +1 548installs testing-api-for-broken-object-level-authorization Tests REST and GraphQL APIs for BOLA and IDOR flaws by swapping object identifiers across requests. Helps detect broken access controls between different user accounts. CX Codex +1 541installs testing-jwt-token-security A skill that walks an agent through JWT weaknesses: algorithm confusion, weak HMAC secrets, authorization bypass. Built for API and SSO pentests. CX Codex +1 536installs analyzing-network-traffic-with-wireshark A skill that walks your agent through packet capture and analysis with Wireshark and tshark: C2 traffic, leaks, protocol faults. CX Codex +1 533installs analyzing-dns-logs-for-exfiltration Reads DNS query logs and hunts for tunneling, DGA domains and covert C2 channels. Useful when traffic slips past firewalls and proxies. CX Codex +1 527installs analyzing-command-and-control-communication This skill examines malware C2 traffic to map protocols, beacon patterns, encoding, commands, and infrastructure. Use it when a PCAP needs protocol analysis or detection signatures. CX Codex +1 528installs testing-for-broken-access-control Guides testing of web apps and APIs for broken access control flaws under OWASP A01:2021. Useful during RBAC audits and multi-tenant data boundary checks. CX Codex +1 522installs

Project sponsors

Companies that keep this analytics open
Gold sponsor

Impressions, clicks and code copies — open statistics. We keep the numbers public for the same reason NeBlask itself is public. Become a sponsor