assuredworkloads-environment-assessor — скилл для Claude Code

---
name: assuredworkloads-environment-assessor
metadata:
  version: "1.0.1"
  category: SecurityAndCompliance
description: >-
  Discover Google Cloud resource telemetry and effective Org Policies, evaluate brownfield workloads against
  sovereign data boundary and compliance standards (EU Data Boundary with Support, FedRAMP Moderate/High, DoD IL4/IL5,
  ITAR, CJIS, US/EU Regional Data Boundaries), and recommend the optimal Assured Workloads Framework. Use
  when asked to: "assess my environment for compliance", "which Assured Workloads framework
  should I use?", "check if my folder is ready for EU sovereignty", "evaluate compliance
  posture for folders/123 or projects/xyz", or "discover compliance gaps before deployment".
  Do NOT use for live mutating policy deployments, generating deep audit reports via Cloud Audit Manager,
  generating remediation scripts, or authoring custom Assured Workloads frameworks.
---

# Compliance Environment Assessor Skill

This skill performs zero-risk, non-mutating compliance discovery, physical telemetry profiling, and data boundary framework recommendation across Google Cloud Folders (`folders/{folder_id}`) and Projects (`projects/{project_id}`).

## Usage Attribution

**MUST READ**: Before executing any `gcloud`, REST API, or MCP command, you
MUST read and follow the instructions in
[Usage Attribution](references/attribution.md).

## Safety & Execution Tier (CRITICAL)

* **Tier R (Strictly Read-Only)**:
  All discovery operations execute read-only queries
  (`gcloud asset search-all-resources`,
  `gcloud compliance-manager frameworks list`,
  `gcloud compliance-manager cloud-controls describe`, and
  `gcloud org-policies describe --effective`).
  You MUST NEVER execute mutating commands (`gcloud compliance-manager framework-deployments create`,
  `gcloud org-policies set-policy`, or `gcloud resource-manager ...`).

---

## Grounding Guardrails: Google Cloud & Assured Workloads Precedence (CRITICAL)

To prevent hallucinations, incorrect compliance assessments, and false blockers derived from generic LLM pre-training, the agent is governed by strict **Grounding Guardrails**:

1. **Strict Prohibition on Generic LLM Pre-Training Priors**:
   * You MUST NOT derive compliance rules, API semantics, or deployment constraints from generic web pre-training (e.g., generic NIST/FedRAMP certification audit checklists, AWS/Azure architectures, or legacy on-prem IT auditor mindsets).
   * In traditional IT audits, non-compliance is a binary go/no-go gate that
     blocks deployment. In Google Cloud Assured Workloads v2, **Monitor Mode
     deploys detective controls without mutating existing Organization
     Policies**, allowing continuous observability without halting Day 0
     rollout. You MUST NOT confuse these paradigms.
2. **Authoritative Google Cloud API Contracts & Scope Grounding**:
   * All API assumptions MUST be grounded in published Google Cloud API contracts:
     - **Assured Workloads v1 GA API** (`assuredworkloads.googleapis.com/v1`): Greenfield-only. Contract only creates a brand-new folder (`resourceType: CONSUMER_FOLDER`). It CANNOT adopt or bind to existing brownfield folders (`folders/...`) or projects in-place.
     - **Assured Workloads v2 API** (`assuredworkloads.googleapis.com/v2`): Brownfield-native. Contract binds directly to existing resource hierarchies (`existingFolder`, `existingProject`) and supports non-mutating Monitor Mode (`enforcementMode: DETECTIVE`).
3. **Client-Side Org Policy Readiness vs. Server-Side CES Boundary**:
   * **Client-Side Scope**: Pre-flight evaluation via
     `scripts/evaluate_control_rules.py` assesses **ONLY the 3 high-confidence
     Organization Policy parameter sets** bound in
     `Framework.cloudControlDetails[].parameters`:
     1. Resource Locations (`builtin-restrict-resource-locations` /
        `constraints/gcp.resourceLocations`)
     2. Service Usage Restrictions / SUR
        (`builtin-enforce-service-usage-restrictions` /
        `constraints/gcp.restrictServiceUsage`)
     3. CMEK Encryption Requirements (`builtin-require-cmek` /
        `constraints/gcp.restrictNonCmekServices`)
   * **Server-Side CES Scope**: Complex Continuous Evaluation Service
     (`ces_rule`) and REST API rules (`rest_api_measurement`) are evaluated
     **server-side by the Continuous Evaluation Service (CES)** after the
     framework is deployed.
   * **Terminology Invariant**: You MUST frame client-side findings as
     **Pre-Flight Org Policy Readiness Recommendations / Potential Drift
     Indicators** (`orgPolicyDriftIndicators`), NEVER as definitive compliance
     "violations" or "deployment blockers" that could contradict an actual
     post-deployment CES run.
4. **Static Built-In Catalog, Session Caching, Support Routing & KAJ Flow**:
   * Built-in Frameworks (`type: BUILT_IN`) returned by
     `gcloud compliance-manager frameworks list` are static configurations
     uniform across organizations. Fetch `frameworks.json` once per session and
     reuse the cached file across all candidate evaluations and follow-up
     queries.
   * **Personnel Support Model**: A framework requires a **Paid
     Sovereign/Regulated Support Subscription** when
     `builtin-restrict-technical-support-services` is present in its
     `cloudControlDetails` (as reflected in its `displayName` and
     `description`). Frameworks without
     `builtin-restrict-technical-support-services` (e.g.,
     `builtin-us-data-boundary`, `builtin-eu-data-boundary`) use **Standard
     Commercial Support** ($0 support uplift).
   * **Key Access Justifications (KAJ) & EKM**: Recommend
     `-with-access-justifications` framework variants only when the customer
     **explicitly requests KAJ/EKM**, or when disambiguating between matching
     regional variants in `frameworks.json`.
5. **Deterministic Tool Gating**:
   * You MUST NOT guess compatibility scores ($$S_{\text{composite}}$$) or resource inventories.
   * You MUST execute `scripts/evaluate_control_rules.py` with `--frameworks-file=frameworks.json` and `scripts/validate_workload_payload.py` with `--frameworks-file=frameworks.json`.

## Prerequisites

Before executing environment assessment, ensure your local or Cloud Shell environment meets the following prerequisites:

1. **Google Cloud SDK**:
   * Install and initialize the latest Google Cloud CLI (`gcloud`): https://docs.cloud.google.com/sdk/docs/install.md.txt
2. **Project Setup & Target Selection**:
   * Select or configure an administrative project for running assessment queries:
     ```bash
     gcloud config set project PROJECT_ID
     ```
3. **Region Configuration & Availability**:
   * Configure a well-supported default region (e.g. `us-central1`):
     ```bash
     gcloud config set compute/region us-central1
     ```
   * Consult official region availability documentation: [Google Cloud Locations](https://cloud.google.com/about/locations). Note that preview models or APIs are often restricted to `global` or `us-central1`.
4. **Required API Enablement**:
   * Enable the required Google Cloud APIs on the administrative project:
     ```bash
     gcloud services enable \
       cloudasset.googleapis.com \
       orgpolicy.googleapis.com \
       assuredworkloads.googleapis.com \
       cloudsecuritycompliance.googleapis.com
     ```
5. **Authentication Setup**:
   * Authenticate your user or service account identity and establish application default credentials:
     ```bash
     gcloud auth login
     gcloud auth application-default login
     ```
6. **Billing & Quota Project Setup (Zero Billing Impact)**:
   * **Zero-Cost Assessment Guarantee**: Running this assessment incurs **$0 in
     Google Cloud infrastructure and API billing charges**. All discovery
     operations (`gcloud asset search-all-resources`,
     `gcloud compliance-manager frameworks list`, and
     `gcloud org-policies describe --effective`) are free read-only metadata
     queries.
   * **Quota Project Requirement**: Google Cloud Service Infrastructure requires an administrative project with an active Cloud Billing account attached to allocate API rate limits and meter service usage (sent via the `X-Goog-User-Project` header), even for free APIs.
   * **Pre-Flight Verification**:
     ```bash
     # 1. Verify active Cloud Billing account is attached to administrative project
     gcloud billing projects describe PROJECT_ID --format="value(billingEnabled)"

     # 2. If using a shared project, ensure your user identity has permission to consume project quota
     gcloud projects add-iam-policy-binding PROJECT_ID \
       --member="user:USER_EMAIL" \
       --role="roles/serviceusage.serviceUsageConsumer"

     # 3. Synchronize Application Default Credentials quota project
     gcloud auth application-default set-quota-project PROJECT_ID
     ```
7. **Commands & Payloads Reference**:
   * Consult the [Google Cloud CLI Commands Reference](references/gcloud-commands.md) for full server-side projection masks, field filters, and API payload definitions.

---

## Step-by-Step Operating Workflow

### Step 1: Ingest Scope & Resolve Organization ID

1. Accept or prompt for the target scope (`folders/{folder_id}` or `projects/{project_id}`). If the user provides an open-ended scope without stating a regulatory regime, DO NOT block on broad questionnaires. Proceed immediately to ingest telemetry.
2. Automatically resolve the parent Organization ID from the scope to drive downstream catalog queries:
   * **For Folders**:
     ```bash
     gcloud resource-manager folders describe FOLDER_ID --format="value(parent)"
     ```
     *(If the parent is another folder, traverse up ancestors until `organizations/{org_id}` is found)*
   * **For Projects**:
     ```bash
     gcloud projects get-ancestors PROJECT_ID --format="value(id,type)"
     ```

### Step 2: Ingest Asset Telemetry & Effective Org Policies via Two-Pass Telescoping Protocol

To guarantee 100% coverage across the scope hierarchy while keeping payloads compact, telemetry ingestion executes in two telescoping passes (see [Google Cloud CLI Commands Reference](references/gcloud-commands.md)):

1. **Pass 1: Macro Footprint & API Enumeration (100% Scope Coverage)**:
   ```bash
   gcloud asset search-all-resources \
     --scope="folders/FOLDER_ID" \
     --page-size=500 \
     --format="json(name,assetType,location)" > macro_telemetry.json
   ```
   * *Pagination & Scope Semantics*: `--page-size=500` fetches 500 cloud assets
     per HTTP API page (the maximum batch size permitted by Cloud Asset
     Inventory), automatically paginating through all assets strictly inside
     `folders/FOLDER_ID` and its descendant projects.
   * *Full Location & SUR Coverage*: `macro_telemetry.json` captures 100% of
     active `location` and `assetType` values required to evaluate both
     `builtin-restrict-resource-locations` (`allowedLocations`) and
     `builtin-enforce-service-usage-restrictions` (`allowedServices` / SUR).
   * If `PERMISSION_DENIED` is returned:
     - If the error states `USER_PROJECT_DENIED` or references `roles/serviceusage.serviceUsageConsumer`, the error is on the **administrative quota project** (it lacks an attached billing account or caller lacks `serviceUsageConsumer`). Follow the Quota Project Recovery playbook and stop running further commands.
     - If the error references the target scope (`folders/...` or `projects/...`), HALT ALL TOOL CALLS IMMEDIATELY (do not run Step 2.2, Step 3, or any further commands) and inform the user they require `roles/cloudasset.viewer` and `roles/orgpolicy.policyViewer` on that scope.
   * If 0 resources are returned, inform the user the target scope is empty.

2. **Inspect Effective Universal Org Policies on Scope (`38/38` Frameworks)**:
   ```bash
   gcloud org-policies describe gcp.resourceLocations \
     --folder=FOLDER_ID \
     --effective \
     --format="json(name,spec.rules)" > effective_locations.json

   gcloud org-policies describe gcp.restrictServiceUsage \
     --folder=FOLDER_ID \
     --effective \
     --format="json(name,spec.rules)" > effective_services.json

   gcloud org-policies describe gcp.restrictTLSVersion \
     --folder=FOLDER_ID \
     --effective \
     --format="json(name,spec.rules)" > effective_tls.json
   ```

### Step 3: Fetch & Cache Built-In Framework Catalog and Filter by Location + SUR

1. **Fetch & Cache Built-In Framework Catalog (with Bound Parameters)**:
   ```bash
   if [ ! -s frameworks.json ]; then
     gcloud compliance-manager frameworks list \
       --organization=ORGANIZATION_ID \
       --location=global \
       --filter="category:ASSURED_WORKLOADS" \
       --format="json(name,majorRevisionId,displayName,description,category,cloudControlDetails)" > frameworks.json
   fi
   ```
   * *Session Caching*: Because built-in `ASSURED_WORKLOADS` frameworks are
     static definitions uniform across organizations, cache the output in
     `frameworks.json` and reuse it for all candidate evaluations, payload
     validations, and follow-up questions.
2. **Filter Candidates by Location + SUR Footprint & Clarify Intent**:
   * Exclude location-less control-plane management metadata
     (`cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/*`, `orgpolicy.googleapis.com/*`,
     `cloudasset.googleapis.com/*`, `accesscontextmanager.googleapis.com/*`, and
     `location: "global"` hierarchy nodes) from data-plane location checks.
   * Match active data-plane regions (`location`) and active service prefixes
     (`assetType`) from `macro_telemetry.json` against each framework's
     `builtin-restrict-resource-locations` (`allowedLocations`) and
     `builtin-enforce-service-usage-restrictions` (`allowedServices` / SUR)
     parameters in `frameworks.json`:
     * **US-Only Regions (`us-central1`, `us-east4`)**: Candidates include DoD
       IL5 (`builtin-il5`, adjudicated support), ITAR (`builtin-itar`, US
       persons support), FedRAMP High/Moderate, or US Regional Data Boundary
       (`builtin-us-data-boundary`, standard commercial support).
     * **EU-Only Regions (`europe-west3`, `europe-west1`)**: Candidates include
       EU Data Boundary and Support (`builtin-eu-data-boundary-and-support`) vs.
       standard EU Regional Boundary (`builtin-eu-data-boundary`).
   * **Targeted Disambiguation**:
     * If multiple frameworks match the physical footprint and user regulatory
       intent is unstated (e.g., an open-ended request with no regime specified),
       DO NOT finalize a single primary recommendation yet — present the matching
       candidate frameworks and STOP to ask the user a targeted clarifying
       question about their regulatory intent (e.g., EU Sovereignty, US
       FedRAMP/IL5) and personnel support model (Standard Commercial Support vs.
       Paid Sovereign/Regulated Support).
     * Recommend `-with-access-justifications` (KAJ/EKM) framework variants only
       if the customer explicitly asks for KAJ/EKM or when disambiguating
       between matching regional variants.
     * **Out-of-Scope / Non-Catalog Compliance Standards (e.g., CMMC, UK
       GDPR)**:
       If the user asks to evaluate a compliance standard or legal certification
       that is not present as a built-in `ASSURED_WORKLOADS` framework in
       `frameworks.json` (such as CMMC, UK GDPR, SOC 2, or PCI-DSS), DO NOT
       fabricate or pass non-existent framework IDs (e.g., `builtin-cmmc` or
       `builtin-uk-gdpr`) to `evaluate_control_rules.py` or
       `validate_workload_payload.py`. Explicitly state that the requested
       standard is not a standalone Assured Workloads Data Boundary framework,
       explain the catalog scope boundary (Data Boundary enforces regional data
       residency, SUR, CMEK, and sovereign support routing rather than legal
       privacy or third-party certification audits), and offer the closest
       adjacent `ASSURED_WORKLOADS` frameworks from `frameworks.json` that match
       their active regional footprint (e.g., `builtin-il5` or
       `builtin-fedramp-high` for US defense/CUI workloads, or
       `builtin-eu-data-boundary-and-support` / `builtin-eu-data-boundary` /
       `builtin-uk-data-boundary` for European/UK regional residency).

### Step 4: Conditional Pass 2 CMEK Ingestion & Org Policy Evaluation

1. **Pass 2: Conditional Targeted Deep Ingestion for CMEK Resource Types**:
   Derive `TARGET_TYPES` (the intersection of active CAI `assetType`s in
   `macro_telemetry.json` and CMEK-governed services in `builtin-require-cmek`
   from `frameworks.json`). Only 6 of the 38 Data Boundary frameworks include
   `builtin-require-cmek`; if `TARGET_TYPES` is non-empty, fetch `kmsKeys`:
   ```bash
   TARGET_TYPES=$(python3 scripts/evaluate_control_rules.py \
     --get-target-asset-types \
     --framework=FRAMEWORK_ID \
     --telemetry-file=macro_telemetry.json \
     --frameworks-file=frameworks.json)

   if [ -n "${TARGET_TYPES}" ]; then
     gcloud asset search-all-resources \
       --scope="folders/FOLDER_ID" \
       --asset-types="${TARGET_TYPES}" \
       --page-size=500 \
       --format="json(name,assetType,location,kmsKeys)" > deep_telemetry.json
   fi
   ```
2. **Execute High-Confidence Org Policy Evaluator**:
   Run `scripts/evaluate_control_rules.py` over `macro_telemetry.json` (and
   optional `deep_telemetry.json`) with `frameworks.json` to compute the 3
   quantitative scores (`locationScore`, `serviceScore`, `cmekScore`,
   `compositeScore`) and `orgPolicyDriftIndicators` (when `cmekRequired` is
   `false`, always display the CMEK Readiness column as `N/A` in the scorecard):
   ```bash
   python3 scripts/evaluate_control_rules.py \
     --telemetry-file=macro_telemetry.json \
     --deep-telemetry-file=deep_telemetry.json \
     --framework=FRAMEWORK_ID \
     --frameworks-file=frameworks.json
   ```
3. **Evaluate Operational & Governance Impact**:
   * Review `cloudControlDetails` in `frameworks.json` for parameterized and
     operational controls (`builtin-restrict-kms-protection-levels`,
     `builtin-enforce-allowed-cmek-crypto-key-projects`,
     `builtin-restrict-cloud-function-generations`,
     `builtin-restrict-cloudstorage-auth-types`,
     `builtin-iam-disable-service-account-key-creation`,
     `builtin-disable-ssh-in-browser`, `builtin-enable-axt`, and
     `*-regulatory-settings` controls like
     `builtin-cloud-logging-regulatory-settings`) and summarize their workflow
     impact in the final report.
4. **Validate Turnkey Assured Workloads Payload**:
   ```bash
   python3 scripts/validate_workload_payload.py \
     --payload-json='{"displayName":"Sovereign-Workload-Enclave","resourceConfig":{"existingFolder":"folders/FOLDER_ID"},"framework":{"framework":"organizations/ORGANIZATION_ID/locations/global/frameworks/FRAMEWORK_ID"}}' \
     --org-id=ORGANIZATION_ID \
     --frameworks-file=frameworks.json
   ```

### Step 5: Render Executive Assessment Report (Minto Pyramid Structure)

Present an executive report structured around the **Minto Pyramid Principle**
(Bottom Line Up Front -> Core Value Pillars -> Supporting Evidence -> Action
Plan):

```markdown
# Compliance Environment Assessment Report: [Scope URI]

## 1. Executive Conclusion & Recommendation (Bottom Line Up Front)
* **Primary Recommendation**: [Framework Name] (`organizations/{org_id}/locations/global/frameworks/{framework_id}`)
* **Org Policy Readiness Alignment**: [Composite Fit %]
* **Value & Safety Invariant**: In-place brownfield adoption via Assured Workloads v2 in **Monitor Mode** (`enforcementMode: DETECTIVE`).
  * **Zero Production Outage Risk**: Mutates zero Organization Policies on Day 0.
  * **Continuous Server-Side CES Observability**: Activates real-time Continuous Evaluation Service (CES) monitoring across all framework controls.
  * **No Migration Required**: Protects existing resources in-place without provisioning separate folders.

---

## 2. Core Value Drivers: Why Assured Workloads Fits This Scope
1. **Residency & Boundary Alignment (`gcp.resourceLocations`)**: Active regional workloads are evaluated against allowed regions ([e.g. 100% US-contained]).
2. **Service & API Compatibility (`gcp.restrictServiceUsage` / SUR)**: Active service APIs are evaluated against accredited service allowlists ([e.g. 100% approved services]).
3. **Non-Disruptive Posture Hardening**: Enrolling in Monitor Mode provides server-side CES posture evaluation while allowing your team to triage Org Policy readiness safely.

---

## 3. Objective Assessment Scorecard & Org Policy Readiness Triage

### Quantitative Org Policy Readiness Scorecard
| Candidate Framework | Location Residency (`locationScore`) | Service Usage / SUR (`serviceScore`) | CMEK Readiness (`cmekScore`) | Composite Alignment | Personnel Support Model |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **[Framework 1]** | [XX%] | [XX%] | [XX% or N/A] | **[XX%]** | [Support Model] |
| **[Framework 2]** | [XX%] | [XX%] | [XX% or N/A] | **[XX%]** | [Support Model] |

### Active Resource & Effective Org Policy Baseline
* **Discovered Inventory**: [Total Assets count] across [Active resource types and regions].
* **Effective Org Policy Baseline**: [Effective `gcp.resourceLocations`, `gcp.restrictServiceUsage`, and `gcp.restrictTLSVersion` posture].

### Pre-Flight Org Policy Readiness Recommendations (Prior to Enforced Mode)
*Pre-flight drift indicators do NOT block Day 0 deployment in Monitor Mode. Address these prior to enabling preventive policy enforcement (authoritative CES and REST control evaluations run server-side after deployment):*
* **[Priority 1]**: [e.g. Configure CMEK keys on unencrypted resources before toggling `builtin-require-cmek` to `PREVENTIVE`].
* **[Priority 2]**: [e.g. Operational impact of bound controls such as `builtin-restrict-kms-protection-levels` or `builtin-cloud-logging-regulatory-settings`].

---

## 4. Deployment Action Plan & Commercial Advisory

### Deploy via Google Cloud Console (Recommended)
Review and deploy the recommended framework directly in the Google Cloud Console:
👉 **[Open Assured Workloads Console](https://console.cloud.google.com/compliance/assuredworkloads?organizationId=ORGANIZATION_ID)**
*(The Console deployment wizard binds composing controls in Monitor Mode with zero infrastructure mutations).*

### Commercial & Licensing Advisory
* Assured Workloads compliance regimes may carry support routing or licensing entitlements depending on whether `builtin-restrict-technical-support-services` is bound (standard commercial support vs. paid sovereign/regulated support).
* Review full pricing details and entitlement tiers at: https://cloud.google.com/assured-workloads/pricing
```

### Step 6: Handling Customer Follow-Up Questions on Specific Services

When a customer follows up with a specific question about how a recommended or
candidate framework affects a particular Google Cloud service (e.g., Cloud Run,
Cloud Storage, Spanner, GKE, Cloud SQL, Vertex AI, Cloud Logging):
1. **Inspect Cached `frameworks.json` Locally (or Fetch via Step 3 `frameworks list` if Not Cached)**:
   * If `frameworks.json` is not yet present in the current working directory, run the Step 3 `gcloud compliance-manager frameworks list` command first to populate `frameworks.json`.
   * Check whether `<service>.googleapis.com` is permitted in
     `builtin-enforce-service-usage-restrictions` (`allowedServices`) and
     whether CMEK is required in `builtin-require-cmek` (`services`).
   * Identify all service-specific `cloudControlDetails[].name` entries bound in
     that framework (e.g., `builtin-run-disable-ephemeral-disk`,
     `builtin-restrict-cloudstorage-auth-types`,
     `builtin-disable-spanner-multi-region`,
     `builtin-cloud-logging-regulatory-settings`) and any bound `parameters`.
2. **Fetch Authoritative Control Details On Demand**:
   * Because `Framework.cloudControlDetails` omits control descriptions,
     enforcement modes, and remediation steps, run `cloud-controls describe` for
     the relevant control ID(s):
     ```bash
     gcloud compliance-manager cloud-controls describe CONTROL_ID \
       --organization=ORGANIZATION_ID \
       --location=global \
       --format="json(name,displayName,description,supportedEnforcementModes,remediationSteps,parameterSpec)"
     ```
   * Extract the exact underlying Organization Policy constraint (e.g.,
     `run.managed.disableEphemeralDisk`, `storage.restrictAuthTypes`),
     `supportedEnforcementModes` (`PREVENTIVE` vs. `DETECTIVE`), and
     `remediationSteps` from the response.
3. **Check Effective Folder/Project Policy If Requested**:
   * If the customer asks whether their folder already enforces that
     service-specific Org Policy constraint, run:
     ```bash
     gcloud org-policies describe CONSTRAINT_NAME \
       --folder=FOLDER_ID \
       --effective \
       --format="json(name,spec.rules)"
     ```

---

## Failure Modes & Error Recovery Playbook

| Error Condition | Immediate Action | User Recovery Guidance |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **`USER_PROJECT_DENIED` or `serviceusage.serviceUsageConsumer`** | HALT discovery. Do not confuse with target scope permissions. Check administrative project billing status and caller quota permissions. | *"The administrative project `PROJECT_ID` cannot be used for API quota. 1) Verify a Cloud Billing account is attached (`gcloud billing projects describe PROJECT_ID`), 2) Grant `roles/serviceusage.serviceUsageConsumer` on `PROJECT_ID` to your identity, or 3) Switch to a project you own: `gcloud config set project <PROJECT_ID>`."* |
| **`PERMISSION_DENIED` on CAIS** | HALT discovery immediately. Do not speculate or guess resources. | *"To analyze this environment, grant `roles/cloudasset.viewer` on `folders/123` to your active identity."* |
| **`PERMISSION_DENIED` on Org Policies** | HALT policy inspection. Do not guess effective constraints. | *"To inspect effective organization policies, grant `roles/orgpolicy.policyViewer` on `folders/123`."* |
| **Empty Scope (0 Resources)** | HALT evaluation. Inform user the scope contains no active assets. | *"No active resources found in `folders/123`. Provision resources or select an active scope."* |
| **Conflicting Regulatory Intent** | Engage user in focused clarification probe. | Present distinct requirements (e.g. DoD IL5 Adjudicated Support vs. ITAR US Persons) and ask for business requirement. |
| **Zero Catalog Match** | Detail multi-regional drift indicator. | Explain why single-region sovereign data boundary frameworks were ruled out (e.g. multi-continental resource footprint spanning unapproved regions). |
| **Out-of-Scope / Non-Catalog Standard (e.g., CMMC, UK GDPR)** | Do not invent framework IDs (`builtin-cmmc`, `builtin-uk-gdpr`). Explain catalog boundary and map to adjacent `ASSURED_WORKLOADS` candidates. | *"Assured Workloads does not include a standalone `[CMMC / UK GDPR]` framework in `frameworks.json`. However, based on your active resources, we can evaluate an adjacent Assured Workloads Data Boundary framework such as `builtin-il5` / `builtin-fedramp-high` (for US defense/federal workloads) or `builtin-eu-data-boundary-and-support` / `builtin-uk-data-boundary` (for European/UK regional residency)."* |