positioning-and-story — скилл для Claude Code

---
name: positioning-and-story
description: Build a positioning and narrative where the developer is the hero and a real trend is the villain. Use when the messaging describes the product instead of the problem, sounds like every competitor, or has no urgency because nothing is at stake.
---

# Positioning & story

> Your story is boring without a villain. And you are not the hero of it. The developer is. You're the wise advisor who hands them a better weapon.

**Use this when:** your homepage explains what your product *does* before it names the problem, your positioning is interchangeable with three competitors, or nobody feels any urgency to act now.

## The core idea

Developers don't buy features; they hire a tool to defeat something that's making their life worse. Get the roles right:

- **Hero** = the developer (never the vendor, never the product)
- **Villain** = the undeniable *trend* making the pain worse every day
- **Wise Advisor** = you, arriving with a gift (the product)
- **Inciting event** = the change in the world that forces the hero to act *now*

No villain → no urgency → no story → no conversion.

## Framework: the 3-part story (Frankl)

1. **Inciting event**: introduce the hero and the villain; the world changed and the hero can't stay put.
2. **Obstacles**: a series of specific challenges, each solved with your help, best told as mini before/afters: *"Before X, we had [problem]. Now [measured result]."*
3. **Resolution**: villain defeated (for now), specific results, hero shares the wisdom → that's your testimonial.

**The benchmark (EngFlow):**
> *"Slow builds waste your time. Standard build tools can't handle today's codebases. Speed up builds now to keep engineers in flow."*

- Pain: slow builds waste your time
- Villain: standard tools can't handle modern complexity
- Hero: engineers, kept in flow
- Wise Advisor: the build experts

Good villains: cloud-cost sprawl · tool fragmentation · compounding tech debt · flaky pipelines · observability gaps · manual deploys · YAML sprawl · agents you can't trust in prod.

## Framework: the 4 levels of differentiation (Frankl)

Compete as high up this ladder as you can. Feature wars are a race to the bottom.

| Level | Type | Sounds like | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Feature | "we have X, they don't" | D |
| 2 | Benefit | "we save you time" | C |
| 3 | Customer segment | "for CTOs under release pressure with compliance" | B |
| 4 | **Problem** | "the only fix for [problem no one else has named]" | A |

**Reaching Level 4 / category creation:** talk to enough TAB members (see `talk-to-users`) to surface a problem competitors haven't named, then name it so precisely your product is the obvious answer. When rivals adopt your vocabulary, they've already lost the position. (JFrog: "artifact repository" → "Universal Artifact Repository" and leapfrogged Sonatype.)

## Decision tree

```
Can you state a problem only you solve, in the user's words?
├─ YES → Level 4. Lead with the problem; name the category.
└─ NO  → Can you name a specific segment with a compelling reason?
         ├─ YES → Level 3. Lead with the ICP + their trigger.
         └─ NO  → you're stuck at feature/benefit → go run `talk-to-users`.
```

## Mistakes that look reasonable

- **Product as hero**: "ShipFast helps you…" Make the developer the subject of the sentence.
- **No villain**: all solution, no antagonist → zero urgency.
- **"Platform"**: developers hear *months of integration and risk.* Name the specific thing it does.
- **"Pleased to announce"**: nobody cares about your emotional state; a feature is not a story, a customer win is.
- **Feature-matrix positioning**: a checklist vs competitors keeps you at Level 1 forever.

## Your next 30 minutes

- [ ] Write one sentence: **hero + villain + inciting event** (steal the EngFlow shape).
- [ ] Grade your current differentiation 1-4. If it's D/C, list what would move it to B/A.
- [ ] Find the villain in your `talk-to-users` "environmental changes" bucket, it's already there.
- [ ] Rewrite your headline so the *developer* is the subject and the *problem* comes before the product.

---
Built from real dev-tool GTM experience, with frameworks from Adam Frankl (*The Developer-Facing Startup*) and Jakub Czakon (*markepear.dev*).
Positioning is the one most worth a second opinion before you ship it everywhere. If you want yours pressure-tested, reach out to me on [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/devtoolgtm/).