git-workflow — скилл для Claude: ветки, коммиты, rebase
Скилл с готовыми правилами Git: какую стратегию ветвления выбрать, как писать коммиты и когда rebase лучше merge.
npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill git-workflow -a claude-codeЧто делает git-workflow
Скилл описывает три стратегии ветвления: GitHub Flow, trunk-based и GitFlow. Для каждой — свои правила: где живёт main, от какой ветки отводить фичу, что делать после ревью. Есть таблица, по которой видно, какая стратегия подходит под размер команды и частоту релизов.
Дальше — конвенция коммитов в формате Conventional Commits: типы feat, fix, docs, refactor, test, chore, perf, ci, revert и примеры хороших и плохих сообщений. Отдельно разобрано, когда merge сохраняет историю, а когда rebase её выпрямляет, и в каких случаях rebase делать нельзя. Плюс шаблон описания pull request и чеклист для ревьюера.
Внутри только markdown-инструкции, никаких скриптов и зависимостей. Ставить стоит, если в команде нет общего договора по веткам и коммитам или если вы один и хотите привести историю в порядок. Если правила уже зафиксированы в CONTRIBUTING и все им следуют, скилл ничего не добавит.
Какие задачи решает
- выбрать стратегию ветвления под размер команды
- написать сообщение коммита по Conventional Commits
- почистить локальные коммиты перед pull request
- решить, merge или rebase в конкретном случае
- разрешить конфликт при rebase на свежий main
Примеры запросов агенту
- Помоги выбрать стратегию ветвления для нашего проекта
- Напиши сообщение коммита для фикса гонки в обработке заказов
- Стоит ли делать rebase этой ветки перед PR?
Как установить git-workflow
1Через Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill git-workflow -a claude-code2Вручную: положить файлы
~/.claude/skills/git-workflow/SKILL.mdПапка скилла целиком; для одного проекта — .claude/skills/git-workflow/
1Через Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill git-workflow -a codex2Вручную: положить файлы
.agents/skills/git-workflow/SKILL.mdДля всех проектов — ~/.agents/skills/
1Через Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill git-workflow -a cursor2Вручную: положить файлы
.cursor/skills/git-workflow/SKILL.mdCursor читает и .agents/skills/, и .claude/skills/
1GitHub CLI
gh skill install affaan-m/ECC git-workflow2Вручную: положить файлы
.github/skills/git-workflow/SKILL.md1Через Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill git-workflow -a gemini-cli2Командой платформы
gemini skills install https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --path skills/git-workflowВручную: положить файлы
.devin/skills/git-workflow/SKILL.mdСтарый путь .windsurf/skills/ тоже читается
Через Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill git-workflow -a opencodeClaude.ai
Упакуйте папку в zip и загрузите в Settings → Capabilities → Skills
Из того же набора146
Весь набор →Похожие
Вопросы о git-workflow
Как установить git-workflow в Claude?
Выполните npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill git-workflow -a claude-code. Файл скилла окажется в ~/.claude/skills/git-workflow/SKILL.md.
Что делает скилл git-workflow?
Даёт агенту правила по ветвлению, оформлению коммитов и pull request, а также разбор merge против rebase и разрешения конфликтов.
Нужны ли дополнительные инструменты для работы скилла?
Нет. Это markdown-инструкции, они не запускают скрипты и не требуют установки пакетов.
Исходный текст
SKILL.md · MIT
---
name: git-workflow
description: Git workflow patterns including branching strategies, commit conventions, keeping history clean and readable, tidying local commits before merging, merge vs rebase, conflict resolution, and collaborative development best practices for teams of all sizes. Use when choosing a branching strategy, writing commit conventions, cleaning up history before a pull request, deciding merge versus rebase, or resolving conflicts.
metadata:
origin: ECC
---
# Git Workflow Patterns
Best practices for Git version control, branching strategies, and collaborative development.
## When to Activate
- Setting up Git workflow for a new project
- Deciding on branching strategy (GitFlow, trunk-based, GitHub flow)
- Writing commit messages and PR descriptions
- Resolving merge conflicts
- Managing releases and version tags
- Onboarding new team members to Git practices
## Branching Strategies
### GitHub Flow (Simple, Recommended for Most)
Best for continuous deployment and small-to-medium teams.
```
main (protected, always deployable)
│
├── feature/user-auth → PR → merge to main
├── feature/payment-flow → PR → merge to main
└── fix/login-bug → PR → merge to main
```
**Rules:**
- `main` is always deployable
- Create feature branches from `main`
- Open Pull Request when ready for review
- After approval and CI passes, merge to `main`
- Deploy immediately after merge
### Trunk-Based Development (High-Velocity Teams)
Best for teams with strong CI/CD and feature flags.
```
main (trunk)
│
├── short-lived feature (1-2 days max)
├── short-lived feature
└── short-lived feature
```
**Rules:**
- Everyone commits to `main` or very short-lived branches
- Feature flags hide incomplete work
- CI must pass before merge
- Deploy multiple times per day
### GitFlow (Complex, Release-Cycle Driven)
Best for scheduled releases and enterprise projects.
```
main (production releases)
│
└── develop (integration branch)
│
├── feature/user-auth
├── feature/payment
│
├── release/1.0.0 → merge to main and develop
│
└── hotfix/critical → merge to main and develop
```
**Rules:**
- `main` contains production-ready code only
- `develop` is the integration branch
- Feature branches from `develop`, merge back to `develop`
- Release branches from `develop`, merge to `main` and `develop`
- Hotfix branches from `main`, merge to both `main` and `develop`
### When to Use Which
| Strategy | Team Size | Release Cadence | Best For |
|----------|-----------|-----------------|----------|
| GitHub Flow | Any | Continuous | SaaS, web apps, startups |
| Trunk-Based | 5+ experienced | Multiple/day | High-velocity teams, feature flags |
| GitFlow | 10+ | Scheduled | Enterprise, regulated industries |
## Commit Messages
### Conventional Commits Format
```
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
[optional body]
[optional footer(s)]
```
### Types
| Type | Use For | Example |
|------|---------|---------|
| `feat` | New feature | `feat(auth): add OAuth2 login` |
| `fix` | Bug fix | `fix(api): handle null response in user endpoint` |
| `docs` | Documentation | `docs(readme): update installation instructions` |
| `style` | Formatting, no code change | `style: fix indentation in login component` |
| `refactor` | Code refactoring | `refactor(db): extract connection pool to module` |
| `test` | Adding/updating tests | `test(auth): add unit tests for token validation` |
| `chore` | Maintenance tasks | `chore(deps): update dependencies` |
| `perf` | Performance improvement | `perf(query): add index to users table` |
| `ci` | CI/CD changes | `ci: add PostgreSQL service to test workflow` |
| `revert` | Revert previous commit | `revert: revert "feat(auth): add OAuth2 login"` |
### Good vs Bad Examples
```
# BAD: Vague, no context
git commit -m "fixed stuff"
git commit -m "updates"
git commit -m "WIP"
# GOOD: Clear, specific, explains why
git commit -m "fix(api): retry requests on 503 Service Unavailable
The external API occasionally returns 503 errors during peak hours.
Added exponential backoff retry logic with max 3 attempts.
Closes #123"
```
### Commit Message Template
Create `.gitmessage` in repo root:
```
# <type>(<scope>): <subject>
# # Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, test, chore, perf, ci, revert
# Scope: api, ui, db, auth, etc.
# Subject: imperative mood, no period, max 50 chars
#
# [optional body] - explain why, not what
# [optional footer] - Breaking changes, closes #issue
```
Enable with: `git config commit.template .gitmessage`
## Merge vs Rebase
### Merge (Preserves History)
```bash
# Creates a merge commit
git checkout main
git merge feature/user-auth
# Result:
# * merge commit
# |\
# | * feature commits
# |/
# * main commits
```
**Use when:**
- Merging feature branches into `main`
- You want to preserve exact history
- Multiple people worked on the branch
- The branch has been pushed and others may have based work on it
### Rebase (Linear History)
```bash
# Rewrites feature commits onto target branch
git checkout feature/user-auth
git rebase main
# Result:
# * feature commits (rewritten)
# * main commits
```
**Use when:**
- Updating your local feature branch with latest `main`
- You want a linear, clean history
- The branch is local-only (not pushed)
- You're the only one working on the branch
### Rebase Workflow
```bash
# Update feature branch with latest main (before PR)
git checkout feature/user-auth
git fetch origin
git rebase origin/main
# Fix any conflicts
# Tests should still pass
# Force push (only if you're the only contributor)
git push --force-with-lease origin feature/user-auth
```
### When NOT to Rebase
```
# NEVER rebase branches that:
- Have been pushed to a shared repository
- Other people have based work on
- Are protected branches (main, develop)
- Are already merged
# Why: Rebase rewrites history, breaking others' work
```
## Pull Request Workflow
### PR Title Format
```
<type>(<scope>): <description>
Examples:
feat(auth): add SSO support for enterprise users
fix(api): resolve race condition in order processing
docs(api): add OpenAPI specification for v2 endpoints
```
### PR Description Template
```markdown
## What
Brief description of what this PR does.
## Why
Explain the motivation and context.
## How
Key implementation details worth highlighting.
## Testing
- [ ] Unit tests added/updated
- [ ] Integration tests added/updated
- [ ] Manual testing performed
## Screenshots (if applicable)
Before/after screenshots for UI changes.
## Checklist
- [ ] Code follows project style guidelines
- [ ] Self-review completed
- [ ] Comments added for complex logic
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] No new warnings introduced
- [ ] Tests pass locally
- [ ] Related issues linked
Closes #123
```
### Code Review Checklist
**For Reviewers:**
- [ ] Does the code solve the stated problem?
- [ ] Are there any edge cases not handled?
- [ ] Is the code readable and maintainable?
- [ ] Are there sufficient tests?
- [ ] Are there security concerns?
- [ ] Is the commit history clean (squashed if needed)?
**For Authors:**
- [ ] Self-review completed before requesting review
- [ ] CI passes (tests, lint, typecheck)
- [ ] PR size is reasonable (<500 lines ideal)
- [ ] Related to a single feature/fix
- [ ] Description clearly explains the change
## Conflict Resolution
### Identify Conflicts
```bash
# Check for conflicts before merge
git checkout main
git merge feature/user-auth --no-commit --no-ff
# If conflicts, Git will show:
# CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/auth/login.ts
# Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
```
### Resolve Conflicts
```bash
# See conflicted files
git status
# View conflict markers in file
# <<<<<<< HEAD
# content from main
# =======
# content from feature branch
# >>>>>>> feature/user-auth
# Option 1: Manual resolution
# Edit file, remove markers, keep correct content
# Option 2: Use merge tool
git mergetool
# Option 3: Accept one side
git checkout --ours src/auth/login.ts # Keep main version
git checkout --theirs src/auth/login.ts # Keep feature version
# After resolving, stage and commit
git add src/auth/login.ts
git commit
```
### Conflict Prevention Strategies
```bash
# 1. Keep feature branches small and short-lived
# 2. Rebase frequently onto main
git checkout feature/user-auth
git fetch origin
git rebase origin/main
# 3. Communicate with team about touching shared files
# 4. Use feature flags instead of long-lived branches
# 5. Review and merge PRs promptly
```
## Branch Management
### Naming Conventions
```
# Feature branches
feature/user-authentication
feature/JIRA-123-payment-integration
# Bug fixes
fix/login-redirect-loop
fix/456-null-pointer-exception
# Hotfixes (production issues)
hotfix/critical-security-patch
hotfix/database-connection-leak
# Releases
release/1.2.0
release/2024-01-hotfix
# Experiments/POCs
experiment/new-caching-strategy
poc/graphql-migration
```
### Branch Cleanup
```bash
# Delete local branches that are merged
git branch --merged main | grep -v "^\*\|main" | xargs -n 1 git branch -d
# Delete remote-tracking references for deleted remote branches
git fetch -p
# Delete local branch
git branch -d feature/user-auth # Safe delete (only if merged)
git branch -D feature/user-auth # Force delete
# Delete remote branch
git push origin --delete feature/user-auth
```
### Stash Workflow
```bash
# Save work in progress
git stash push -m "WIP: user authentication"
# List stashes
git stash list
# Apply most recent stash
git stash pop
# Apply specific stash
git stash apply stash@{2}
# Drop stash
git stash drop stash@{0}
```
## Release Management
### Semantic Versioning
```
MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH
MAJOR: Breaking changes
MINOR: New features, backward compatible
PATCH: Bug fixes, backward compatible
Examples:
1.0.0 → 1.0.1 (patch: bug fix)
1.0.1 → 1.1.0 (minor: new feature)
1.1.0 → 2.0.0 (major: breaking change)
```
### Creating Releases
```bash
# Create annotated tag
git tag -a v1.2.0 -m "Release v1.2.0
Features:
- Add user authentication
- Implement password reset
Fixes:
- Resolve login redirect issue
Breaking Changes:
- None"
# Push tag to remote
git push origin v1.2.0
# List tags
git tag -l
# Delete tag
git tag -d v1.2.0
git push origin --delete v1.2.0
```
### Changelog Generation
```bash
# Generate changelog from commits
git log v1.1.0..v1.2.0 --oneline --no-merges
# Or use conventional-changelog
npx conventional-changelog -i CHANGELOG.md -s
```
## Git Configuration
### Essential Configs
```bash
# User identity
git config --global user.name "Your Name"
git config --global user.email "[email protected]"
# Default branch name
git config --global init.defaultBranch main
# Pull behavior (rebase instead of merge)
git config --global pull.rebase true
# Push behavior (push current branch only)
git config --global push.default current
# Auto-correct typos
git config --global help.autocorrect 1
# Better diff algorithm
git config --global diff.algorithm histogram
# Color output
git config --global color.ui auto
```
### Useful Aliases
```bash
# Add to ~/.gitconfig
[alias]
co = checkout
br = branch
ci = commit
st = status
unstage = reset HEAD --
last = log -1 HEAD
visual = log --oneline --graph --all
amend = commit --amend --no-edit
wip = commit -m "WIP"
undo = reset --soft HEAD~1
contributors = shortlog -sn
```
### Gitignore Patterns
```gitignore
# Dependencies
node_modules/
vendor/
# Build outputs
dist/
build/
*.o
*.exe
# Environment files
.env
.env.local
.env.*.local
# IDE
.idea/
.vscode/
*.swp
*.swo
# OS files
.DS_Store
Thumbs.db
# Logs
*.log
logs/
# Test coverage
coverage/
# Cache
.cache/
*.tsbuildinfo
```
## Common Workflows
### Starting a New Feature
```bash
# 1. Update main branch
git checkout main
git pull origin main
# 2. Create feature branch
git checkout -b feature/user-auth
# 3. Make changes and commit
git add .
git commit -m "feat(auth): implement OAuth2 login"
# 4. Push to remote
git push -u origin feature/user-auth
# 5. Create Pull Request on GitHub/GitLab
```
### Updating a PR with New Changes
```bash
# 1. Make additional changes
git add .
git commit -m "feat(auth): add error handling"
# 2. Push updates
git push origin feature/user-auth
```
### Syncing Fork with Upstream
```bash
# 1. Add upstream remote (once)
git remote add upstream https://github.com/original/repo.git
# 2. Fetch upstream
git fetch upstream
# 3. Merge upstream/main into your main
git checkout main
git merge upstream/main
# 4. Push to your fork
git push origin main
```
### Undoing Mistakes
```bash
# Undo last commit (keep changes)
git reset --soft HEAD~1
# Undo last commit (discard changes)
git reset --hard HEAD~1
# Undo last commit pushed to remote
git revert HEAD
git push origin main
# Undo specific file changes
git checkout HEAD -- path/to/file
# Fix last commit message
git commit --amend -m "New message"
# Add forgotten file to last commit
git add forgotten-file
git commit --amend --no-edit
```
## Git Hooks
### Pre-Commit Hook
```bash
#!/bin/bash
# .git/hooks/pre-commit
# Run linting
npm run lint || exit 1
# Run tests
npm test || exit 1
# Check for secrets
if git diff --cached | grep -E '(password|api_key|secret)'; then
echo "Possible secret detected. Commit aborted."
exit 1
fi
```
### Pre-Push Hook
```bash
#!/bin/bash
# .git/hooks/pre-push
# Run full test suite
npm run test:all || exit 1
# Check for console.log statements
if git diff origin/main | grep -E 'console\.log'; then
echo "Remove console.log statements before pushing."
exit 1
fi
```
## Anti-Patterns
```
# BAD: Committing directly to main
git checkout main
git commit -m "fix bug"
# GOOD: Use feature branches and PRs
# BAD: Committing secrets
git add .env # Contains API keys
# GOOD: Add to .gitignore, use environment variables
# BAD: Giant PRs (1000+ lines)
# GOOD: Break into smaller, focused PRs
# BAD: "Update" commit messages
git commit -m "update"
git commit -m "fix"
# GOOD: Descriptive messages
git commit -m "fix(auth): resolve redirect loop after login"
# BAD: Rewriting public history
git push --force origin main
# GOOD: Use revert for public branches
git revert HEAD
# BAD: Long-lived feature branches (weeks/months)
# GOOD: Keep branches short (days), rebase frequently
# BAD: Committing generated files
git add dist/
git add node_modules/
# GOOD: Add to .gitignore
```
## Quick Reference
| Task | Command |
|------|---------|
| Create branch | `git checkout -b feature/name` |
| Switch branch | `git checkout branch-name` |
| Delete branch | `git branch -d branch-name` |
| Merge branch | `git merge branch-name` |
| Rebase branch | `git rebase main` |
| View history | `git log --oneline --graph` |
| View changes | `git diff` |
| Stage changes | `git add .` or `git add -p` |
| Commit | `git commit -m "message"` |
| Push | `git push origin branch-name` |
| Pull | `git pull origin branch-name` |
| Stash | `git stash push -m "message"` |
| Undo last commit | `git reset --soft HEAD~1` |
| Revert commit | `git revert HEAD` |
© affaan-m · MIT · affaan-m/ECC