fabric — скилл для Claude Code: именованные AI-трансформации текста
Скилл для запуска повторяемых именованных преобразований текста через Fabric CLI: саммари, извлечение идей, объяснение кода. Пригодится, когда один и тот же прогон нужен снова и снова.
npx skills add akillness/jeo-skills --skill fabric -a claude-codeЧто делает fabric
Скилл помогает агенту выбрать правильный режим работы с Fabric вместо того, чтобы каждый раз сочинять промпт заново. Сначала он классифицирует запрос по одной из дорожек: быстрая трансформация, подбор паттерна, свой паттерн, shell-конвейер, режим fabric --serve или разбор границ между Fabric и обычным LLM CLI. Затем проверяет входные данные: откуда берётся текст, достаточно ли он чистый, разовый это прогон или повторяемый.
Внутри — набор справочных документов: выбор режима, операторские пакеты, установка и настройка провайдера, рецепты работы с паттернами. Для быстрой трансформации скилл выдаёт один паттерн и одну точную команду, например cat transcript.txt | fabric -p summarize. Для повторяющейся задачи предлагает каркас своего паттерна из блоков IDENTITY AND PURPOSE, STEPS, OUTPUT INSTRUCTIONS и INPUT.
Если текст ещё сырой — грязный HTML, шумный OCR, плохая расшифровка — скилл скажет об этом прямо и не возьмётся чистить вход. Для режима сервера нужен запущенный fabric --serve и, возможно, --api-key; проверьте, локальная это машина или общая. Без настроенного провайдера или локальной модели команды не отработают, поэтому ключи готовят заранее.
Какие задачи решает
- прогнать расшифровку встречи через паттерн summarize
- вытащить ключевые идеи из статьи одной командой
- объяснить diff коммита через
fabric -p explain_code - собрать свой паттерн под повторяющуюся задачу
- отдать Fabric другому скрипту по HTTP через
fabric --serve
Примеры запросов агенту
- Прогони
transcript.txtчерез паттерн summarize и покажи краткое резюме - Помоги выбрать паттерн Fabric, чтобы вытащить тезисы из этой статьи
- Собери каркас своего паттерна для еженедельного разбора логов
Как установить fabric
1Через Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add akillness/jeo-skills --skill fabric -a claude-code2Вручную: положить файлы
~/.claude/skills/fabric/SKILL.mdПапка скилла целиком; для одного проекта — .claude/skills/fabric/
1Через Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add akillness/jeo-skills --skill fabric -a codex2Вручную: положить файлы
.agents/skills/fabric/SKILL.mdДля всех проектов — ~/.agents/skills/
1Через Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add akillness/jeo-skills --skill fabric -a cursor2Вручную: положить файлы
.cursor/skills/fabric/SKILL.mdCursor читает и .agents/skills/, и .claude/skills/
1GitHub CLI
gh skill install akillness/jeo-skills fabric2Вручную: положить файлы
.github/skills/fabric/SKILL.md1Через Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add akillness/jeo-skills --skill fabric -a gemini-cli2Командой платформы
gemini skills install https://github.com/akillness/jeo-skills --path .agent-skills/fabricВручную: положить файлы
.devin/skills/fabric/SKILL.mdСтарый путь .windsurf/skills/ тоже читается
Через Skills CLI (Vercel)
npx skills add akillness/jeo-skills --skill fabric -a opencodeClaude.ai
Упакуйте папку в zip и загрузите в Settings → Capabilities → Skills
По шагам, с командами для каждой платформы: Как установить скилл в Claude Code: пять способов
Вопросы о fabric
Как установить fabric в Claude Code?
Выполните npx skills add akillness/jeo-skills --skill fabric -a claude-code, затем проверьте файл ~/.claude/skills/fabric/SKILL.md.
Что делает скилл fabric?
Он проводит агента по дорожкам работы с Fabric: быстрая трансформация, подбор паттерна, свой паттерн, shell-конвейер и серверный режим. Заодно проверяет, готов ли входной текст и настроен ли провайдер.
Какие инструменты доступны скиллу?
В allowed-tools перечислены Read, Write, Bash, Grep и Glob. Через Bash и запускаются команды Fabric.
Исходный текст
SKILL.md · CC-BY-4.0
--- name: fabric description: > Routing-first Fabric operator skill for reusable named AI transforms over stdin, files, transcripts, notes, logs, and cleaned web text. Use when the user wants Fabric patterns, custom pattern packs, shell-pipe composition, or `fabric --serve` workflows — not generic one-off chat prompting, repo-aware coding, or fully deterministic automation. allowed-tools: Read Write Bash Grep Glob compatibility: > Works on macOS, Linux, and Windows where the Fabric CLI can be installed and configured. Best for CLI-centric users who already have provider keys or local model access and want repeatable prompt transforms rather than ad hoc chat. license: CC-BY-4.0 metadata: version: "2.1.0" author: supercent-io keyword: fabric platforms: All platforms tags: fabric, patterns, ai-prompts, prompt-orchestration, content-transforms, cli, piping, summarize, extract, custom-patterns, multi-provider source: Daniel Miessler Fabric README + REST API docs + GitHub issue survey (2026-04-18) --- # Fabric Use this skill when the real job is **running a reusable named AI transform over existing text/content with Fabric**. Fabric is strongest when three things are true: 1. the input already exists or can be cleaned first, 2. the transform is repeatable enough to deserve a named pattern, 3. the output should be delivered through a CLI, shell pipeline, or lightweight HTTP surface. Read these support docs before going deeper: - [references/routing-and-mode-selection.md](references/routing-and-mode-selection.md) - [references/operator-packets-and-route-outs.md](references/operator-packets-and-route-outs.md) - [references/install-and-provider-setup.md](references/install-and-provider-setup.md) - [references/pattern-workflow-recipes.md](references/pattern-workflow-recipes.md) ## When to use this skill - The user explicitly wants **Fabric**. - The user wants a **named pattern** instead of improvising a fresh prompt every time. - The job is a repeatable transform over **stdin, files, transcripts, clipboard text, notes, logs, or cleaned article text**. - The user wants a **custom pattern pack** for recurring work. - Fabric should sit inside a **shell pipeline** or a small local toolchain. - Another tool needs **Fabric server mode** via `fabric --serve`. - The boundary between **Fabric vs general LLM CLI vs coding assistant** is unclear. ## When not to use this skill - **One-off chat prompting in the current session** → use the current model directly. - **Repo-aware coding, editing, or git implementation** → use a coding-assistant skill. - **Scraping, OCR, transcript recovery, or file conversion is still the hard part** → fix the upstream input layer first. - **Deterministic multi-step automation is the real job** → use scripts or workflow automation, with Fabric only as one step if needed. - **Provider/platform setup is the whole question and not Fabric-specific** → use the more relevant platform/provider skill first. ## Core boundary - **Fabric** = reusable pattern-driven transforms on external text/content. - **General LLM CLI** = ad hoc prompting without strong pattern-library expectations. - **Coding assistant** = repo-aware editing, implementation, and git workflows. - **Workflow automation / scripts** = deterministic orchestration where Fabric may be one stage. ## Instructions ### Step 1: Classify the request into one primary lane Choose exactly one lane: ```yaml fabric_intake: primary_lane: quick-transform | pattern-selection | custom-pattern | shell-pipeline | serve-api | boundary-review input_shape: stdin-text | file | clipboard | transcript | url-derived-text | logs | code-snippet | mixed | unknown output_shape: summary | extraction | rewrite | explanation | classification | structured-markdown | custom repetition_level: one-off | recurring | team-shared | embedded-in-script provider_need: default | specific-provider | local-model | server-mode | unknown input_ready: yes | no | unclear ``` Lane chooser: - `quick-transform` → the text is already available and one strong Fabric pass is enough. - `pattern-selection` → the user needs the right built-in pattern or family. - `custom-pattern` → the workflow repeats and needs a stable output shape. - `shell-pipeline` → Fabric is one step inside a larger terminal workflow. - `serve-api` → another local tool or script should call Fabric over HTTP. - `boundary-review` → the user is deciding among Fabric, a general LLM CLI, or a coding assistant. ### Step 2: Verify the input layer before talking about patterns Answer these first: 1. Where does the text come from? 2. Is the text already clean enough for Fabric? 3. Is this a one-shot transform or a reusable workflow? 4. Is provider/model setup already available? If the text is still messy HTML, OCR noise, bad transcripts, or missing entirely, say so explicitly. Do not pretend Fabric owns the upstream cleanup problem. ### Step 3: Run the correct lane #### A. Quick-transform Return: - one recommended pattern, - one exact command, - expected output shape, - one optional follow-up chain only if it materially helps. Examples: ```bash cat transcript.txt | fabric -p summarize pbpaste | fabric -p extract_wisdom git diff HEAD~1 | fabric -p explain_code ``` #### B. Pattern-selection Return the top **1-3** plausible patterns and why. Use job shape, not novelty: - **summarize** → compress source into a readable brief - **extract / wisdom / questions / claims** → pull structured ideas out - **explain / analyze** → interpret code, prose, logs, incidents, or decisions - **rewrite / improve / repurpose** → convert one artifact into another tone or shape Do not dump the whole catalog. #### C. Custom-pattern Use when the workflow will recur. Minimum scaffold: ```text IDENTITY AND PURPOSE STEPS OUTPUT INSTRUCTIONS INPUT ``` Good custom-pattern output includes: - pattern name, - exact use case, - `system.md` skeleton, - example invocation, - note on when to fork vs reuse a stock pattern. #### D. Shell-pipeline Treat Fabric as one stage in a pipeline: ```text fetch or prepare input → optional cleanup → fabric pattern → save / chain / post-edit ``` Return: - what creates the input, - where Fabric sits, - where output goes, - what still needs human review or another tool. #### E. Serve-api Use when another app/script needs HTTP access. Baseline commands: ```bash fabric --serve curl http://localhost:8080/patterns/names ``` Also call out: - whether `--api-key` is needed, - local-only vs shared-machine assumptions, - whether the caller needs pattern CRUD, listing, apply endpoints, or plain chat completion. #### F. Boundary-review Compare by workflow shape: - **Fabric** → repeatable named transforms over external text/content - **general LLM CLI** → flexible ad hoc prompting - **coding assistant** → repo-aware code work - **workflow automation** → deterministic multi-step logic If the user is mixing use cases, keep Fabric only for the transform layer. ### Step 4: Return a short operator packet Default output should contain: - chosen lane, - input source and cleanup assumptions, - recommended pattern(s) or custom-pattern path, - exact command(s) or artifact layout, - realistic friction note, - route-out if Fabric is not the whole answer. Use this structure: ```text # Fabric Workflow Packet ## Lane - quick-transform | pattern-selection | custom-pattern | shell-pipeline | serve-api | boundary-review ## Input - source: ... - cleanup needed: ... - assumptions: ... ## Recommended Fabric move - pattern / custom pattern / server mode: ... - why this fits: ... ## Command or artifact - exact command(s) or `system.md` scaffold ## Output shape - summary / extraction / rewrite / explanation / structured markdown / custom ## Friction - provider setup / token limits / noisy input / post-editing / custom-pattern drift ## Route-outs - next tool or workflow layer if Fabric is not the whole answer ``` ### Step 5: Keep the advice reusable Prefer: - one primary lane, - one top recommendation over a laundry list, - a reusable custom-pattern scaffold over a clever one-off prompt, - honest route-outs when Fabric is not the whole answer. ## Examples ### Example 1: Transcript summary **Input** > I already have transcript.txt. Show me how to use Fabric to summarize it and keep the workflow reusable. **Output sketch** - Lane: `quick-transform` - Command: `cat transcript.txt | fabric -p summarize` - Output: markdown summary - Route-out: only add another extraction pass if action items matter ### Example 2: Weekly custom pattern **Input** > We summarize competitor articles every week. Help me make a reusable Fabric pattern pack. **Output sketch** - Lane: `custom-pattern` - Deliver `system.md` scaffold plus invocation - Explain why a custom pattern beats repeating a one-off prompt ### Example 3: Fabric or something else? **Input** > Should I use Fabric, a general LLM CLI, or a coding assistant for this workflow? **Output sketch** - Lane: `boundary-review` - Keep repeatable text transforms in Fabric - Route repo-aware editing to a coding assistant ## Best practices 1. Treat Fabric as a **pattern-first transform layer**, not a generic terminal chatbot. 2. Solve messy input acquisition before blaming the pattern. 3. Return the top 1-3 pattern choices instead of the full catalog. 4. Fork a custom pattern when the workflow repeats or the output shape must stay stable. 5. Only recommend `fabric --serve` when another tool genuinely needs HTTP access. 6. Keep provider/setup friction explicit instead of hiding it behind pattern talk. 7. If the task is really coding-assistant work or deterministic automation, route out early. ## References - [Fabric upstream README](https://github.com/danielmiessler/Fabric/blob/main/README.md) - [Fabric REST API docs](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/danielmiessler/Fabric/main/docs/rest-api.md) - [references/routing-and-mode-selection.md](references/routing-and-mode-selection.md) - [references/operator-packets-and-route-outs.md](references/operator-packets-and-route-outs.md) - [references/install-and-provider-setup.md](references/install-and-provider-setup.md) - [references/pattern-workflow-recipes.md](references/pattern-workflow-recipes.md)
© supercent-io · CC-BY-4.0 · akillness/jeo-skills